You're not...
Krugman is a professor of Economics at Princeton, he won the John Bates Clark Medal in 1991, the Princess of Asturias Award in 1998 and the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2008, he has a BA from Yale and a PhD from MIT (where he used to be a professor), he's also taught at Stanford and the London School of Economics. He's written over 20 books and authored over 200 papers on economics
Piketty has won the Yrjö Jahnsson Award in 2013 and the Prix du meilleur jeune économiste de France in 2002. He is professor at the École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS) and professor at the Paris School of Economics. He previously taught economics at MIT as well
Believing you're smarter than they are is the epitome of arrogance and automatically invalidates your opinions
To be perfectly clear, this isn't an appeal to authority as their ideas and opinions very clearly speak for themselves, I've used Pikettys work to support my reasoning this entire thread, not his academic achievements which were only brought up to illustrate you're not at all on the same level intellectually speaking regarding economics
"The central thesis of his book Capital in the Twenty-First Century is that when the rate of return on capital (r) is greater than the rate of economic growth (g) over the long term, the result is concentration of wealth, and this unequal distribution of wealth causes social and economic instability. Piketty proposes a global system of progressive wealth taxes to help reduce inequality and avoid the vast majority of wealth coming under the control of a tiny minority."
"The book argues that there was a trend towards higher inequality which was reversed between 1930 and 1975 due to some rather unique circumstances: the two World Wars, the Great Depression and a debt-fueled recession destroyed much wealth, particularly that owned by the elite. These events prompted governments to undertake steps towards redistributing income, especially in the post-World War II period. The fast economic growth of that time reduced the importance of inherited wealth.
The book argues that the world today is returning towards "patrimonial capitalism", in which much of the economy is dominated by inherited wealth: Their power is increasing, creating an oligarchy.Piketty cites novels by Honoré de Balzac, Jane Austen and Henry James to describe the rigid class structure based on accumulated capital that existed in England and France in the early 1800s."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_in_the_Twenty-First_Century
that is 100% the definition of Appeal To Authority.
both those chuckleheads espouse THEORIES which are entirely unprovable in macroeconomics (as all macroeconomic theories are) but fail miserably in the only economic laboratory that counts for anything.
it busts budgets, drives unsustainable debt and results in collapse, bankruptcy and utter failure every time it is tried in the real world.
macroeconomics is a fantasyland where anything can happen and all theories are equally pointless.
you have not used anyone's reasoning in this thread, since all you have done is blame the economic woes of the Occupytards on "Teh 1%"
if the assertions made in your piketty and krugman videos is the sum of their work, then they are both dolts who couldnt run a taco bell much less an economy.
insisting they must be right because they gots sum sheep skins, then why are the assertions made by the austrian and chicago school economists so readily dismissed by you, despite the Chicago School dropping Nobel Prizes like party favours at their semi-annual fiscal responsibility keggers?
because you picked a side, and are now sporting a terrible case of Right Fight, in conjunction with your Appeal To Authority, God Of The Gaps and Texas Sharpshooter fallacies.
real world economics works.
phony buffleheaded idiocy based on a Magic Banker's Hat that creates fiat money out of thin air, endless debt, usury taxation and bloated government waste doesnt get you anything except the Wiemar Republic, Zimbabwe and the new hotness, Obamanomics.
if you think that shit has ever, or could ever work, then youre as stupid as krugman and frenchy.