It's the Winds Man, It's the Winds Fault

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
Just because everything you say about yourself is bullshit doesn't make it ok to make shit up about other people beenthere.
Dude, really, you need to get some more material and think for yourself.
Followers are always behind.
I'm not beenthere, no mater how many times you idiots repeat the same old stupid shit.
You get frustrated and pissed, if calling me a banned member is all you got, lame.:oops:
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
I'm not frustrated or pissed. I'm thoroughly amused beenthere.
Dude, you are so pissed off right now it isn't funny, well, yes it is.
will it make you feel better if will all agree with you that the polar bears are dying off and the polar ice caps are missing?
 

heckler73

Well-Known Member
Dude, you are so pissed off right now it isn't funny, well, yes it is.
will it make you feel better if will all agree with you that the polar bears are dying off and the polar ice caps are missing?
But the polar bears aren't dying off...they're thriving, I last heard.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/polar-bears-threatened-species-or-political-pawn-1.2753645
The methodology they use to measure the population is pretty loose (based on catch and release stats).

The Polar Bear Specialist Group's estimate of 25,000 polar bears currently left on the planet is in fact the highest figure proposed since researchers began attempting to count their numbers.

The international consortium of scientists has recently backed away from that number, however.

Dag Vongraven, chairman of the PBSG, writes in an email that a footnote will be added to information on polar bear populations provided by the group.

“As part of past status reports, the PBSG has traditionally estimated a range for the total number of polar bears in the circumpolar Arctic," the statement says.

"Since 2005, this range has been 20-25,000. It is important to realize that this range never has been an estimate of total abundance in a scientific sense, but simply a qualified guess given to satisfy public demand.


In the end, different scientists, different opinions, different agendas.
Check out the premium for Polar Bear hides in light of the recent debate to make Ursus maritimus an endangered species.
Some Nunavut hunters are going to make an unusual profit from that exchange ...it'll help offset the losses from seal product embargoes.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Polar bear populations are increasing because hunting them has been restricted since 1973 and even banned in many places.

Keep bringing up the talking points though.
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
Ancient Turtle Migrated from Asia to America Over a Tropical Arctic

Fossil Find Suggests CO2 a Possible Culprit in Warm, Freshwater Arctic


In Arctic Canada, a team of geologists from the University of Rochester has discovered a surprise fossil: a tropical, freshwater, Asian turtle.

The find strongly suggests that animals migrated from Asia to North America not around Alaska, as once thought, but directly across a freshwater sea floating atop the warm, salty Arctic Ocean.

Published today in the journal Geology, the finding also suggests that a rapid influx of carbon dioxide some 90 million years ago was the likely cause of a super-greenhouse effect that created extraordinary polar heat.http://www.rochester.edu/news/show.php?id=3311



Rising co2, a super greenhouse effect and global warming 90 million years ago.
Damn, no fucking peer reviews or carbon credits
, WTF?

 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Ancient Turtle Migrated from Asia to America Over a Tropical Arctic

Fossil Find Suggests CO2 a Possible Culprit in Warm, Freshwater Arctic

In Arctic Canada, a team of geologists from the University of Rochester has discovered a surprise fossil: a tropical, freshwater, Asian turtle.

The find strongly suggests that animals migrated from Asia to North America not around Alaska, as once thought, but directly across a freshwater sea floating atop the warm, salty Arctic Ocean.

Published today in the journal Geology, the finding also suggests that a rapid influx of carbon dioxide some 90 million years ago was the likely cause of a super-greenhouse effect that created extraordinary polar heat.http://www.rochester.edu/news/show.php?id=3311



Rising co2, a super greenhouse effect and global warming 90 million years ago.
Damn, no fucking peer reviews or carbon credits
, WTF?
I like how you never replied about that dogshit citation in the other thread
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Ancient Turtle Migrated from Asia to America Over a Tropical Arctic

Fossil Find Suggests CO2 a Possible Culprit in Warm, Freshwater Arctic

In Arctic Canada, a team of geologists from the University of Rochester has discovered a surprise fossil: a tropical, freshwater, Asian turtle.

The find strongly suggests that animals migrated from Asia to North America not around Alaska, as once thought, but directly across a freshwater sea floating atop the warm, salty Arctic Ocean.

Published today in the journal Geology, the finding also suggests that a rapid influx of carbon dioxide some 90 million years ago was the likely cause of a super-greenhouse effect that created extraordinary polar heat.http://www.rochester.edu/news/show.php?id=3311



Rising co2, a super greenhouse effect and global warming 90 million years ago.
Damn, no fucking peer reviews or carbon credits
, WTF?
So greenhouse gasses caused a warm arctic. So you're telling me, that a runaway greenhouse effect caused an ultrawarm arctic. So what you're saying is, greenhouse gasses made the arctic as warm as florida. So in other words, CO2 in the atmosphere led to a tropical arctic. What you really mean is, greenhouse gasses caused the arctic to be as warm as the caribbean. So what I should understand from this is that a runaway greenhouse effect caused the arctic to be warm like vietnam. So what this suggests is that CO2 in the atmosphere caused a runaway greenhouse effect that took the earth several million years to recover from. So what you mean is, we can cause this very same thing, since it has happened naturally before.

What's another permian extinction going to do to our species? Fuck it, keep it up...
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
So greenhouse gasses caused a warm arctic. So you're telling me, that a runaway greenhouse effect caused an ultrawarm arctic. So what you're saying is, greenhouse gasses made the arctic as warm as florida. So in other words, CO2 in the atmosphere led to a tropical arctic. What you really mean is, greenhouse gasses caused the arctic to be as warm as the caribbean. So what I should understand from this is that a runaway greenhouse effect caused the arctic to be warm like vietnam. So what this suggests is that CO2 in the atmosphere caused a runaway greenhouse effect that took the earth several million years to recover from. So what you mean is, we can cause this very same thing, since it has happened naturally before.

What's another permian extinction going to do to our species? Fuck it, keep it up...
Dude, I'm not telling you a thing.
It's science.:lol:
 
Top