It's been harvested and a whole other run has taken place. There is a yield video and a lab results in here somewhere...you'll had to go back a few pages or go to my YouTube channel.These should be closing in to harvest soon, I'm hoping you'll share some photos or a video soon!
These should be closing in to harvest soon, I'm hoping you'll share some photos or a video soon!
It's been harvested and a whole other run has taken place. There is a yield video and a lab results in here somewhere...you'll had to go back a few pages or go to my YouTube channel.
Killer.... Those the same lights or different?Thanks man. Glad you liked it.
I used mags when I had a warehouse. Reliable and no RF.
LED's are in the game for sure now. And only getting better by the day it seems. Costly at firsts but after years of perfect operation and much lower monthly power dues...they pay off no prob, even these expensive ass lights.
Not sure if you saw/came across the grow I just did...
And I got the next one vegging out right now.
Dude only pulled 677 grams off a 1k hps? He should have been able to pull over 900 grams with a 1k.
Not to mention the fact that we're on V2 of the COBsNot according to my experience. Top shelf bud in organic soil, testing 25%, clean bud. .66 gpw not bad at all.
But how much he pulled is completely beside the point, the comparison between the lamps is what matters. This is the ultimate way to compare the efficacy of 2 lamps so this is a critical data point.
Another way to look at it, if you think you could have got .9 gpw with that HPS, then you would have got 1.3 gpw with that LED.
All radiant energy emitted by any lamp is eventually converted to heat. So they are not wrong, you are.I just want to say thank you again for this. You rock and are 1 of the few at RIU I respect. I use your thread to show heat issues and how led uses way less heat. I have a few arguing with me that a watt is a watt and the heat is the same. I just tell them they are wrong.
Your welcome.I just want to say thank you again for this. You rock and are 1 of the few at RIU I respect. I use your thread to show heat issues and how led uses way less heat. I have a few arguing with me that a watt is a watt and the heat is the same. I just tell them they are wrong.
Now it is my understanding that the 850nm heat wave can be beneficial for driving plants to transpire. One led company actually was telling me that best performance would be seen by incorporating a small amount of hps (150w) with led.Your welcome.
But they are correct. All watts are converted to heat. The benefit is that with higher efficiency more is light before it is heat so you can use less wattage to accomplish the same amount of light.
It's that less wattage that gives LEDs lower heat.
Another thing is that hps emits strong 850nm (heat) that is felt in the beam and on the canopy.
25% makes me dizzy.Not according to my experience. Top shelf bud in organic soil, testing 25%, clean bud. .66 gpw not bad at all.
But how much he pulled is completely beside the point, the comparison between the lamps is what matters. This is the ultimate way to compare the efficacy of 2 lamps so this is a critical data point.
Another way to look at it, if you think you could have got .9 gpw with that HPS, then you would have got 1.3 gpw with that LED.