UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
no, i do not share in your homophobic bigotry or complete misunderstanding of the law.You and I both know it should have never seen the SCOTUS Buck.
unlike you, i am not a dumptruck of stupidity and bigotry.
no, i do not share in your homophobic bigotry or complete misunderstanding of the law.You and I both know it should have never seen the SCOTUS Buck.
how is marriage a privilege? when my wife and i went in, we viewed it as our right.
and again, since the constitution guarantees equal protection of the law, hopefully you can figure the rest out from there.
if you tried to say gays weren't allowed to drive or fly planes, i'm sure they would.
no, i do not share in your homophobic bigotry or complete misunderstanding of the law.
unlike you, i am not a dumptruck of stupidity and bigotry.
the 14th amendment ensures equal protection of the law to all citizens, gay and straight, in all 50 states.Their is no Constitutional law in marriage, it`s a State`s issue because it varies from State to State. You just siding.
the 14th amendment ensures equal protection of the law to all citizens, gay and straight, in all 50 states.
you dumptruck of stupidity.
http://www.usmarriagelaws.com/If marriage were a law
They probably would if state trade licenses were only given to straight people, dipshit.Maybe the SCOTUS should rule on Electricians and Plumbers.....
It's not about marriage, it's about equal rights under the law. It's the gov. job to ensure equal protection to all citizens, equallyNo buck the SCOTUS can`t, it`s not theirs to do. You have the right to chose that path, but needed the license like me too. That would qualify you for Gov. perks.....Mr. Gay can`t just step in and say, I want some too cuz I am.
Aint nothing Constitutional about a marriage debate. You can lose your license to drive and be married. You can`t lose your Rights in America.
They probably would if state trade licenses were only given to straight people, dipshit.
It's not about marriage, it's about equal rights under the law. It's the gov. job to ensure equal protection to all citizens, equally
it's almost as if you know what the words mean, but you clearly don't.They can`t, it`s not their job. Why can`t you understand that. Going above State and federal courts to the SCOTUS with non law matters is breaking the Constitution. Gays want equal privileges they claim are law. Being out of the privileges is not unequal; treatment.
it's almost as if you know what the words mean, but you clearly don't.
it's kind of like watching a dog bark at itself in front of a mirror.
14th amendment;Under what law ? Yes we know the 14th, but not the law you are referencing,...so, What law ? It matters and is specific....the 14th says equal rights under the law but you don`t say the law.
and feeling so sorry for it you want to go take it out back and put it out of it's misery?it's almost as if you know what the words mean, but you clearly don't.
it's kind of like watching a dog bark at itself in front of a mirror.
14th amendment;
"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Gay people are citizens, yes? Citizens are guaranteed "equal protection of the laws". Marriage is federally recognized by law.
There is it, right there in black and white. Your argument is baseless, it seems to be "the Supreme Court deciding on gay marriage is unconstitutional because the powers not specifically outlined in the Constitution are relegated to the states", well, I just showed you the 14th amendment states it loud and clear
like a dog barking at itself in a mirror.Face it buck, there aint no US laws saying you must marry....It`s not a law.....