Instead Of Opening Your Mouth..You Should Close Your Legs First..

[UncleBuck]

I followed the link in one of your previous posts and it was a veritable cavalcade of liberal talking points.

then cite it so we can see how far detached from reality you are.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

then cite it so we can see how far detached from reality you are.

You said "studies", not me. As you and your ilk always say, citation or you're a liar.

 

[UncleBuck]

You said "studies", not me. As you and your ilk always say, citation or you're a liar.

i looked at multiple studies, couldn't find one with a "cavalcade of liberal talking points". you made that claim, care to cite it now?

 

[MuyLocoNC]

i looked at multiple studies, couldn't find one with a "cavalcade of liberal talking points". you made that claim, care to cite it now?

Citation and links or pure bullshit.

 

[UncleBuck]

Citation and links or pure bullshit.

that's not how burden of proof works.

you claimed that there existed a study with "a cavalcade of liberal talking points".

since you made the claim, you get to cite it.

i already cited the exact questions for the study that proves that fox news viewers are less informed than those who watch no news at all.

your turn, princess.

don't make a liar out of yourself by chickenshitting out of this one too.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

that's not how burden of proof works.

you claimed that there existed a study with "a cavalcade of liberal talking points".

since you made the claim, you get to cite it.

i already cited the exact questions for the study that proves that fox news viewers are less informed than those who watch no news at all.

your turn, princess.

don't make a liar out of yourself by chickenshitting out of this one too.

Nice try dipshit. We aren't moving an inch until the FIRST claim of "studies" is proven. Especially, since you cited ONE as proof I was wrong about all of them. Once you have produced ALL the "studies", then we will see if I'm full of shit or not on my subsequent claim.

Everyone reading this already knows you lied about "studies" and have been backpeddling since. That's how the burden of proof actually works.

 

[UncleBuck]

Nice try dipshit. We aren't moving an inch until the FIRST claim of "studies" is proven. Especially, since you cited ONE as proof I was wrong about all of them. Once you have produced ALL the "studies", then we will see if I'm full of shit or not on my subsequent claim.

Everyone reading this already knows you lied about "studies" and have been backpeddling since. That's how the burden of proof actually works.

you're just trying to use that as an excuse because you're full of shit.

you need to support my claim whether or not i cite multiple studies, princess!

but just so that you no longer have any excuses to hide behind, here is another study done the next year by farleigh dickinson asking about the same questions, minus the one about which party has more occupy wall street people in it.

http://publicmind.fdu.edu/2012/confirmed/final.pdf

the great part is that it shows the repeatability of the study with the results coming out the exact same! fox news viewers still come out knowing less than those who watch no news at all!

so quit dragging your feet you fucking retard and cite your claim!

 

[UncleBuck]

Nice try asshole. Same study, same questions, same source. Just fucking admit that you have one study from one organization that you represented as multiple studies and we can move on. I'll check back tomorrow to see if you've dug yourself out of this lie.

I have my citation waiting, ready to go. This is a rare opportunity for you, I normally tell you to go fuck yourself on citation requests. Not today. Pull just one more study that is from a different organization and you'll have the golden ticket.

no, those are two STUDIES, performed on two sets of people, in two different years, with different sets of questions.

one was done in 2011, one was done in 2012. both STUDIES found the same thing: fox news viewers are less informed than those who watch no news at all.

you have jackshit. you are hiding like a little bitch coward who can't back up his own claims.

i won't be surprised when you continue to hide like a little bitch.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

no, those are two STUDIES, performed on two sets of people, in two different years, with different sets of questions.

one was done in 2011, one was done in 2012. both STUDIES found the same thing: fox news viewers are less informed than those who watch no news at all.

you have jackshit. you are hiding like a little bitch coward who can't back up his own claims.

i won't be surprised when you continue to hide like a little bitch.

Nice try ringworm.

Same study, same questions, conducted by the same jackasses. If they cherry picked respondents to suit their agenda one year, it doesn't give the study any extra validation because the same assholes decided to do it again.

Simply back up your claim by providing a study by a different organization (with no affiliation to the first set of liberal douchebags) and you get your prize.

 

[UncleBuck]

Nice try ringworm.

Same study, same questions, conducted by the same jackasses. If they cherry picked respondents to suit their agenda one year, it doesn't give the study any extra validation because the same assholes decided to do it again.

Simply back up your claim by providing a study by a different organization (with no affiliation to the first set of liberal douchebags) and you get your prize.

nice try at moving the goalposts.

i posted two separate STUDIES from two different years scientifically polling two different sets of people.

i am not surprised to see that you once again FAIL at citing any of the bullshit that falls out of your fool mouth.

loser.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

nice try at moving the goalposts.

i posted two separate STUDIES from two different years scientifically polling two different sets of people.

i am not surprised to see that you once again FAIL at citing any of the bullshit that falls out of your fool mouth.

loser.

So, you're saying you really only have one study from the same gaggle of liberal douchebags, done at different times, but with identical questions. Sounds like a continuation of the same study. Maybe in the future you should say, "one study from a group of liberal douchebags, done over two years, says Fox viewers..."

You don't win the prize, you don't pass GO, you don't collect $200. No citation for you. Thanks for playing.

 

[Dr Kynes]

So, you're saying you really only have one study from the same gaggle of liberal douchebags, done at different times, but with identical questions. Sounds like a continuation of the same study. Maybe in the future you should say, "one study from a group of liberal douchebags, done over two years, says Fox viewers..."

You don't win the prize, you don't pass GO, you don't collect $200. No citation for you. Thanks for playing.

but it's not even a "study"

it's an opinion poll

it has less validity than a Tonight Show "Jay Walking" segment.

 

[schuylaar]

Nice try ringworm.

Same study, same questions, conducted by the same jackasses. If they cherry picked respondents to suit their agenda one year, it doesn't give the study any extra validation because the same assholes decided to do it again.

Simply back up your claim by providing a study by a different organization (with no affiliation to the first set of liberal douchebags) and you get your prize.

So, you're saying you really only have one study from the same gaggle of liberal douchebags, done at different times, but with identical questions. Sounds like a continuation of the same study. Maybe in the future you should say, "one study from a group of liberal douchebags, done over two years, says Fox viewers..."

You don't win the prize, you don't pass GO, you don't collect $200. No citation for you. Thanks for playing.

would you describe yourself as being an angry, young black man?

 

[UncleBuck]

So, you're saying you really only have one study from the same gaggle of liberal douchebags, done at different times, but with identical questions. Sounds like a continuation of the same study. Maybe in the future you should say, "one study from a group of liberal douchebags, done over two years, says Fox viewers..."

You don't win the prize, you don't pass GO, you don't collect $200. No citation for you. Thanks for playing.

two studies with two different sets of questions done in two different years on two different sets of people.

no not surprised to see you pussy out, reality denier.

 

[UncleBuck]

but it's not even a "study"

it's an opinion poll

it has less validity than a Tonight Show "Jay Walking" segment.

it is a scientific poll actually, replete with a margin of error. but i wouldn't expect a skinhead who can't even do exponents to understand that!

and "which party has the most seats in the house of representatives right now?" is not an example of a question that one would ask on an opinion poll, dicksqueezer.

make yourself useful and keep the hostess section at walmart stocked, kkkynes.

 

[Dr Kynes]

would you describe yourself as being an angry, young black man?

he isnt out on the town looting the local Footlocker for a dozen pairs of Jordans so clearly not.

 

[kelly4]

Dey stil makez Jordans?! Dozwr flie!

 

[MuyLocoNC]

two studies with two different sets of questions done in two different years on two different sets of people.

no not surprised to see you pussy out, reality denier.

Well, the questions you listed in your earlier post were IDENTICAL to the questions listed in your link to a supposed SECOND study. Done by the same biased, liberal fucksticks a few months later. Only you and a few of your bootlickers would try to pass that off as "studies".

It's obviously a continuation of the same study. You really are horrible at this.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

would you describe yourself as being an angry, young black man?

Nah, I'm a happy, middleaged, white dude. Originally from Hunnington Beach CA and living a well deserved easy life here in NC. I hate no one, but I find the religious right and almost the entirety of the left, reprehensible.

 

[schuylaar]

Dey stil makez Jordans?! Dozwr flie!

wuz wondering myself