Infidel no-go zones?

Doer

Well-Known Member
Need I mention the Hebrew's treatment of the Canaanites? Their modern day counterparts' treatment of the Palestinians? Christianity's multiple "Crusades"? Hell, some of modern Christians' treatment of anyone who doesn't belong to one of their churches here in the US. Islam, is far and away not the only religious organization that has oppressed or persecuted others. I doubt they will be the last and they certainly have some catching up to do with regard toward Christianity. Since Constantine the Great and Licinius legalized Christianity in the Roman Empire, Christians have waged war on anyone and everyone who disagreed with them, countless deaths are upon their hands and it's all due to zealotry.
What does history have to do with this except it proves the current threat? I am not Christian.
Muslims have killed far more than you even realize. They moved into Asia and doubled the Christ-sponsored Death toll in Europe and the Levant.
 

Saulamus

Active Member
You just said that if it is not tolerate it is not primary.
True Islam is as tolerant as any. It's the extremists that claim it isn't, much the same as the KKK does with Christianity.

Sorry, I sometimes I type sentences in my head, that don't make it to my fingers. My history statement is in reference to my personal belief that organized religions generally suck. That's the short version anyway.
 

Wilksey

Well-Known Member
True Islam is as tolerant as any. It's the extremists that claim it isn't, much the same as the KKK does with Christianity.

Sorry, I sometimes I type sentences in my head, that don't make it to my fingers. My history statement is in reference to my personal belief that organized religions generally suck. That's the short version anyway.

"True" Islam says that non-muslims have 3 choices: 1) Convert to Islam 2) Pay a tax to Islam 3) Die.

Sounds real tolerant to me....in a Stalin / Hitler / RIU politics forum kind of way.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
OK, now I will explain the other side of the argument, since the Buck types don't seem articulate enough.

You cannot fight a Religion. If you do the Faithful will be warned to hate you from birth. And they do. So, what does our animal instinct say? "Want to fight, here I am. No hiding." And when we see this "hiding" our animal instinct says of those that shirk the fight, "these are cowards, appeasers, apologists," etc. And we know this is also a base animal instinct to avoid conflict, and is very healthy, as a matter of fact. Fight vs Flight. The animal urge of Adrenalin is safety.

We are not just animals. We are subtle, dangerous, scheming, shinny monkeys on top of that. So, the counter strategy is to ignore the jihad aspect of the deadly, ancient Cult of Islam, and strip the enemy of emotional power, over generations. Laugh at them, and then forgive them in cartoon. Treat them to long vacations on the beach in Cuba.

Treat Jihad as a silly joke and only a broken view of violence that is no longer credited. So, I get it. And I agree with it. But, it is a ruse in a delicate war that is bound to proceed into the foreseeable future. It is just that the best way is to ignore the war, so we win by plowing under radical thought within the Religion of Peace. Shhhhhh......
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Let's do the math. Muslims, congregate in Enclaves as choice, unlike our sprawling lower class in Watts, etc. We put them there, out of neglect and social plowing under. Muslim are not downtrodden lower class, here, they choose to be apart. We can see some weird distributions here.



There is not a single State without a Muslim filling County, and all around are Counties with "none Reported." Even Alaska and Hawaii have this. And we see around Virginia and Washington DC, populations up to 10%. We know an entire City is well on its way to be Majority, already 45%.

Now why is this bad? IT ISN"T. I didn't say it was BAD. I am just pointing out to the pointy heads what is going here and in the world. Muslims keep apart and smile because they can gain the upper hand as they have throughout history, with Internal Jihad.

And if the moderates get the upper hand, the radicals soon take over. We see this time and again. If we quietly go about disarming the 2nd Amendment, and adopting hate speech laws, as is being attempted here everyday, we end up like England and France. The Conquest has come to roost in our streets.

We see, the Moderates could not contain the Iranian Revolution or the Arab Spring. The Army had to take back Egypt. We are letting a Radical Country form in Iraq. The cattle moo and don't see this war. That is something Jihad uses against us.
so it's not a bad thing, you say, buut they are gonna take our guns away and then conquest us.

yep, makes doer sense.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
"True" Islam says that non-muslims have 3 choices: 1) Convert to Islam 2) Pay a tax to Islam 3) Die.

Sounds real tolerant to me....in a Stalin / Hitler / RIU politics forum kind of way.
and why should we believe an admitted white supremacist like you?

white supremacists don't make for reliable sources of info.
 
Top