patriotic american!

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So if homosexuality is only condemned in the old testament, and my friend dan here says the old testament doesn't matter.. why do modern Christians condemn homosexuality as a sin?
Colonel, I just have one more question before I put Airman O'Malley and Airman Rodriguez on the stand. If you gave an order that Santiago wasn't to be touched, and your orders are always followed, then why would Santiago be in danger?
 

Nutes and Nugs

Well-Known Member
"it's not normal" applies to a whole host of other things Christians don't condemn.

If they condemn homosexuality for being "not normal", why don't they condemn any of the other things they would also consider "not normal" applying the exact same standard?
Christian or whatever
it ain't normal.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Because it's not normal.
you don't even know what normal means.

green eyes and left handedness are normal variations of eye color or handedness and they are not found in 50% of the population.

just give up. come out of the closet and embrace who you are.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
The only allusions to homosexuality being a sin exist in the old testament. If this is true, why to modern Christians condemn homosexuality as a sin?


Because it's not normal.
You are purposefully avoiding my question. You know exactly what I'm asking you and you've avoided answering it honestly for the 3rd time now.

Lets go through this one more time..

I asked why Christians view homosexuality as a sin

You said "because it's not normal"

I gave you many different examples of things, using the exact same standards you are using to condemn homosexuality as "not normal" that wouldn't be considered "normal" that Christians don't protest about and asked you why this but not that?

You said "because it's not normal"

...I said for the third time that even if it's "not normal", a lot of things - using the exact same standards - would not be considered "normal" by Christians and again, your only reply was "because it's not normal", failing to address the many other things I cited that would also not be considered "normal" by Christian standards...

So, according to you, either dan is wrong; that the old testament does matter, because if it didn't no modern Christians would condemn homosexuality as a sin, or he's right, that the old testament doesn't matter, in which case, why do modern Christians condemn homosexuality as a sin (as it's only referenced in the old testament; Gen 22:5-22:8 )?

Avoiding the question for a 4th time is admission that you refuse to answer the question because you don't want to admit a fellow conservative/religious nut is wrong or that you were wrong. One of you is wrong, saying "because it's not normal" again is simply admitting you're both wrong.
 

Nutes and Nugs

Well-Known Member
You are purposefully avoiding my question. You know exactly what I'm asking you and you've avoided answering it honestly for the 3rd time now.

Lets go through this one more time..

I asked why Christians view homosexuality as a sin

You said "because it's not normal"

I gave you many different examples of things, using the exact same standards you are using to condemn homosexuality as "not normal" that wouldn't be considered "normal" that Christians don't protest about and asked you why this but not that?

You said "because it's not normal"

...I said for the third time that even if it's "not normal", a lot of things - using the exact same standards - would not be considered "normal" by Christians and again, your only reply was "because it's not normal", failing to address the many other things I cited that would also not be considered "normal" by Christian standards...

So, according to you, either dan is wrong; that the old testament does matter, because if it didn't no modern Christians would condemn homosexuality as a sin, or he's right, that the old testament doesn't matter, in which case, why do modern Christians condemn homosexuality as a sin (as it's only referenced in the old testament; Gen 22:5-22:8 )?

Avoiding the question for a 4th time is admission that you refuse to answer the question because you don't want to admit a fellow conservative/religious nut is wrong or that you were wrong. One of you is wrong, saying "because it's not normal" again is simply admitting you're both wrong.
You know what I'm gonna say but...

Less than 3 percent of the U.S. population identify themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Tuesday in the first large-scale government survey measuring Americans’ sexual orientation.

How is 3% normal?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/health-survey-gives-government-its-first-large-scale-data-on-gay-bisexual-population/2014/07/14/2db9f4b0-092f-11e4-bbf1-cc51275e7f8f_story.html
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Because you always dilute the subject.
It's not about green eyes or penises.
but green eyes are not "normal".

yet usually by 1:30 AM PDT, you are not spouting off about eye colors. hell, you never even spout off about lesbians licking each other's vaginas passionately.

it's always about one thing with you: male on male anal penetration.

why is it that when we talk about homosexuality you always refer exclusively to penises (see above), anal penetration, man anus and the like?
 
Top