theexpress
Well-Known Member
1000 watt hps lights ftw...........it is a lot of LED talk,in this LEC thread....just saying
It is starting to get a lil strange.
1000 watt hps lights ftw...........it is a lot of LED talk,in this LEC thread....just saying
It is starting to get a lil strange.
@rollitup knew what he was doing..lol
I like all the information,and the side talk....I was just saying,it's funny.
Other lighting...LED and other lighting...I'm pretty sure this thread is in the led forum, lec's are hids unless I've been severely mislead
......it is a lot of LED talk,in this LEC thread....just saying It is starting to get a lil strange.
I got 2 1000 DE ready to go up(flower room),sun system AC/DE hoods..1000 watt hps lights ftw.....
No.......it says "other lighting" than LEDFirst post says, CMH > LED. Seems like a topic well worth discussing.
Apologies but I have no experience/insight in a vert setup like that, but I'd expect fantastic results considering I'm running just soil in pots and got over 1 gpw with mixed strains. In a numbers run like I'm running with those 4x Blue Dreams if I can reach 1.2 - 1.4 gpw, a vert setup should pull significantly higher. The only one I know in here running these mogul bulbs in a vert bare-bulb is @a senile fungus. I think you'd be fine in covering the vertical part with 4x bulbs, just not sure how the 2.7' radius would be for coverage/penetration. I've found the best output for my setup has been to have the bulb 20" above the canopy, with some strains it's penetrated and provided decent size buds right down to 24" below the canopy, so 44" from the bulb.
According to Beta Test Team:
"The values are correct, they were measured by a 3rd party accredited lab using NIST certified integrating sphere (for lamp AND fixture irradiance measurements, separately) and the most current protocols.
...there's not much difference between the real-world efficiencies of Greenbeams and Gavita PRO DE, yet, Greenbeams is vastly better than Gavita in terms of irradiance uniformity over the canopy:"
Greenbeams with Philips Green Power CMH 315W
-- Greenbeams reflective material reflectivity, according to Cycloptics: 95%
-- Relative amount photons emitted by the lamp that exit the reflector after a single bounce, according to Cycloptics: 95%
-- Relative amount of photons emitted by the lamp that exit the reflector, according to Cycloptics: 92.3%
-- Relative amount of photosynthetic photons emitted by the lamp (400-700nm) that exit the reflector: 76.84%
-- Reduction in photosynthetic photons (400-700nm) exiting the reflector as compared to emitted by the lamp: 23.16%
Gavita PRO DE HPS 1000W
-- Gavita 'HortiStar' reflective material reflectivity, according to Gavita: 96%
-- Relative amount photons emitted by the lamp that exit the reflector after a single bounce: unknown
-- Relative amount of photons emitted by the lamp that exit the reflector: unknown
-- Relative amount of photosynthetic photons emitted by the lamp (400-700nm) that exit the reflector: 80.95%
-- Reduction in photosynthetic photons (400-700nm) exiting the reflector as compared to emitted by the lamp: 19%
First post says, CMH > LED. Seems like a topic well worth discussing.
All your grows are quality as Fuck. Regardless of what kind of light or how many watts it is. Can't wait to check that out.I got 2 1000 DE ready to go up(flower room),sun system AC/DE hoods..
I don't know about the first,but I wouldn't known it was running at 210 watts,if it was not for someone from the LED section.If I'm not mistaken @genuity was one of the first growers to get his hands on the cycloptics tech................ I remember we were all jealous
time flies.
I don't know about the first,but I wouldn't known it was running at 210 watts,if it was not for someone from the LED section.
From what I'm seeing and the numbers you're quoting, based on vert being a more efficient method for yields, I'd say for sure.Vert is tricky; first, I'm expecting the lights to reinforce one another's output. Second, they don't need to penetrate more than maybe a foot. Third, as mentioned; NO reflector, so no losses- but none of the concentration, either. Finally, I could always add more.
I'm pulling as much as 5 1/2# per 4 kW of tired HPS on magnetic(!) ballasts now. Would 8 of these be at least equivalent?
I don't know about the first,but I wouldn't known it was running at 210 watts,if it was not for someone from the LED section.
I don't think going over the classic led vs hps arguments is going to do this thread any good but that argument is so hard not to refute because, nothing personal, it's so typical and cliche.
The "not everyone wants it cheap and dirty" is a straw man. I didn't claim everyone or even I want it cheap and certainly not dirty. That's obviously taking it to one extreme and not an argument from me. It's also the same thing as if I would say "not everyone wants to buy the most expensive and dirty diy". Not really a great argument is it.
LED folks lists $ per par watt. Surely that is not because you want it as expensive as possible. Surely the efficiency goal is also about saving money on electricity and not just about claiming efficiency in comparisons to HID... I hope anyway
That longer ROI is also highly debatable. Above all, "context", read the initial post, read what comparison I replied to, and you will see price is relevant. A highly skewed comparison is skewed only further by boasting how efficient LEDs can be if you just forget about the cost for a sec.
If you correct the inflated price in Supra's own comparison to the factual one (and that kit is more plug and play than DIY) the outcome of his own math looks very very different. For the cost of that optic vero example you can buy roughly 2x, currently 3x with that deal, the ppf of that vero. And you can run 2 of those for many years (well ok, fail rate is higher) without becoming a worse investment.
That's quite a big difference, and no cliches from the bibled about reflector losses and IR spikes balance that out.
It sure is an easy way to troll HID threads though... There's always a more efficient led possible... If there would be a HID tomorrow that is 4x better in every way Supra will refer to the more than 100% efficient LED in a lab I posted about...
In other words, people get burned by shitty leds because of lack of research, and a closed mind. People don't want to listen to supra's reasoning because they don't want to stop and ask for directions when they're lost.
Instead, they usually buy some red+blue mono based units with leds of unknown origin (epistar), and then complain about the airy buds they get... Their conclusion? It was computers fault because my computer sucked.