Again, you can argue semantics and pretend a "good christian" is equivalent with someone "believing" in christ (what's with the caps lol - just playing Devil's advocate...), in reality that is not always the case. I agree it won't make you a "good christian" in the eyes of believers but let's face it, there are as many variations of the interpretation "good christian" as there are people that refer to themselves as a good christian. You and I certainly don't determine for someone else what it means - if only it were that easy.
So, by taking the good advice that is still valid today and not taking the stories literally. By taking it the way the stories were meant before they were plagiarized, rewritten and bundled. Some people need to be bullshitted to act civil... like 90% of the planet. If some can derive from that the intention and see through the bullshit and end up calling themselves atheist christians I consider that a good thing, or at least a step in the right direction. I do agree a better label should be made up but if 'christian' will lose its strict original meaning because of it I consider that a good thing too (plus no more reason to cap it). Maybe more people will start to realize they can be a christian without believing the nonsense and while still being able to be an atheist they will be less eager to insist on spreading and making others believe the nonsense too.
You've basically hit the nail on the head.
I listen to Dawkins and he says it's mostly terrible evil with a few nominally decent things sprinkled in.
I think the problem arises when people read the bible like a novel. Front to back with equal importance given to all parts.
Having a decent understanding of theology and how to interpret it according to Christian ideas. Some parts abrogate others. The abrogated parts are still important.
Most atheists don't understand how that works and see a contradiction where none really exists.
The wisdom of the Bible is timeless.
For dessert dwelling goat headers they possessed wisdom beyond their station.
There is a reason Jews circumcised male babies three days after birth. I can't recall it now, but it has to do with proper clotting, healing and infection prevention.
I like the principals, I don't believe the bullshit.