do you know how hard it is to get on the team for that?We could drive by?
they pick from a long list of college kids for one summer only..
statistically, easier to get into harvard than the weiner mobile.
Infidel no-go zones?
- Thread starter Doer
- Start date
they pick from a long list of college kids for one summer only..
statistically, easier to get into harvard than the weiner mobile.
biggest issue is they feel they are the ONE true religion all others to be cast aside.
a loving, peaceful religion they are not.
so wouldn't that mean it's all of us against one group?: islam
seems they're the only ones, who give a real shit about who you pray to or not.
no one group should have say over another.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
the skinheads and the klan are not worldwide organizations, any more than the hells angels, the crips or the bloods are.
there is no single unifying doctrine for any of these groups.
they are criminal by nature, they have no figleaf of religion to hide behind
political correctness ensures that i can slam the klan or the boneheads or any other radical group to my heart's content, and some states have even passed laws against their symbology (california has a long standing prohibition on wearing klan hoods, for example) yet any condemnation of fundamentalist moslems and their atrocities is greeted with a hail of brickbats and screaming frothing declarations of "That's Racist!!"
religions are NOT races, and even on that score, nobody complains when i take frequent swipes at juggaloes, cuz i guess "the dark carnival" hasnt achieved the respectability of wahhabism yet.
hypocrisy.
Hypocrites indeed.
That's why I don't support "political correctness". It is ALL bullshit used by leftist cunts to justify THEIR personal hate directed at everybody that doesn't share their world view, and especially WHITES.
/finger
Doer
Well-Known Member
Perhaps, not quite yet, and no one has said there are. But, the Feds had to be called because the City turned against Christians in one instance, recently.
So the only way to know for sure, is you and I go down there at midnight and see if we get in the shit. Can we go in to a thick Muslim area and order bacon? Are there Sharia patrols after sundown? This is how it goes in Europe.
Why do you think it is impossible that it is being tried here?
Doer
Well-Known Member
Fugergson is not the moral equivalent to global sunni jihad. And I am not talking about the cops. And I am not talking about turf and organized drug crime. Those are not moral equivalence. If Sharia succeed in moving into Watt there would be hangings in the Street. Sharia is Law. And I am sure, we are being influenced to allow Sharia concepts singled out for a protected class.
Here a Circuit Judge actual mentioned Islamic Law as a mitigation to US law. Slipery slopes are real in our system. And all the coo-coos just say, oh relax it can't be happening here. IIf you seek you shall find the REAL.
http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2014/may/08/blog-posting/florida-democrats-just-voted-impose-sharia-law-wom/
At root of the Florida issue is a dispute between a Tampa Islamic center and some of its ousted trustees. In making a ruling on the case in March 2011, a circuit court judge cited Islamic law, sparking outcry from conservatives. That month, two Republican state lawmakers, Sen. Alan Hays and Rep. Larry Metz, announced they would push for a bill to ban foreign law in Florida courts.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
truthuncensored.net
It starts off innocently enough with them wanting to share a neighborhood with like-minded, religious thinking community dwellers. They slowly grow larger, and incorporate more Muslims into the area, and begin buying up property as fast as it becomes available or leasing it. Then they install their own courts, government, justice and punishment system, Sharia law. At that point threats are aimed at anyone living in the neighborhood that is non-Muslim. These areas have been formed with ‘ethnic cleansing’ harassment tactics; forcing existing residents out of their homes by Muslim provocation and fear of property damage and physical harm. It’s very effective, and the results advantageous to the Muslim community in establishing another ‘no-go Sharia controlled zone.’
In the U.S., Dearborn, Michigan: Over 100,000 Muslims, 45% of the city has settled into their first ‘no-go’ zone. The city and police officials have been sued in many cases that allege discrimination “against Christians” effectively by the authorities applying Sharia law. Dearborn-Dar-al-Islam, (a place governed by Islamic Sharia law). The new idea of ‘no-go’ and ‘no-entry’ is significant, and shockingly being upheld. They provide weapons and guards and government officials in their own societies. They build what they want on their compounds. They have schools inside that their kids are educated in. They are taught their religion in school. No separation of Church (mosque) and State.
http://truthuncensored.net/there-are-muslim-no-go-zones-in-the-usa/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the Meaning of Inner Jihad, I say.
what an excellent fucking source.
you are off your fucking rocker.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you say you CAN slam the klan, but for some reason you end up staking out the same ideology that they do.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you already stated in the very first post of this thread that dearborn has a no-go.
one that apparently @a senile fungus goes thrift shopping in.
do you often argue against yourself and just hope people smarter than yourself won't notice?
cc2012
Well-Known Member
Sharia UK: Couple gets year in jail for putting bacon on mosque door handle.
June 29, 2014 3:04 pm By Robert Spencer
If they had desecrated a church, would they be serving a year in jail? Not in Sharia Britannia. As Pamela Geller says, “while what these kids did was silly, jail time? For a bad joke?” Yes. British officials vie to outdo each other in bowing down to their new overlords.
And while what these kids did was silly, jail time? For a bad joke? – See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/06/uk-18-year-old-girl-jailed-year-putting-slice-bacon-door-handle-mosque.html/#sthash.LZaqAzUn.dpuf
“Pair jailed for Edinburgh’s Central Mosque bacon attack,” BBC, June 20, 2014 (thanks to Pamela Geller):
A teenage girl and 39-year old man who desecrated an Edinburgh mosque by attacking it with strips of bacon have both been jailed.
Chelsea Lambie, 18, from Paisley, was sentenced to 12 months and Douglas Cruikshank, from Galashiels, to nine months.
They attached bacon to door handles and threw strips inside Edinburgh’s Central Mosque on 31 January 2013.
Cruikshank pled guilty. Lambie was found guilty after denying the charges.
Sheriff Alistair Noble, at Edinburgh Sheriff Court, said: “It does not seem to me there is any way to deal with this case other than by custody.”
June 29, 2014 3:04 pm By Robert Spencer
If they had desecrated a church, would they be serving a year in jail? Not in Sharia Britannia. As Pamela Geller says, “while what these kids did was silly, jail time? For a bad joke?” Yes. British officials vie to outdo each other in bowing down to their new overlords.
And while what these kids did was silly, jail time? For a bad joke? – See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/06/uk-18-year-old-girl-jailed-year-putting-slice-bacon-door-handle-mosque.html/#sthash.LZaqAzUn.dpuf
“Pair jailed for Edinburgh’s Central Mosque bacon attack,” BBC, June 20, 2014 (thanks to Pamela Geller):
A teenage girl and 39-year old man who desecrated an Edinburgh mosque by attacking it with strips of bacon have both been jailed.
Chelsea Lambie, 18, from Paisley, was sentenced to 12 months and Douglas Cruikshank, from Galashiels, to nine months.
They attached bacon to door handles and threw strips inside Edinburgh’s Central Mosque on 31 January 2013.
Cruikshank pled guilty. Lambie was found guilty after denying the charges.
Sheriff Alistair Noble, at Edinburgh Sheriff Court, said: “It does not seem to me there is any way to deal with this case other than by custody.”
cc2012
Well-Known Member
Muslim who raped girl, 13, not jailed because his “religion doesn’t teach that sex with a child is wrong” (PICTURED)
By Paul Bentley for the Daily Mail - Published: 19:12, 25 January 2013 | Updated: 12:03, 26 January 2013 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=&authornamef=Paul+Bentley+for+the+Daily+Mail
Ignorant: Adil Rashid (pictured) did not know it was illegal to have sex with a 13-year-old girl
A muslim who raped a 13-year-old girl he groomed on Facebook has been spared a prison sentence after a judge heard he went to an Islamic faith school where he was taught that women are worthless.
Adil Rashid, 18, claimed he was not aware that it was illegal for him to have sex with the girl because his education left him ignorant of British law.
Yesterday Judge Michael Stokes handed Rashid a suspended sentence, saying: ‘Although chronologically 18, it is quite clear from the reports that you are very naive and immature when it comes to sexual matters.’
Earlier Nottingham Crown Court heard that such crimes usually result in a four to seven-year prison sentence.
But the judge said that because Rashid was ‘passive’ and ‘lacking assertiveness’, sending him to jail might cause him ‘more damage than good’.
Rashid, from Birmingham, admitted he had sex with the girl, saying he had been ‘tempted by her’ after they met online.
They initially exchanged messages on Facebook before sending texts and chatting on the phone over a two-month period.
They then met up in Nottingham, where Rashid had booked a room at a Premier Inn.
The girl told police they stayed at the hotel for two hours and had sex after Rashid went to the bathroom and emerged wearing a condom.
Rashid then returned home and went straight to a mosque to pray. He was arrested the following week after the girl confessed what had happened to a school friend, who informed one of her teachers.
He told police he knew the girl was 13 but said he was initially reluctant to have sex before relenting after being seduced.
Earlier the court heard how Rashid had ‘little experience of women’ due to his education at an Islamic school in the UK, which cannot be named for legal reasons.
After his arrest, he told a psychologist that he did not know having sex with a 13-year-old was against the law. The court heard he found it was illegal only when he was informed by a family member.
In other interviews with psychologists, Rashid claimed he had been taught in his school that ‘women are no more worthy than a lollipop that has been dropped on the ground’.
When Judge Stokes said Rashid ‘must have known it was illegal, unless he was going round with his eyes shut’, defence lawyer Laban Leake said reports suggested Rashid had a ‘degree of sexual naivety’.
‘The school he attended, it is not going too far to say, can be described as a closed community and on this occasion this was perpetuated by his home life.
Rashid had pre-booked a family room at the Premier Hotel in Goldsmith Street, Nottingham where he took his victim.
Sentenced: Rashid admitted at Nottingham Crown Court (pictured) that he had sex with a 13-year-old after she ‘tempted’ him
‘It is not too far to say that he may not have known that having sex with a 13-year-old girl was illegal.’ Judge Stokes sentenced Rashid to nine months youth custody, suspended for two years, along with a two-year probation supervision order.
Describing Rashid, the judge said: ‘He’s had an unusual education, certainly in terms of the sexual education provided. Comparing women to lollipops is a very curious way of teaching young men about sex.’
But he said that Rashid knew what he was doing was wrong.
‘It was made clear to you at the school you attended that having sexual relations with a woman before marriage was contrary to the precepts of Islam,’ he said.
Addressing Rashid, the judge said: ‘I accept this was a case where the girl was quite willing to have sexual activity with you. But the law is there to protect young girls, even though they are perfectly happy to engage in sexual activity.’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2268395/Adil-Rashid-Paedophile-claimed-Muslim-upbringing-meant-didnt-know-illegal-sex-girl-13.html#ixzz2J5r3bRX4
By Paul Bentley for the Daily Mail - Published: 19:12, 25 January 2013 | Updated: 12:03, 26 January 2013 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=&authornamef=Paul+Bentley+for+the+Daily+Mail
Ignorant: Adil Rashid (pictured) did not know it was illegal to have sex with a 13-year-old girl
A muslim who raped a 13-year-old girl he groomed on Facebook has been spared a prison sentence after a judge heard he went to an Islamic faith school where he was taught that women are worthless.
Adil Rashid, 18, claimed he was not aware that it was illegal for him to have sex with the girl because his education left him ignorant of British law.
Yesterday Judge Michael Stokes handed Rashid a suspended sentence, saying: ‘Although chronologically 18, it is quite clear from the reports that you are very naive and immature when it comes to sexual matters.’
Earlier Nottingham Crown Court heard that such crimes usually result in a four to seven-year prison sentence.
But the judge said that because Rashid was ‘passive’ and ‘lacking assertiveness’, sending him to jail might cause him ‘more damage than good’.
Rashid, from Birmingham, admitted he had sex with the girl, saying he had been ‘tempted by her’ after they met online.
They initially exchanged messages on Facebook before sending texts and chatting on the phone over a two-month period.
They then met up in Nottingham, where Rashid had booked a room at a Premier Inn.
The girl told police they stayed at the hotel for two hours and had sex after Rashid went to the bathroom and emerged wearing a condom.
Rashid then returned home and went straight to a mosque to pray. He was arrested the following week after the girl confessed what had happened to a school friend, who informed one of her teachers.
He told police he knew the girl was 13 but said he was initially reluctant to have sex before relenting after being seduced.
Earlier the court heard how Rashid had ‘little experience of women’ due to his education at an Islamic school in the UK, which cannot be named for legal reasons.
After his arrest, he told a psychologist that he did not know having sex with a 13-year-old was against the law. The court heard he found it was illegal only when he was informed by a family member.
In other interviews with psychologists, Rashid claimed he had been taught in his school that ‘women are no more worthy than a lollipop that has been dropped on the ground’.
When Judge Stokes said Rashid ‘must have known it was illegal, unless he was going round with his eyes shut’, defence lawyer Laban Leake said reports suggested Rashid had a ‘degree of sexual naivety’.
‘The school he attended, it is not going too far to say, can be described as a closed community and on this occasion this was perpetuated by his home life.
Rashid had pre-booked a family room at the Premier Hotel in Goldsmith Street, Nottingham where he took his victim.
Sentenced: Rashid admitted at Nottingham Crown Court (pictured) that he had sex with a 13-year-old after she ‘tempted’ him
‘It is not too far to say that he may not have known that having sex with a 13-year-old girl was illegal.’ Judge Stokes sentenced Rashid to nine months youth custody, suspended for two years, along with a two-year probation supervision order.
Describing Rashid, the judge said: ‘He’s had an unusual education, certainly in terms of the sexual education provided. Comparing women to lollipops is a very curious way of teaching young men about sex.’
But he said that Rashid knew what he was doing was wrong.
‘It was made clear to you at the school you attended that having sexual relations with a woman before marriage was contrary to the precepts of Islam,’ he said.
Addressing Rashid, the judge said: ‘I accept this was a case where the girl was quite willing to have sexual activity with you. But the law is there to protect young girls, even though they are perfectly happy to engage in sexual activity.’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2268395/Adil-Rashid-Paedophile-claimed-Muslim-upbringing-meant-didnt-know-illegal-sex-girl-13.html#ixzz2J5r3bRX4
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Muslim who raped girl, 13, not jailed because his “religion doesn’t teach that sex with a child is wrong” (PICTURED)
By Paul Bentley for the Daily Mail - Published: 19:12, 25 January 2013 | Updated: 12:03, 26 January 2013
Ignorant: Adil Rashid (pictured) did not know it was illegal to have sex with a 13-year-old girl
A muslim who raped a 13-year-old girl he groomed on Facebook has been spared a prison sentence after a judge heard he went to an Islamic faith school where he was taught that women are worthless.
Adil Rashid, 18, claimed he was not aware that it was illegal for him to have sex with the girl because his education left him ignorant of British law.
Yesterday Judge Michael Stokes handed Rashid a suspended sentence, saying: ‘Although chronologically 18, it is quite clear from the reports that you are very naive and immature when it comes to sexual matters.’
Earlier Nottingham Crown Court heard that such crimes usually result in a four to seven-year prison sentence.
But the judge said that because Rashid was ‘passive’ and ‘lacking assertiveness’, sending him to jail might cause him ‘more damage than good’.
Rashid, from Birmingham, admitted he had sex with the girl, saying he had been ‘tempted by her’ after they met online.
They initially exchanged messages on Facebook before sending texts and chatting on the phone over a two-month period.
They then met up in Nottingham, where Rashid had booked a room at a Premier Inn.
The girl told police they stayed at the hotel for two hours and had sex after Rashid went to the bathroom and emerged wearing a condom.
Rashid then returned home and went straight to a mosque to pray. He was arrested the following week after the girl confessed what had happened to a school friend, who informed one of her teachers.
He told police he knew the girl was 13 but said he was initially reluctant to have sex before relenting after being seduced.
Earlier the court heard how Rashid had ‘little experience of women’ due to his education at an Islamic school in the UK, which cannot be named for legal reasons.
After his arrest, he told a psychologist that he did not know having sex with a 13-year-old was against the law. The court heard he found it was illegal only when he was informed by a family member.
In other interviews with psychologists, Rashid claimed he had been taught in his school that ‘women are no more worthy than a lollipop that has been dropped on the ground’.
When Judge Stokes said Rashid ‘must have known it was illegal, unless he was going round with his eyes shut’, defence lawyer Laban Leake said reports suggested Rashid had a ‘degree of sexual naivety’.
‘The school he attended, it is not going too far to say, can be described as a closed community and on this occasion this was perpetuated by his home life.
Rashid had pre-booked a family room at the Premier Hotel in Goldsmith Street, Nottingham where he took his victim.
Sentenced: Rashid admitted at Nottingham Crown Court (pictured) that he had sex with a 13-year-old after she ‘tempted’ him
‘It is not too far to say that he may not have known that having sex with a 13-year-old girl was illegal.’ Judge Stokes sentenced Rashid to nine months youth custody, suspended for two years, along with a two-year probation supervision order.
Describing Rashid, the judge said: ‘He’s had an unusual education, certainly in terms of the sexual education provided. Comparing women to lollipops is a very curious way of teaching young men about sex.’
But he said that Rashid knew what he was doing was wrong.
‘It was made clear to you at the school you attended that having sexual relations with a woman before marriage was contrary to the precepts of Islam,’ he said.
Addressing Rashid, the judge said: ‘I accept this was a case where the girl was quite willing to have sexual activity with you. But the law is there to protect young girls, even though they are perfectly happy to engage in sexual activity.’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2268395/Adil-Rashid-Paedophile-claimed-Muslim-upbringing-meant-didnt-know-illegal-sex-girl-13.html#ixzz2J5r3bRX4
i'm not sure what the laws are like in england, but here in the states an 18 year old having sex with a 13 year old wouldn't be sent to prison for statutory rape either.
http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/nebraska-statutory-rape-laws.htm
Do some research on MENS REA and actus reus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea.
Then you will see why he wasn't charged with a crime.
skunkd0c
Well-Known Member
if the authorities were able to link them to some anti christian terrorist group its likely they would of gone to jail for attacking a church
anytime they can call folk a terrorist for whatever reason they will do, sign of the times here now, more of a (police state than a Muslim one)
although this did happen in Scotland
they most likely got screwed over with jail time because they admitted to being part of a nationalist group
also the police found messages on thier phones, "they had planned the event" so it was a little more devious than a kids joke
"In her evidence, Lambie, who had admitted during a police interview to being a member of the Scottish Defense League,"
people this stupid should possibly go to jail anyway, if you want to throw bacon at Muslims don't get caught
delete your text messages planning the event, and don't tell the police you are a member of the Scottish defense league !
So neither was found guilty of a crime, only a misdemeanor.Sharia UK: Couple gets year in jail for putting bacon on mosque door handle.
June 29, 2014 3:04 pm By Robert Spencer
If they had desecrated a church, would they be serving a year in jail? Not in Sharia Britannia. As Pamela Geller says, “while what these kids did was silly, jail time? For a bad joke?” Yes. British officials vie to outdo each other in bowing down to their new overlords.
And while what these kids did was silly, jail time? For a bad joke? – See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/06/uk-18-year-old-girl-jailed-year-putting-slice-bacon-door-handle-mosque.html/#sthash.LZaqAzUn.dpuf
“Pair jailed for Edinburgh’s Central Mosque bacon attack,” BBC, June 20, 2014 (thanks to Pamela Geller):
A teenage girl and 39-year old man who desecrated an Edinburgh mosque by attacking it with strips of bacon have both been jailed.
Chelsea Lambie, 18, from Paisley, was sentenced to 12 months and Douglas Cruikshank, from Galashiels, to nine months.
They attached bacon to door handles and threw strips inside Edinburgh’s Central Mosque on 31 January 2013.
Cruikshank pled guilty. Lambie was found guilty after denying the charges.
Sheriff Alistair Noble, at Edinburgh Sheriff Court, said: “It does not seem to me there is any way to deal with this case other than by custody.”
Have?
skunkd0c
Well-Known Member
Doer
Well-Known Member
Fugergson is not the moral equivalent to global sunni jihad. And I am not talking about the cops. And I am not talking about turf and organized drug crime. Those are not moral equivalence. If Sharia succeed in moving into Watt there would be hangings in the Street. Sharia is Law. And I am sure, we are being influenced to allow Sharia concepts singled out for a protected class.
Here a Circuit Judge actual mentioned Islamic Law as a mitigation to US law. Slipery slopes are real in our system. And all the coo-coos just say, oh relax it can't be happening here. IIf you seek you shall find the REAL.
http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2014/may/08/blog-posting/florida-democrats-just-voted-impose-sharia-law-wom/
At root of the Florida issue is a dispute between a Tampa Islamic center and some of its ousted trustees. In making a ruling on the case in March 2011, a circuit court judge cited Islamic law, sparking outcry from conservatives. That month, two Republican state lawmakers, Sen. Alan Hays and Rep. Larry Metz, announced they would push for a bill to ban foreign law in Florida courts.