Clint Howard
Clint Howard
stupid fucking NASA thinks they're so smart.
Well well well you seem to be a "Global Staying the same/Cooling Denialist"LMFAO!!!!!
17 years proves it!!!!!!!!
Not the centuries of data collected that prove you're a GOP denialist retard
Holy shit, this is too good!
PS dum dum, like I told you before, NASA supports ACC, anything you find at NASA to try to discredit it shows your enormous lack of reading comprehension and illustrates your inability to understand how the fuck science actually works
Go tell Dawkins how you know evolution is a hoax, dipshit
in case you haven't been keeping up, it's the righties making stupid statements like that and the lefties correcting themWhat kind of dumb ass left wing shit talker would ever say something so stupid:
Let me get you AC's rebuttal to that proposed Milankovitch cycle hypothesis.Well well well you seem to be a "Global Staying the same/Cooling Denialist"
Pre 17 years ago, [how old were you 12-13?] you may not understand, it was bad, things were going to shit, global warming was real!
Now, with no warming, you and others like you with a mind set set in stone, refuse to even consider the opposite effect that is happening... No new Global Warming...
You want new taxes to curb the problem that does not exist...
You my fellow poster are a true climate change denier:
This is how it works:
http://www.sciencecourseware.org/eec/GlobalWarming/Tutorials/Milankovitch/
Way back on page 28, lots of AC butthurt when it came to Milokovitch.I refuse to read something you have not read.
You copy/pasted half a wikipedia page you dolt.Let me get you AC's rebuttal to that proposed Milankovitch cycle hypothesis.
Way back on page 28, lots of AC butthurt when it came to Milokovitch.
And then you cried and wept like a little baby because your challenge was accepted, and then obliterated, making you look like a fool.You copy/pasted half a wikipedia page you dolt.
you made me look like a fool by copy pasting half a wikipedia page you didn't even read...And then you cried and wept like a little baby because your challenge was accepted, and then obliterated, making you look like a fool.
And here you are crying about it all once again.
they dont attribute the loss of northern ice and the increase in southern ice to human action because THEY CANT.NASA thinks ice melts are natural variations. They are very careful with their language, if one listens astutely. "Climate Change is Real--says Walt Meier of..."
Note the lack of attribution to humans. And this is what I have consistently witnessed in my observations of them.
NASA thinks ice melts are natural variations. They are very careful with their language, if one listens astutely. "Climate Change is Real--says Walt Meier of..."
Note the lack of attribution to humans. And this is what I have consistently witnessed in my observations of them.
now who is distorting the NASA position?
http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
"Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position."
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
Why are you purposefully trying to distort what NASA says about ACC? It seems to me they're very clear in their stance on it.
You already conceded defeat, are you back for round 2? Think anyone cares?you made me look like a fool by copy pasting half a wikipedia page you didn't even read...
AllYou already conceded defeat, are you back for round 2? Think anyone cares?
Yep, but it sure shut you up quick, then you started crying because the defeat was obviously ego crushing in its effectiveness.All
You
Did
Was
Copy
Paste
Half
Of
A
Wikipedia
Page
That
You
Didn't
Even
Read
and you still think it is a significant contribution to the thread...
I directly linked the image.. Here's another edit with interesting conclusions;now who is distorting the NASA position?
"The current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is very likely human-induced and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented in the past 1,300 years."It is likely that this trend is partially due to human activities, although many uncertainties remain, particularly relating to estimates of natural variability.
between the milenkovic cycles, volcanic activity, termite farts, the ongoing 12000 year warming trend, the lack of ethics and rigor at CRU, the un-reproduceable nature of Mann's claims, numerous competing theories, and the highly politicized nature of the argument nobody can say what is or is not going on.
That must be why every other major scientific organization in the world agrees with the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change...NASA is a political organization, and is subject to pressure through funding concerns, the vicious accusations of the global warming proponents, fear of being labeled "One Of The Baddies" or "Climate Deniers" , fear of scorn from assholes with agendas in the press the capitol and the academy, and the popularity of post-modernist self flagellation among dolts like you, NASA is hardy impartial.
Climate change is really a time machine if it keeps continuing like this.I directly linked the image.. Here's another edit with interesting conclusions;
350K - 105° CO2 @ 295PPM, 250K - 105° CO2 @ 270PPM, 140K - 93° CO2 @ 290PPM, Now - 91° CO2 @ 400PPM
Do you notice a trend...?
a new sock puppet. how awesome.Climate change is really a time machine if it keeps continuing like this.
I am not a sock puppet(what ever that means). sifl & oly was a great show though. I'm reading through your post history right now. I don't understand why you have taken to making fun of me. give me a break it's my first day here. Go ask a Moderator i just made this account sillya new sock puppet. how awesome.