churchhaze
Well-Known Member
Using the parts you used, I would have done it like this. (the one you said was probably the best).
However, The reason I strayed away from vero 29 in the first place is because I was designing for a lower tent/box profile. That is the reason I used 4 vero 18 to replace every 2 vero 29 for my newer design (the UFO killer). r-tools actually told me that putting the sources slightly closer together would have provided better temperature distribution, but I went a few milimeters more toward the perimeter. Still pretty close to perfect temperature distribution.
However, The reason I strayed away from vero 29 in the first place is because I was designing for a lower tent/box profile. That is the reason I used 4 vero 18 to replace every 2 vero 29 for my newer design (the UFO killer). r-tools actually told me that putting the sources slightly closer together would have provided better temperature distribution, but I went a few milimeters more toward the perimeter. Still pretty close to perfect temperature distribution.
Now...
Please enlighten me ,with a better way ,placing two COBs in a small case ,
along with heat sink ,drivers ,fan psu and rest ...Give me your plan of better light distribution ,
with these parts .
Or better yet ,do not be restricted by parts .Show me any other or another alternative .
The one leaning towards 'better light power distribution. Please,give or share with me ,
even the slightest of your ideas .
Thank you.
Cheers.