So i was looking at this chart for hydro and i know most places i read say the ideal PH is around 5.6-5.9 somewhere in that range. it seems to me that (according to the pic) the ideal range would fall more into the 5.0-5.3 range?
you can see around 5.5 to 6 range the nitrogen, potassium, calcium and magnesium begin to taper off, as does phosphorus but from the other end of the spectrum.
it appears that, unlike soil, right around the 5.0-5.3 ph range, nearly everything is available at near peak levels. phosphorus is near a peak, nitrogen peaks back up after its taper off, calicium and magnesium do the same. everything on that chart is near peaked except molybdenum which is at the lower end of it's taper off spectrum.
I'm in my 2nd round of DWC right now and have always been a soil grower years prior, so i'm in my beginning learning stages of hydro and everything related to it involving PH levels. does anyone have any thoughts or input as to my thoughts that i should run my ph around 5.0-5.3 range instead of the hovering around 5.6-6.0 range? and becuase most people run in the 5.5-6 range could that possibly be why a lot of people feel they need to supplement with calmag (not because there is not enough in their nutrients, but because their PH range is not ideal for cal/mag uptake as it chokes off big time in this 5.5-6 range)
here is the pic:
you can see around 5.5 to 6 range the nitrogen, potassium, calcium and magnesium begin to taper off, as does phosphorus but from the other end of the spectrum.
it appears that, unlike soil, right around the 5.0-5.3 ph range, nearly everything is available at near peak levels. phosphorus is near a peak, nitrogen peaks back up after its taper off, calicium and magnesium do the same. everything on that chart is near peaked except molybdenum which is at the lower end of it's taper off spectrum.
I'm in my 2nd round of DWC right now and have always been a soil grower years prior, so i'm in my beginning learning stages of hydro and everything related to it involving PH levels. does anyone have any thoughts or input as to my thoughts that i should run my ph around 5.0-5.3 range instead of the hovering around 5.6-6.0 range? and becuase most people run in the 5.5-6 range could that possibly be why a lot of people feel they need to supplement with calmag (not because there is not enough in their nutrients, but because their PH range is not ideal for cal/mag uptake as it chokes off big time in this 5.5-6 range)
here is the pic: