Doer
Well-Known Member
I am fine
Finally
Egypt Attacks Libya
- Thread starter Doer
- Start date
Finally
Doer
Well-Known Member
Interestingly the Crusades were the same social problem
Crusades could use a theme park.
The Crusades were the excuse to get rid of troublemakers, the same as Jihad.
Rrog
Well-Known Member
Both of these events are / were inexcusable. You trivialize both
cc2012
Well-Known Member
Well I thought You seemed fine all along tbh, Think The Doer Trolls would "Like" to think they are getting to You methinks ...with all this "Is Doer Losing it" ffs!! @ Doer...You've got a Point and speak the Truth...which some people don't like to hear basically they are living in a bubble...
atb
By-the-Bye; I don't Ignore anyone...But I think they Ignore Me...which is All Good!!
Doer
Well-Known Member
Yeah there is a rule that you cannot have threads to talk about people
But if Rollie saw such a thread about me he would have closed it?
Nope he went in to sling it against me also
So Animal Farm is what RIU imitates and allows
There is nothing wrong with me I take the proper drugs to make sure of that
What is their problem?
But if Rollie saw such a thread about me he would have closed it?
Nope he went in to sling it against me also
So Animal Farm is what RIU imitates and allows
There is nothing wrong with me I take the proper drugs to make sure of that
What is their problem?
Last edited:
Doer
Well-Known Member
Nothing trival joker
You said Theme Park
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you can't have threads attacking people is the rule.
i wasn't attacking you, only asking everyone if they thought you were jihading us.
what could be better?
too bad, he's allowed to post what is in the NEWS AND POLITICS..incidentally, the name of this forum.
you can hit ignore, too, if you don't like it.
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
I just came.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
let me know when they start pulling jews out of their homes in denver.
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
![5f02cdb03554284d1b3535f34390f05015f859b1e51288bd7b4508cdbfea12ae[1].jpg](/data/attachments/2452/2452003-7bf5088b7e830fd363a201a913021385.jpg)
Doer
Well-Known Member
I have been wondering what these orange jump suits mean.
And actually it is the color saffron. And since it is the most red you can easily get it counts as red. And actually saffron is the color mentioned in hadeeth, that men may not wear.
http://islamqa.info/en/2843
It was reported that wearing pure red is forbidden for men, but not for women, because of the hadeeth of Ibn ‘Umar: “The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) forbade mafdam” (reported by Imaam Ahmad and Ibn Maajah, 3591). Mafdam is something that is filled with red safflower dye. According to the commentary of al-Sindi on Sunan al-Nisaa’i, mafdam is something that is filled with red. It was reported that if ‘Umar saw a man wearing a garment dyed red with safflower, he would pull him aside and say, “Leave this for the women.” (Reported by al-Tabari).
‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Amr said: “A man who was wearing two red garments passed by the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and greeted him with salaam, but the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) did not respond.” (Reported by Abu Dawood and al-Tirmidhi, and classed as hasan by al-Bazzaar, who said: we know it only through this isnaad, which includes Abu Yahya al-Qattaat, who is a disputed figure).
There were several suggestions as to why men are forbidden to wear red, including the following:
because it is the dress of the kuffaar
because it is the adornment of women, so forbidding it is a way of discouraging the imitation of women
because it is vanity and does not befit a decent man to wear it
The prohibition applies only to garments that are dyed completely red. Garments that contain another colour such as white, black, etc. are not forbidden.
And actually it is the color saffron. And since it is the most red you can easily get it counts as red. And actually saffron is the color mentioned in hadeeth, that men may not wear.
http://islamqa.info/en/2843
It was reported that wearing pure red is forbidden for men, but not for women, because of the hadeeth of Ibn ‘Umar: “The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) forbade mafdam” (reported by Imaam Ahmad and Ibn Maajah, 3591). Mafdam is something that is filled with red safflower dye. According to the commentary of al-Sindi on Sunan al-Nisaa’i, mafdam is something that is filled with red. It was reported that if ‘Umar saw a man wearing a garment dyed red with safflower, he would pull him aside and say, “Leave this for the women.” (Reported by al-Tabari).
‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Amr said: “A man who was wearing two red garments passed by the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and greeted him with salaam, but the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) did not respond.” (Reported by Abu Dawood and al-Tirmidhi, and classed as hasan by al-Bazzaar, who said: we know it only through this isnaad, which includes Abu Yahya al-Qattaat, who is a disputed figure).
There were several suggestions as to why men are forbidden to wear red, including the following:
because it is the dress of the kuffaar
because it is the adornment of women, so forbidding it is a way of discouraging the imitation of women
because it is vanity and does not befit a decent man to wear it
The prohibition applies only to garments that are dyed completely red. Garments that contain another colour such as white, black, etc. are not forbidden.