Thanks Obama!

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
That's cool, it still doesn't invalidate anything I've said. Would you like to try to refute what I've actually said instead of resorting to logical fallacies?
saying youre full of shit based on your bullshit claims on the interwebs about how youre a billionaire playboy fighter pilot race car driver astronaut scientist cowboy who gets paid to sexually satisfy supermodels isnt a logical fallacy.

if you knew what a logical fallacy was, you wouldnt say such stupid things.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
saying youre full of shit based on your bullshit claims on the interwebs about how youre a billionaire playboy fighter pilot race car driver astronaut scientist cowboy who gets paid to sexually satisfy supermodels isnt a logical fallacy.

if you knew what a logical fallacy was, you wouldnt say such stupid things.
i bet he makes more hourly than you do.

you two should post paystubs to find out.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
saying youre full of shit based on your bullshit claims on the interwebs about how youre a billionaire playboy fighter pilot race car driver astronaut scientist cowboy who gets paid to sexually satisfy supermodels isnt a logical fallacy.

if you knew what a logical fallacy was, you wouldnt say such stupid things.
I wasn't aware saying "I live in an apartment in Los Angeles" is equivalent to "billionaire playboy fighter pilot race car driver astronaut scientist cowboy". I never said I live an exorbitant lifestyle, just that I don't live with my mom. Do you?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I wasn't aware saying "I live in an apartment in Los Angeles" is equivalent to "billionaire playboy fighter pilot race car driver astronaut scientist cowboy". I never said I live an exorbitant lifestyle, just that I don't live with my mom. Do you?
not as of a few months ago, but he's only 50 years old.
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
Do it manually

If you weren't willing to do it manually, why did you bring up a claim which you knew would require proof? Are you an idiot?

I work for much more than minimum wage no matter how much you wish I didn't
What do you mean manually?

I'm glad you are doing good, why wouldn't I want you to make as much money as you could???
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
then why did you get slowed down several days after GWN (whose name appears in 7 variations on stormfront) made clear that calling people snitches was OK and i stopped bothering to report it?

woooooooops.
A total fabrication.
Ask potroast when I got put in slow mode, it was October 21st
for using "inappropriate language" while replying to you.
The exact term was "you were wearing f...ing beer goggles"

So I got one warning for using the same language you do on a daily basis, and have been in slow mode for over 3 weeks.

Winning much?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
What do you mean manually?

I'm glad you are doing good, why wouldn't I want you to make as much money as you could???
Go find where I reported another member without using the search function

I would assume because you don't like me or my opinions
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member

A total fabrication.
Ask potroast when I got put in slow mode, it was October 21st
for using "inappropriate language" while replying to you.
The exact term was "you were wearing f...ing beer goggles"

So I got one warning for using the same language you do on a daily basis, and have been in slow mode for over 3 weeks.

Winning much?
let's try an experiment then.

should i post pictures of your whorish looking slut wife banging several black dudes and see if i get put into slowdown mode?

because i do have pictures of her.

i might even print a few out, jizz on them, and post them for everyone to see.

just let me know, steven.
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
let's try an experiment then.

should i post pictures of your whorish looking slut wife banging several black dudes and see if i get put into slowdown mode?

because i do have pictures of her.

i might even print a few out, jizz on them, and post them for everyone to see.

just let me know, steven.
Sure, you have my unconditional permission to post pictures of Steve's wife.
Get posting.
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
Here's what amazes me about you UnclIeBuck.
You have all this time and energy to save information on members you don't even personally know.
And, you take it so personal (internet forums) that it consumes you, it's an everyday occurrence, this forum has to be a major part of your life for you to go through all this trouble.

It just occurred to me that you think of this all stuff offline, you honestly let this crap get to you in real life!

That's not healthy brudda, it's the internet, it's not real, it's make believe for the rest of us..
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
Go find where I reported another member without using the search function

I would assume because you don't like me or my opinions
What do you mean I don't like you, I don't even know you, get real, if you and I met, I'd burn with you, for sure.

But I will admit, your ideology needs a fixin.
 

heckler73

Well-Known Member
The wait might be something with aligning antenna or burst transmissions.
The probe is still sending valuable info
:lol: indeed. A varying magnetic field could cause some disruptive communication, but not likely at such a loooooooooong wavelength.
However, I could stretch my imagination a bit and make room for a possible occlusion of Rosetta from Philae's PoV, but...

As for the valuable info? Oh sure... I can say the same thing. Now when you ask me to produce it...?Ahhhh, but the ESA has a "6-12 month" period of "proprietorship" before they'll let us see what they know. I can accept that, but not a complete, info blackout in the meantime.

If one wishes to argue the 64hr battery life (before requiring solar recharge for 1hr bumps) is a factor, how much "energy" is required to take another pic at 2048x2048? A microwatt? A milliwatt? I can't remember off-hand how much power is needed to read a CCD. And from some "over-the-shoulder" photos I've seen, they have the cameras running...


Again, I'll just patiently wait for the update, and see what's up. But after a "bounce" and presumption of landing (with no attachment), it'll be interesting to see what "info" is so valuable.
Hell, they're probably burning the battery reading the accelerometers, while trying to figure out how to get it to stay on there, after fruitlessly using their "ice drills" on regolith. :lol:


PS. Someone sketched up a plot for the first and second "jumps" Philae made.

Just a little 450m hop. :lol: There's probably some error in there, but he apparently rechecked G(ravity) calcs in 15 second intervals, so it should be a reasonable approximation if the times provided are accurate.

You're an idiot


Gee, that's the nicest thing anybody's said to me all day! Let's just see what they update us with tomorrow, okay? It's obvious their original plans were screwed over, because they were wrong about what comets were made of. The micro-gravity may be enough to keep it on there, though; in which case, they will be able to study it (for a while).
But for your bemusement, "34 science academies! SCIENCEE!!!111!!1!@1"
 
Last edited:
Top