ALIEN TECH

[Dr.Pecker]

Why would we want to have a hive mind? I prefer being my own person, with my own free will.

its more of an example not literal.

 

[grizlbr]

Its the only way to get anything done. Currently we have all company's competing against each other and trying to be the man. Now if all said company's pooled together and weren't as greedy they could make some real breakthroughs. For example what if Tesla and Edison were buddies and shared ideas. maybe it wouldn't have taken 100 years to come up with led or florescent light bulbs.

And we are still back askwards: Conventional schematics show hole flow?

 

[Doer]

its interesting how much you earthlings actually know about us.

Always with the dis-information. You Aliens are such kidders.

 

[Doer]

its more of an example not literal.

An example of not-litteral?

 

[Doer]

And we are still back askwards: Conventional schematics show hole flow?

No hole flow without 4th ordination of Dilitithium, I thought.

 

[Dr.Pecker]

I'm saying we should share ideas and not get so rapped up into business but work together to achieve better.

 

[Dr.Pecker]

And we are still back askwards: Conventional schematics show hole flow?

No hole flow without 4th ordination of Dilitithium, I thought.

What are you talking about?

 

[Dr.Pecker]

 

[Dr.Pecker]

fake

 

[Dr.Pecker]

 

[Doer]

What are you talking about?

I am talking about alien tech, al la Star Trek.

 

[Dr.Pecker]

 

[Dr.Pecker]

Are these people fooled by balloons or is it something else?

 

[Wilksey]

Are these people fooled by balloons or is it something else?

Yea...they're birds.

Migrating. The way they do every year over Philadelphia and the rest of the Atlantic coast flyway.

One of the reasons a lot of folks don't take this shit seriously is because people are too quick to make UFO claims, sincerely or not, over some shit that is obviously NOT a UFO.

Like, for example, that video you posted in post #368 is obviously a very human, terrestrial airplane....unless the UFO is intentionally following FAA aircraft marking standards.

Unless a video shows a detailed craft doing something we can not yet do, due to physics limitations, technological limitations and the like, then it tends not to be worth the time it takes to view. Most of the vids on youtube are shyte.

 

[Dr.Pecker]

Why would tanks be in Antarctica?

 

[Mr. Shine]

At least fucking pecker stays on topic! yeah I agree shart on doer with Gritty runny bits

Wow hahahah

 

[heckler73]

Looking at those Antarctic "tanks", my first thought is SnowCats. And are people still looking for that "hole to the center of the Earth"? I thought that would've been settled by now (it was a digital artifact).

 

[Dr.Pecker]

Looking at those Antarctic "tanks", my first thought is SnowCats. And are people still looking for that "hole to the center of the Earth"? I thought that would've been settled by now (it was a digital artifact).

The hole, I think I remember hearing something about that. Hollow earth or something? The whole thing sounds nutty.

 

[heckler73]

The hole, I think I remember hearing something about that. Hollow earth or something? The whole thing sounds nutty.

It was nutty...this goes back to when Google Earth first started. When one zoomed in on the south pole, there was this black "hole". Needless to say, imaginations ran wild with that. It was just an artifact of the satellite orbit limitations. At least now the artifacts people see are more imaginative, like ancient highways under the ocean, etc.

 

[Mr. Shine]

@Dr pecker
They've asked me to ask you to stop discussing their technology