SupraSPL
Well-Known Member
I took the pulsed measurements with the lenses off. Waited a few minutes then took pulsed measurements with lenses on. Then I let it run (several hours) with lenses off to make sure the lux and power meter readings had stabilized. Then I added the lenses and waited about 60 minutes to make sure the readings had stabilized. The lux meter was never moved for any of those readings. Those are the four data sets I used to determine the temp droop both with lenses off and lenses on 2% and 2.1% respectively.How long did you measure the droop for? Hrs?
That's the problem, no one in this forum has run cree/blux top bin cobs with secondary lenses on for months or years.........that I'm aware of?
We already know what happens to the Chinese panels with them on== high failure rates, even melted smds/cobs.
I Guess guinea pigs are in order!....lol
Those temp droop results are consistent with the readings I got from Vero29 mounted on CPU cooler, no lenses, driven at 2.45A, fan running at 5V (.4W) Very impressive thermal performance from the Veros in both cases. Under the same condition, the Cree CXA3070 was ~4.5%. I have not tried the CXA3590 that would be very interesting.