I don't come at this with a whole lot of experience...yet. So you can add all the salt you want. First, considering the "never physically move"....on my grow I have 8 plants stored in 2 rows running under 24/0,(the lighting suggested to me by someone who has been growing perpetually for well over a decade) 600W MH. During veg I rotated them twice a day. So, every 4 days each plant had spent 12 hours in all eight positions or in other words had light penetrating from eight different directions. I have continued this to a degree in flower...but only once a day and on some days I have just spun them. I credit this with giving me a pretty even canopy and pretty well rounded plants. I also have been watering them on stool or table, in a clean area right outside my grow room. Again physically moving them out of the room, and then back again. This too will probably stop at some point as their volume is already making this a bit cumbersome. But it allows me to give each plant some individual attention.
Secondly, I know there are arguments on all sides of the 24/0, 20/4, 18/6 lighting question. I actually am going to give 20/4 a try next run, just for a bud comparison (someone I respect here likes that for the ultimate quality of the buds) ...but when I first started this endeavor a couple months ago, I knew nothing about ANY lighting schedule. My mentor told me to use 24/0 without ever offering the possibility of the others. It was not until discovering RIU that I discovered the different practices. Now I like the thought of giving them some light rest, but 24/0 has worked well... and when I asked my mentor about this since he just kind of stared at me and said "I know some people do it different, but why would you want to limit the grow time?" My plants, at the end of veg, ended out pretty nice with plenty of healthy roots so I cannot argue with him.