The Death of William Reddie

[TheMan13]

Does anyone have a connection or subscription with the Gaylord Herald Times or related news papers? All of my leads have went dry and I haven't been able to get a single response from the Gaylord Herald Times in reference to Detective Sgt. Rick Sekely's (Michigan State Police) 250 page report that they had obtained via a FOIA request back on May 18, 2012. I assume they have no intention of providing me a copy, but just the MSP report number would get me back on track at this point. It's odd they had received and reported an award (in 2014) for their February 2013 reporting and just left it at that, unanswered questions and all ...

 

[GregS]

Would you like to play a game? History tells us how to deal with out of control government and police power. I like stories with happy endings.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=xzCEdSKMkdU

 

[TheMan13]

Would you like to play a game? History tells us how to deal with out of control government and police power. I like stories with happy endings.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=xzCEdSKMkdU

You may sadly be right about that brother. How we have let a bunch bureaucrats and lawyers declare war on the American People in this country is beyond me. At this point reclaiming our government may literally take civil war. These cowards would change their war cries if they were the ones to face true "enemy" combatants. There simply are no bureaucrats or lawyers on a battlefield, yet they are the cause of most wars today.

It's been nearly a century since these same elitists tried to float their criminal prohibition scheme constitutionally (1919 18th Amendment). In a democracy past (pre-lawfare) the People were able to fight back against that atrocity constitutionally/democratically (1933 21st Amendment) with the first and last repeal. So they changed the game to keep on keeping on ...

This modern day lawfare we face that bypasses the Constitution into "the rule of law" is a cancer that is untreatable democratically by design. The Controlled Substance Act/War on Drugs is only one example of this malfeasance so common today. The last "Declaration of War" by this country was in December 1941 and that war only lasted a couple years before victory ...

Where does one enlist in the MMMP Special Forces to return fire in this cowards war?

 

[ttystikk]

Civil war will only make them feel justified in murdering innocents by the thousands/millions.

They and their crimes must be publicly EXPOSED for the poison they are against society. That's what they fear most, and that's what they must face.

 

[TheMan13]

Civil war will only make them feel justified in murdering innocents by the thousands/millions.

They and their crimes must be publicly EXPOSED for the poison they are against society. That's what they fear most, and that's what they must face.

But the bullshit that occurs in a courthouse today is far from public and definitely not transparent or accountable. They fear nothing under a "justice system" they have complete control over and never will until The People fight back. How has relying on the civil courts and civil rights enforcement as checks and balances served us under this current "justice system"?

If SWAT teams showing up at patients homes talking about the smell of fresh marijuana as probable cause to raid, search and seize faced the MMMP Special Forces to defend against this unjust use of force and drug war prior to the courtroom, the game changes no? Just civil disobedience by a "suspect" is "resisting arrest" and subject to a justifiable homicide verdict onsite under this "justice system". Although a communities civil disobedience (MMMP Special Forces) in protection of fellow citizens is a wholly different Constitutionally protected game. Is simple protest even possible in the face of declared war ...

 

[ttystikk]

Yes, so an essential component is to disallow the Fed from building castles to their brand of 'lawfare', which is leading to fascism.

The whole point of courts is to have a public hearing of events. A private court is by definition, unjust.

 

[reasonevangelist]

Civil war will only make them feel justified in murdering innocents by the thousands/millions.

They and their crimes must be publicly EXPOSED for the poison they are against society. That's what they fear most, and that's what they must face.

And their feelings of justification will in turn justify their own deaths, at the hands of those who refuse to allow their transgressions to continue.

IMO, they have already far exceeded the requirements for being forcibly removed. The only problem is that they have better weapons and better organization; "tyranny is always better organized."

They have already given all of us all the justification we need, to employ self-defense measures, by any means necessary.

They have invalidated their own "law" system. They may insist it is "the law of the land," but i disagree. And i think a lot of people would agree with my disagreement.

Now, if we could just get everyone on the same page...

 

[GregS]

And their feelings of justification will in turn justify their own deaths, at the hands of those who refuse to allow their transgressions to continue.

IMO, they have already far exceeded the requirements for being forcibly removed. The only problem is that they have better weapons and better organization; "tyranny is always better organized."

They have already given all of us all the justification we need, to employ self-defense measures, by any means necessary.

They have invalidated their own "law" system. They may insist it is "the law of the land," but i disagree. And i think a lot of people would agree with my disagreement.

Now, if we could just get everyone on the same page...

Keep in mind that herding cats is far easier than getting everybody on the same page. That pesky democracy thing you know.

 

[TheMan13]

Yes, so an essential component is to disallow the Fed from building castles to their brand of 'lawfare', which is leading to fascism.

The whole point of courts is to have a public hearing of events. A private court is by definition, unjust.

Yes indeed brother!

But that's exactly how under our Constitution and "the rule of law" this "justice system" has somehow been able to hijack our government over this past century right under our noses. It is the incremental "legal precedents" of bastardizing and politicizing "the rule of law" that are the building blocks of this fascist castle which needs to be razed. How is it even possible that our "justice system" could have gotten to the point that it could insinuate a declaration of war upon The People based on a criminal substance prohibition scheme clearly rejected by both the People and the Constitution? This act alone should have faced international courts as the war crime it is, but rather these lawyers somehow sold this criminal prohibition to the entire world under the treaty game being manufactured at this same time. Bullshit legal precedents stacked upon bullshit legal precedents will begin to fall any day now somewhere in this world. My guess is that Russia may soon expose NATO and the UN for the fraud they've become. WWIII may begin in Europe, but the collapse of this lawfare will expose these schemes to the world over, as it will the cowards selling and responsible for them ...

 

[reasonevangelist]

Keep in mind that herding cats is far easier than getting everybody on the same page. That pesky democracy thing you know.

Yes, mob rule is indeed problematic; especially when the mob is deliberately prevented from learning all the relevant information, and most of them are never taught to critically think, but rather, are discouraged from it.

 

[TheMan13]

Yes, mob rule is indeed problematic; especially when the mob is deliberately prevented from learning all the relevant information, and most of them are never taught to critically think, but rather, are discouraged from it.

I'd have to agree that the Democratic and Republican parties today act a lot like the mob holding territory at all cost. I personally never saw much of a difference between the goals of Occupy Wall Street and The Tea Party in the end. Both fought the principle of regulatory capture, or the basis of power bought and sold by the Democratic and Republican parties whom have clearly hijacked our democracy by dividing The People ...

Regulatory capture is a form of political corruption that occurs when a regulatory agency, created to act in the public interest, instead advances the commercial or special concerns of interest groups that dominate the industry or sector it is charged with regulating. Regulatory capture is a form of government failure; it creates an opening for firms to behave in ways injurious to the public (e.g., producing negative externalities). The agencies are called "captured agencies".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture

How did we get from unionizing manufacturing laborers to share in value added profit to unionizing tens of thousands of lawyers within the US Department of Justice

 

[cephalopod]

Regulatory capture is a form of political corruption that occurs when a regulatory agency, created to act in the public interest, instead advances the commercial or special concerns of interest groups that dominate the industry or sector it is charged with regulating. Regulatory capture is a form of government failure; it creates an opening for firms to behave in ways injurious to the public (e.g., producing negative externalities). The agencies are called "captured agencies".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture

H.B.4271 anyone?