I am woman

[desert dude]

Here is the fascist prescription that al Londoni and al Portlandi want imposed. I am pretty sure they will be here to divert to the awful Christians who want to control women's ovum by refusing to pay for their IUDs.

Jihadists in the northern Syrian province of Raqa have accused a woman of adultery and stoned her to death, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said on Friday.
http://news.yahoo.com/jihadists-stone-syria-woman-death-adultery-ngo-142139634.html

 

[DonAlejandroVega]

ac

WOW could have sworn you said you don't get down like that... but I knew you did

actually.....today is a first. it won't continue. I was really shocked by his post about Rob's daughter. I'll rather ignite him, with a plasma welder, but giving him a taste of his medicine will have to do. you don't know half the things you think you do.

 

[DonAlejandroVega]

Lol I'm so anti feminist. ...I luv being a women...who needs a big strong man...that I boss around. ..because he let's me...♡

take your clothes off and make me a sammich

 

[april]

take your clothes off and make me a sammich

Would u like a beer? Bong? oh the garbage is full...Please take it out...my nails are wet.

 

[DonAlejandroVega]

Would u like a beer? Bong? oh the garbage is full...Please take it out...my nails are wet.

your wish is my demand, my princess

 

[thump easy]

Please is it Ipa?

 

[theexpress]

Would u like a beer? Bong? oh the garbage is full...Please take it out...my nails are wet.

lollllllll.......

 

[desert dude]

Would u like a beer? Bong? oh the garbage is full...Please take it out...my nails are wet.

Quite an accurate metaphor for the cordial relationship between men and women.

 

[desert dude]

Your fellow travelers in action, al Londoni and al Portlandi.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/10977698/Christians-flee-Iraqs-Mosul-after-Islamists-tell-them-convert-pay-or-die.html


Christian families streamed out of the northern Iraqi city of Mosul on Saturday after Islamist fighters said they would be killed if they did not pay a protection tax or convert to Islam.

“For the first time in the history of Iraq, Mosul is now empty of Christians,” Patriarch Louis Sako lamented as hundreds of families fled ahead of a noon deadline set by Islamic State for them to submit or leave.

The warning was read out in Mosul’s mosques on Friday afternoon, and broadcast throughout the city on loudspeakers.

“We offer [Christians] three choices: Islam; the dhimma contract - involving payment... if they refuse this they will have nothing but the sword,” the announcement read.

 

[DonAlejandroVega]

Your fellow travelers in action, al Londoni and al Portlandi.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/10977698/Christians-flee-Iraqs-Mosul-after-Islamists-tell-them-convert-pay-or-die.html


Christian families streamed out of the northern Iraqi city of Mosul on Saturday after Islamist fighters said they would be killed if they did not pay a protection tax or convert to Islam.

“For the first time in the history of Iraq, Mosul is now empty of Christians,” Patriarch Louis Sako lamented as hundreds of families fled ahead of a noon deadline set by Islamic State for them to submit or leave.

The warning was read out in Mosul’s mosques on Friday afternoon, and broadcast throughout the city on loudspeakers.

“We offer [Christians] three choices: Islam; the dhimma contract - involving payment... if they refuse this they will have nothing but the sword,” the announcement read.

the dim, on here, don't realize they are dhimmi

 

[charface]

 

[DonAlejandroVega]

Jefferson said, "here's yer fuckin Jizya"

 

[UncleBuck]

Forced integration and forced segregation spring from the same cess pool.

When did I ever advocate for either one as a forced policy?

so how do you envision your society of denying service to blacks working, voluntarily?

nope, it requires FORCE by HOSTILE RACISTS to work like you envision it.

blacks are not just gonna voluntarily agree to a lesser and inferior set of goods and services, because that is a harmful and racist policy (which you argue endlessly for).

you are white trash. get fucked.

 

[UncleBuck]

al Londoni and al Portlandi

i like how you keep using muslim sounding names as an insult.

totally something a white supremacist like you would do.

keep being predictable.

 

[UncleBuck]

ac

actually.....today is a first. it won't continue. I was really shocked by his post about Rob's daughter. I'll rather ignite him, with a plasma welder, but giving him a taste of his medicine will have to do. you don't know half the things you think you do.

blame rob roy.

he's the one who said he wouldn't mind if his stripper daughter sucked strangers' cocks for extra money.

after all, she has to own herself. way more dignified than teaching kids to read in a public school.

 

[Rob Roy]

so how do you envision your society of denying service to blacks working, voluntarily?

nope, it requires FORCE by HOSTILE RACISTS to work like you envision it.

blacks are not just gonna voluntarily agree to a lesser and inferior set of goods and services, because that is a harmful and racist policy (which you argue endlessly for).

you are white trash. get fucked.

You sure do get whiny when your diaper is wet. You also should start viewing people as individuals, rather than collectively... racist.

Okay I'll answer your questions, since you do such a good job responding to others questions, well you don't but I'll forgive you. I'll forgive you, because I know you are incapable of answering some questions, most likely because you're a little slow on the logic and comprehension and because you have a pack of gerbils up your ass.

A society is a collection of individuals all with individual likes, dislikes etc. Those individuals that get along and want to associate should be free to associate on a consensual basis regardless of any silly rules others might try to impose on them.
No peaceful society can imbed forced associations as a matter of course or legally endorse those coercive actions and remain "peaceful", it is illogical. Like putting gas on a fire and hoping it will extinguish it.

All people should be free not to associate with those they prefer not to. Nobody, black, white, or other, should be forced to associate with anyone, since that would imbed legal (but immoral) coercion from the start or impose an unequal hierarchy, which is a bad idea. I assume since you've never addressed or refuted the points I just made, you believe they are valid.

Since you brought up force, I'll state their are two kinds of force. One is a defensive act, which is morally justifiable to use to REPEL an act of aggression or forced association.

In other words a black person that has a KKK guy burning a cross on his front lawn has a moral right to repel the KKK douchebag. I wouldn't bat an eye in that instance if the KKK guy got his ass handed to him. He has it coming, in THAT instance.

However, If the KKK douchbag stayed on his own property and wanted to wear a sheet, that's his right. While I don't think he's making a good choice, it's not my right to force him to do anything, UNLESS and UNTIL he leaves his own property and causes another person an actionable harm.

Conversely the black person, or anybody else of any color or race, has no right to force anybody to associate with him or serve him. All people only have the right to repel a forced association (act of initiated aggression) against them or their justly acquired property. NO people have the right to force an association. Those rights are the same for all people, race is irrelevant.

The other kind of force is an offensive act which is the kind you endorse, the kind that substitutes force for consent and allows one party to make another associate with them regardless if the association is agreed to both parties. This is the kind that prohibitionists use, coercive governments use and people that like to run others lives for them use. You endorse this kind. I do not.

You refer to "blacks" as a class of people, which is revealing about how you view the world. I tend to view people as individuals you appear not to. However, "blacks" have the same rights as anybody else, no more, no less. Blacks should not be forced to associate with anybody they prefer not to. Therefore neither blacks, whites or anybody else has any right to force others to associate with them, and all people have the right to resist a forced association, just as they have the right to resist a home invasion, a rape or an internet douchebag that wants to stuff gerbils up their ass or shit on their bathroom floor and run away.

As far as "blacks" voluntarily accepting inferior goods, what is your point? That all blacks will behave in lockstep? That's racist of you to think that way.
Some will steal. Some will be creative. Some will be productive. I doubt all will behave the same way. Those that want to trade on a consensual basis with others will find lots of willing trade partners, unless the coercive government re-institutes a policy of forced segregation.

Nobody should be kept from integrating, IF all the parties in that instance agree. Nobody should be forced to integrate, if one or both of the parties prefers not to associate.

Nobody should be made to be segregated, IF the all individual parties in that instance wish to associate.

No, I am not white trash. That sounds like a racist term.

Now go home and rub some salve on your kicked ass and please let the gerbils go, it would be the right thing to do.

 

[Rob Roy]

blame rob roy.

he's the one who said he wouldn't mind if his stripper daughter sucked strangers' cocks for extra money.

after all, she has to own herself. way more dignified than teaching kids to read in a public school.

A person that sucks cock for money on a consensual basis is involved in an honest exchange.

A person that receives payment via a public school, which is funded thru coercion is involved in a forced exchange.




Does your morality believe that forced exchanges are better than consenting exchanges?

 

[Rob Roy]

If you watch his pattern you will understand that he must put other people down and mock other people to make himself feel better about his lowlife position on the planet. It is very destructive both externally and internally. I think it is his unemployment and the disappointment of all the people around him that feed his internet rage.

It could also be penis envy.

 

[DonAlejandroVega]

You sure do get whiny when your diaper is wet. You also should start viewing people as individuals, rather than collectively... racist.

Okay I'll answer your questions, since you do such a good job responding to others questions, well you don't but I'll forgive you. I'll forgive you, because I know you are incapable of answering some questions, most likely because you're a little slow on the logic and comprehension and because you have a pack of gerbils up your ass.

A society is a collection of individuals all with individual likes, dislikes etc. Those individuals that get along and want to associate should be free to associate on a consensual basis regardless of any silly rules others might try to impose on them.
No peaceful society can imbed forced associations as a matter of course or legally endorse those coercive actions and remain "peaceful", it is illogical. Like putting gas on a fire and hoping it will extinguish it.

All people should be free not to associate with those they prefer not to. Nobody, black, white, or other, should be forced to associate with anyone, since that would imbed legal (but immoral) coercion from the start or impose an unequal hierarchy, which is a bad idea. I assume since you've never addressed or refuted the points I just made, you believe they are valid.

Since you brought up force, I'll state their are two kinds of force. One is a defensive act, which is morally justifiable to use to REPEL an act of aggression or forced association.

In other words a black person that has a KKK guy burning a cross on his front lawn has a moral right to repel the KKK douchebag. I wouldn't bat an eye in that instance if the KKK guy got his ass handed to him. He has it coming, in THAT instance.

However, If the KKK douchbag stayed on his own property and wanted to wear a sheet, that's his right. While I don't think he's making a good choice, it's not my right to force him to do anything, UNLESS and UNTIL he leaves his own property and causes another person an actionable harm.

Conversely the black person, or anybody else of any color or race, has no right to force anybody to associate with him or serve him. All people only have the right to repel a forced association (act of initiated aggression) against them or their justly acquired property. NO people have the right to force an association. Those rights are the same for all people, race is irrelevant.

The other kind of force is an offensive act which is the kind you endorse, the kind that substitutes force for consent and allows one party to make another associate with them regardless if the association is agreed to both parties. This is the kind that prohibitionists use, coercive governments use and people that like to run others lives for them use. You endorse this kind. I do not.

You refer to "blacks" as a class of people, which is revealing about how you view the world. I tend to view people as individuals you appear not to. However, "blacks" have the same rights as anybody else, no more, no less. Blacks should not be forced to associate with anybody they prefer not to. Therefore neither blacks, whites or anybody else has any right to force others to associate with them, and all people have the right to resist a forced association, just as they have the right to resist a home invasion, a rape or an internet douchebag that wants to stuff gerbils up their ass or shit on their bathroom floor and run away.

As far as "blacks" voluntarily accepting inferior goods, what is your point? That all blacks will behave in lockstep? That's racist of you to think that way.
Some will steal. Some will be creative. Some will be productive. I doubt all will behave the same way. Those that want to trade on a consensual basis with others will find lots of willing trade partners, unless the coercive government re-institutes a policy of forced segregation.

Nobody should be kept from integrating, IF all the parties in that instance agree. Nobody should be forced to integrate, if one or both of the parties prefers not to associate.

Nobody should be made to be segregated, IF the all individual parties in that instance wish to associate.

No, I am not white trash. That sounds like a racist term.

Now go home and rub some salve on your kicked ass and please let the gerbils go, it would be the right thing to do.

 

[desert dude]

You sure do get whiny when your diaper is wet. You also should start viewing people as individuals, rather than collectively... racist.

Okay I'll answer your questions, since you do such a good job responding to others questions, well you don't but I'll forgive you. I'll forgive you, because I know you are incapable of answering some questions, most likely because you're a little slow on the logic and comprehension and because you have a pack of gerbils up your ass.

A society is a collection of individuals all with individual likes, dislikes etc. Those individuals that get along and want to associate should be free to associate on a consensual basis regardless of any silly rules others might try to impose on them.
No peaceful society can imbed forced associations as a matter of course or legally endorse those coercive actions and remain "peaceful", it is illogical. Like putting gas on a fire and hoping it will extinguish it.

All people should be free not to associate with those they prefer not to. Nobody, black, white, or other, should be forced to associate with anyone, since that would imbed legal (but immoral) coercion from the start or impose an unequal hierarchy, which is a bad idea. I assume since you've never addressed or refuted the points I just made, you believe they are valid.

Since you brought up force, I'll state their are two kinds of force. One is a defensive act, which is morally justifiable to use to REPEL an act of aggression or forced association.

In other words a black person that has a KKK guy burning a cross on his front lawn has a moral right to repel the KKK douchebag. I wouldn't bat an eye in that instance if the KKK guy got his ass handed to him. He has it coming, in THAT instance.

However, If the KKK douchbag stayed on his own property and wanted to wear a sheet, that's his right. While I don't think he's making a good choice, it's not my right to force him to do anything, UNLESS and UNTIL he leaves his own property and causes another person an actionable harm.

Conversely the black person, or anybody else of any color or race, has no right to force anybody to associate with him or serve him. All people only have the right to repel a forced association (act of initiated aggression) against them or their justly acquired property. NO people have the right to force an association. Those rights are the same for all people, race is irrelevant.

The other kind of force is an offensive act which is the kind you endorse, the kind that substitutes force for consent and allows one party to make another associate with them regardless if the association is agreed to both parties. This is the kind that prohibitionists use, coercive governments use and people that like to run others lives for them use. You endorse this kind. I do not.

You refer to "blacks" as a class of people, which is revealing about how you view the world. I tend to view people as individuals you appear not to. However, "blacks" have the same rights as anybody else, no more, no less. Blacks should not be forced to associate with anybody they prefer not to. Therefore neither blacks, whites or anybody else has any right to force others to associate with them, and all people have the right to resist a forced association, just as they have the right to resist a home invasion, a rape or an internet douchebag that wants to stuff gerbils up their ass or shit on their bathroom floor and run away.

As far as "blacks" voluntarily accepting inferior goods, what is your point? That all blacks will behave in lockstep? That's racist of you to think that way.
Some will steal. Some will be creative. Some will be productive. I doubt all will behave the same way. Those that want to trade on a consensual basis with others will find lots of willing trade partners, unless the coercive government re-institutes a policy of forced segregation.

Nobody should be kept from integrating, IF all the parties in that instance agree. Nobody should be forced to integrate, if one or both of the parties prefers not to associate.

Nobody should be made to be segregated, IF the all individual parties in that instance wish to associate.

No, I am not white trash. That sounds like a racist term.

Now go home and rub some salve on your kicked ass and please let the gerbils go, it would be the right thing to do.

Are you suggesting that people who are not allowed to freely choose their associates are not free? How radical!