Wrong.
This thread is about workers earning what's rightfully theirs by discussing the shortcomings of capitalism, and income inequality
You seem very confused..
Where were you earlier in the thread when I said 25 x's more than the average worker is perfectly acceptable CEO income, 325 x's at the expense of the poor/middle class is not. Why do you believe it's OK for the CEO and top executives to steal the workers surplus labor and give it to themselves and their shareholders? Or give it to politicians by way of campaign contributions for business and tax subsidies and changes to legislation in their favor?
Where do you think the money comes from to increase CEO income by that much over the course of 40 years when in previous years it was relatively stable? You said "technology and globalization" to answer that question before without providing any evidence to support it, so, I'm still waiting on that..
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to look at the facts and objectively interpret the data, and you and a few other people are so personally invested in the narrative you've created absent those facts, that nothing will deter you in thinking otherwise. Take for example the issue of anthropogenic climate change; The overwhelming majority of the world's scientists accept it as fact, more clear than the connection of tobacco and lung cancer, and what do you and the rest of the opponents of a living wage do? Deny the science... NASA is one of the leading scientific organizations studying the causes and effects of climate change, so what do the republicans and people you support in government do as soon as they take control? Defund the programs and try to stifle progress through financial attrition...
Disgraceful.