UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
can you name one instance where you mentioned female sexual relations when talking about your objections to homosexuality?You are right.
All I talk about is gay sex.
can you name one instance where you mentioned female sexual relations when talking about your objections to homosexuality?You are right.
All I talk about is gay sex.
You're missing the point; it doesn't matter what is "normal" or "abnormal", these are not the standards in which we base our society. If they were, like I've shown you by example, we would be banning levi's, cars, glasses, movies, art, music.. almost everything we have that is not considered "normal" by the exact same standards homosexuality isn't considered "normal". Left handed people.. minorities by definition, etc..Less than 3 percent of the U.S. population identify themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual
How is 3% normal?
saving one.......LOL. drink Windex, and smother yourself in Sky's immense, yeasty snatch.you sure about that? you got a quote from me to back that up?
because i'm saving one for you princess.
The Christian still holds the record for homegrown terrorist fatalitiesHad to get into your time machine to pull that one up, eh?
Sometimes a gun can be used to deter people that threaten harm. It isn't always used for lethal purposes.The only purpose of a gun is to kill. That's what they're designed for. The very first commandment is thou shalt not kill. You don't see a conflict there?
I use my .45 to open beers - change the channel on the tv - turn out the lights. You name it. Guns are Gods* way of saying he loves us.
*does not exist
Looks like you've been pushed down and kicked again. Time to pull out the old COP badge. Good job OFFICER. There will be a little something extra in your envelope this week.yeah, i'm sure your RIU profile is completely independent of the half a dozen other smokey dan profiles across the web.
That's exactly what I expected dan (and don, desertdude, kelly4, nodrama, kynes, nutesnnugs, bignbushy... sheskunk) to look like..
Ok so it's like this, when I said the OT wasn't important to today's christians, that doesn't mean there isn't anything that doesn't apply.The only allusions to homosexuality being a sin exist in the old testament. If this is true, why to modern Christians condemn homosexuality as a sin?
The laws do not apply.wrong. the Old Testament is the entire legal basis of your dead rabbi cult. Jesus clearly stated he came to maintain those laws. learn about your cult, before playing theologist.
The universe DEMANDS proof!!My boobs are much bigger.
You're misapplying my point.You are purposefully avoiding my question. You know exactly what I'm asking you and you've avoided answering it honestly for the 3rd time now.
Lets go through this one more time..
I asked why Christians view homosexuality as a sin
You said "because it's not normal"
I gave you many different examples of things, using the exact same standards you are using to condemn homosexuality as "not normal" that wouldn't be considered "normal" that Christians don't protest about and asked you why this but not that?
You said "because it's not normal"
...I said for the third time that even if it's "not normal", a lot of things - using the exact same standards - would not be considered "normal" by Christians and again, your only reply was "because it's not normal", failing to address the many other things I cited that would also not be considered "normal" by Christian standards...
So, according to you, either dan is wrong; that the old testament does matter, because if it didn't no modern Christians would condemn homosexuality as a sin, or he's right, that the old testament doesn't matter, in which case, why do modern Christians condemn homosexuality as a sin (as it's only referenced in the old testament; Gen 22:5-22:8 )?
Avoiding the question for a 4th time is admission that you refuse to answer the question because you don't want to admit a fellow conservative/religious nut is wrong or that you were wrong. One of you is wrong, saying "because it's not normal" again is simply admitting you're both wrong.
LOL........."do no think I have come to change the laws, or the prophets."The laws do not apply.
Jesus entire purpose was to destroy the laws. To remove them from the requirements of salvation.
There are important insights that can be made from the OT. But because of the sacrifice of Jesus, the laws don't apply.
The reason the OT is included is all of its prophecy points to jesus.
What is a sin in the OT is still mostly a sin, with a few explicitly made exceptions. How they are resolved are different.
the Old Testament does not apply. well then.....that's not Christianity then.The laws do not apply.
Jesus entire purpose was to destroy the laws. To remove them from the requirements of salvation.
There are important insights that can be made from the OT. But because of the sacrifice of Jesus, the laws don't apply.
The reason the OT is included is all of its prophecy points to jesus.
What is a sin in the OT is still mostly a sin, with a few explicitly made exceptions. How they are resolved are different.
Maybe because that is the only thing you understand.but green eyes are not "normal".
yet usually by 1:30 AM PDT, you are not spouting off about eye colors. hell, you never even spout off about lesbians licking each other's vaginas passionately.
it's always about one thing with you: male on male anal penetration.
why is it that when we talk about homosexuality you always refer exclusively to penises (see above), anal penetration, man anus and the like?
Read levitacus... then see how many of those laws apply.the Old Testament does not apply. well then.....that's not Christianity then.
see: the Gospels, your local Christian clergy
"read levitacus...."Read levitacus... then see how many of those laws apply.
The new covenant and all that.
Yes, very important point you made. Paul is more important to the formation of Christianity than jesus. Paul praises jesus, but puts an entirely new spin on things."read levitacus...."
HokeyDan........I have read Leviticus in English, Hebrew, and took a crack at it in Aramaic, in school.
"Jesus" clearly states that he did not come to change ANYTHING that is proscribed in the Torah. he does not promise Peace, but, "fire and sword."
now......Saul of Taursus.........the founder of your cult. he twisted everything, as a part of his recruitment drive. Jesus born on Saturnalia, the end of circumcision, dietary restraints, etc.
Essenic Judaism (itself a by-product of earlier Eastern mysticisms), mixed with Roman paganism, then marinated in Celtic/Germanic paganism...........is what you refer to as Christianity.