Feds: Banks Should Call Police if Customer Withdraws More Than $5k in Cash

[Rob Roy]

perhaps if you were "well read", you'd have brushed up on the supreme court cases on DUI checkpoints and realized that there is broad consensus on legal ones versus illegal ones.

Perhaps if you took your head out of your ass, you'd realize the Supreme Courts reinterpretations of common sense into legal excuses are part of the problem.

then why did you choose to send your kids there, dumbass?

LOL

My kids are not children. It was a long time ago and I didn't have all of the realizations I have now, then. I was still mentally chained, as you are.

It's sort of like when you were 17 you thought shitting on other peoples property was a good idea , now you probably have had a change of heart...no wait, you haven't.



If public schools are so good why must they place an automatic ransom on your house to fund them? I bet you can't answer that one.

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm losing more and more respect for you by the day.

i don't think anyone here wants your respect, so that is no doubt a good thing.

if i knew you respected anyone, i would automatically respect them less based on what a piece of shit you are.

 

[schuylaar]

you left out the part where you espouse white supremacist views, support a candidate who wants to fight against gay marriage, keep cannabis illegal, make abortion a crime, you deny the facts about global warming, have provided zero evidence that you grow or smoke, and never made a peep about george w bush when he was in office (as evidence by your pocketfixes account).

so besides the fact that you are 100% lying, you are totally right.

really @ginwilly ..bucky's right.

 

[see4]

Remember during our most recent conversation how you avoided answering my questions? I do too.

When you can go back and answer them, I might consider destroying your latest claims.

I haven't even read them yet and probably won't bother. Have a nice day.

I guess we are at a stale mate, you seem to think I'm not answering your questions, and you flat out ignore mine.

Good talk. Let's do it again sometime... Your ego is clouding your judgement.

 

[see4]

Perhaps if you took your head out of your ass, you'd realize the Supreme Courts reinterpretations of common sense into legal excuses are part of the problem.




My kids are not children. It was a long time ago and I didn't have all of the realizations I have now, then. I was still mentally chained, as you are.

It's sort of like when you were 17 you thought shitting on other peoples property was a good idea , now you probably have had a change of heart...no wait, you haven't.



If public schools are so good why must they place an automatic ransom on your house to fund them? I bet you can't answer that one.

Oh, so now you've seen the divine light? Jesus you are a piece of work.

 

[UncleBuck]

Perhaps if you took your head out of your ass, you'd realize the Supreme Courts reinterpretations of common sense into legal excuses are part of the problem.

common sense: setting up a DUI checkpoint in a part of town with lots of bars during times when people are drinking heavily.

verdict: 100% constitutional

not common sense: setting up a DUI checkpoint on monday morning on a busy highway.

verdict: not constitutional

If public schools are so good why must they place an automatic ransom on your house to fund them?

if what you describe even remotely resembles reality whatsoever, then why do people voluntarily choose to live in areas with higher property taxes and even vote for tax increases upon themselves?

THE FREE MARKET HAS SPOKEN.

 

[UncleBuck]

Oh, so now you've seen the divine light? Jesus you are a piece of work.

these people are fucking mentally ill.

 

[see4]

If this is actually how you feel, I think differently of you ginwilly.

you left out the part where you espouse white supremacist views, support a candidate who wants to fight against gay marriage, keep cannabis illegal, make abortion a crime, you deny the facts about global warming, have provided zero evidence that you grow or smoke, and never made a peep about george w bush when he was in office (as evidence by your pocketfixes account).

so besides the fact that you are 100% lying, you are totally right.

damn, i spoke too soon. i almost forgot about those accurate descriptions of you.

 

[schuylaar]

Let's isolate this idea right here for a moment.

For the basis of this argument, let's say I agree with you that consumption tax is more favorable than income tax.

Are we to pay for the same expenditures the government has now? Defense, health, education, etc. With that consumption tax?

And let's say consumption tax is implemented, what is to stop you [and the like] from crying that consumption tax is coercive?

Before you respond, I'd like to make an assumption that it's not how we are being taxed, but rather the tax itself, is what bothers you.

one thing is for sure..if we had a consumption tax, ruling class will be paying what they should, instead of getting special treatment from the government because they have money.

no negotiation possible. it is what it is..just like tax on gas, liquor and cigs..which by the way (once again) targets the have-nots.

 

[see4]

these people are fucking mentally ill.

It really saddens me that people like this exist. The disillusion I have for these Klansmen is astounding.

 

[UncleBuck]

damn, i spoke too soon. i almost forgot about those accurate descriptions of you.

he's totally for abortion, which is why he votes for rawn pawl, who wants to outlaw abortion.

he is totally a pothead (based on his own completely unreliable word and zero evidence whatsoever) and wants to legalize, which is why he will vote for rend pawl, who wants to keep it illegal.

he is totally for gay marriage, which is why he will vote for rend pawl, who wants to "win back the hearts and minds" of people to bigotry.

he is totally for the environment, which is why he is against the EPA and spouts global warming denier talking points endlessly (while saying he believes in AGW).

he really is a two faced fuck.

 

[Rob Roy]

Oh, so now you've seen the divine light? Jesus you are a piece of work.

You still can't answer questions. I've seen the light bulb over your head. Dim, very dim.

 

[schuylaar]

Perhaps if you took your head out of your ass, you'd realize the Supreme Courts reinterpretations of common sense into legal excuses are part of the problem.




My kids are not children. It was a long time ago and I didn't have all of the realizations I have now, then. I was still mentally chained, as you are.

It's sort of like when you were 17 you thought shitting on other peoples property was a good idea , now you probably have had a change of heart...no wait, you haven't.



If public schools are so good why must they place an automatic ransom on your house to fund them? I bet you can't answer that one.

you know i seem to recall a time when unless you had school age children you didn't have to pay for the school board..NJ definitely.

 

[UncleBuck]

one thing is for sure..if we had a consumption tax, ruling class will be paying what they should, instead of getting special treatment from the government because they have money.

no negotiation possible. it is what it is..just like tax on gas, liquor and cigs..which by the way (once again) targets the have-nots.

a consumption tax is beyond retarded.

the poor, who spend almost 100% of what they make, would be taxed on almost 100% of their earnings.

the rich, who do not spend anywhere close to 100% of what they make, might face taxes on about 5-10% of their earnings, if that.

it is a retarded regressive folly.

 

[see4]

one thing is for sure..if we had a consumption tax, ruling class will be paying what they should, instead of getting special treatment from the government because they have money.

no negotiation possible. it is what it is..just like tax on gas, liquor and cigs..which by the way (once again) targets the have-nots.

As long as it is progressive. Maybe. And that is a very slight maybe.

But beyond that point. Are we to still pay for all the government programs we have today?

 

[see4]

You still can't answer questions. I've seen the light bulb over your head. Dim, very dim.

You don't know how to read. And that's ok. Just don't blame me, slave klansmen.

 

[schuylaar]

common sense: setting up a DUI checkpoint in a part of town with lots of bars during times when people are drinking heavily.

verdict: 100% constitutional

not common sense: setting up a DUI checkpoint on monday morning on a busy highway.

verdict: not constitutional

you are an idiot.




if what you describe even remotely resembles reality whatsoever, then why do people voluntarily choose to live in areas with higher property taxes and even vote for tax increases upon themselves?

THE FREE MARKET HAS SPOKEN.

some people have disposable income.

 

[see4]

You still can't answer questions. I've seen the light bulb over your head. Dim, very dim.

Oh kiddo, your penis is so very very tiny.

No, these are your words



Give me specifics. To who are you referring? And to whom are they controlling? Be specific.



We have all granted exception for government to use force, as you describe it. Just as they are accountable and held liable (which seems less so these days) for the promises they intended to fulfill when "forcefully" taking our taxes.

I agree, that if I were to go to my neighbor and demand that he give me $100 so that I could use some of that money to sweep his sidewalk and look out for bad guys, that would be nothing more than extortion. And in that sense, I suppose HOA is not much more than extortion, nor the state government "demanding" tax dollars. And all that is no different than a business owner denying someone the right to use their facility or purchase their products, which from what I understand you are ok with.



Now are you referring to business owners who deny people access based on skin color or sexual preference, or are you referring to government?



Cognitive dissonance is certainly not a facilitator to ignorance. Ignorance by definition is, "lack of knowledge or information". Cognitive dissonance is the discomfort in holding two or more contradictory beliefs or is confronted with new information that conflicts with existing beliefs. Because I choose not to be persuaded by your false equivalent arguments does not mean that I am either ignorant or experiencing cognitive dissonance, it just means you have not done a good enough job in your persuasion. Something you misunderstand about me, is that I can be pretty open minded, as most intelligent people are, as long as they can be persuaded.

Remember, you are the one making the claims, you need to persuade me. I have the advantage of continuing as I have with no worse the wear.

Let's isolate this idea right here for a moment.

For the basis of this argument, let's say I agree with you that consumption tax is more favorable than income tax.

Are we to pay for the same expenditures the government has now? Defense, health, education, etc. With that consumption tax?

And let's say consumption tax is implemented, what is to stop you [and the like] from crying that consumption tax is coercive?

Before you respond, I'd like to make an assumption that it's not how we are being taxed, but rather the tax itself, is what bothers you.

 

[UncleBuck]

some people have disposable income.

then why don't they spend it on private tutors for their kids instead?

THE FREE MARKET HAS SPOKEN.

 

[Rob Roy]

you know i seem to recall a time when unless you had school age children you didn't have to pay for the school board..NJ definitely.

Being forced to pay for anything you don't want and don't use doesn't seem very nice to me.

In fact it's alot like shitting on a floor and expecting somebody else to clean it up.

If children are taught bullying is wrong, isn't it odd that the method of funding public schools relies on bullying?