Scotch089
Well-Known Member
ive talked with supra, im sure way too much for him, trying to wrap my head around simple shit... and one has resurfaced. I think I got it... but honestly the numbers are hard to believe. I did a general 'mean' calculation and going from the average of the 3k/6k/670 efficiency to the 5k/670 efficiency, it was 20% more efficient, even with the reds........ so I was at work and decided to... not work on work. but crunch these numbers.
my original sheet for my setup is off (assuming because of the different Voltages, the ABs were put in at 32.6, when they are really 33.6 according to supes chart, examples like that..) so I dono how close those numbers are because calculated draw ended up being 10-12w more than what actual is (124 vs 112) but I came up with:
700mA
x8 cxa 3k ABs are 52.37%, so 12.36Pw from 23.61w (total= 98.88 of 188.88w)
x8 V5 2A XP-L 5700-6k are 53.49%, so 1.126Pw of 2.051w (total=9.008 of 16.408w)
x11 XP-E FR 901s are 48.53%, so 0.771Pw from 1.589w (total=8.482 of 17.479w)
+ the 7% driver losses so I multiplied the total draw of all three colors by 1.14 (two drivers) (I take it back, two drivers takes it up to 119 calc'd watts, at least a little closer)
+ 11.5w for the x4 fans
so 114.92/274.976= 42.79% efficient at a max current of 700mA (1100 umol at 18")
I did this the exact same way for the 350mA and came out to: 58.76/136.754= 42.96%
For going half the power you would expect it to climb more, or is that just me...? but the results hold true for the new 5k/red going in its place.....
700mA
x8 cxb 3070 5k BD are 63.04%, so 14.88Pw from 23.61w (total= 119.07 of 188.88w)
x19 XP-E FR 901s are 48.53%, so 0.771Pw from 1.589w (total= 14.649 of 30.191w)
+ the 7% loss on the WHITES ONLY from an HLG-185H-C700A
+ the 11% loss on the REDS ONLY from an HLG-40H-54A
+11.5w for the fans
comes out to 131.85Pw/247.11w= 53.3% at max current of 700mA, hoping to go higher on the umols at 18" given the less phosphor
same for 350mA= 67.35/124.6= 54% efficient
excited about the slightly less draw, talking 25+ watts, but I am wondering how solid these numbers are.... please @solomontin, @SupraSPL, @Positivity, etc. Correct my mistakes. And I just copied this all off the messy paper I wrote on from work so numbers could be copied wrong
my original sheet for my setup is off (assuming because of the different Voltages, the ABs were put in at 32.6, when they are really 33.6 according to supes chart, examples like that..) so I dono how close those numbers are because calculated draw ended up being 10-12w more than what actual is (124 vs 112) but I came up with:
700mA
x8 cxa 3k ABs are 52.37%, so 12.36Pw from 23.61w (total= 98.88 of 188.88w)
x8 V5 2A XP-L 5700-6k are 53.49%, so 1.126Pw of 2.051w (total=9.008 of 16.408w)
x11 XP-E FR 901s are 48.53%, so 0.771Pw from 1.589w (total=8.482 of 17.479w)
+ the 7% driver losses so I multiplied the total draw of all three colors by 1.14 (two drivers) (I take it back, two drivers takes it up to 119 calc'd watts, at least a little closer)
+ 11.5w for the x4 fans
so 114.92/274.976= 42.79% efficient at a max current of 700mA (1100 umol at 18")
I did this the exact same way for the 350mA and came out to: 58.76/136.754= 42.96%
For going half the power you would expect it to climb more, or is that just me...? but the results hold true for the new 5k/red going in its place.....
700mA
x8 cxb 3070 5k BD are 63.04%, so 14.88Pw from 23.61w (total= 119.07 of 188.88w)
x19 XP-E FR 901s are 48.53%, so 0.771Pw from 1.589w (total= 14.649 of 30.191w)
+ the 7% loss on the WHITES ONLY from an HLG-185H-C700A
+ the 11% loss on the REDS ONLY from an HLG-40H-54A
+11.5w for the fans
comes out to 131.85Pw/247.11w= 53.3% at max current of 700mA, hoping to go higher on the umols at 18" given the less phosphor
same for 350mA= 67.35/124.6= 54% efficient
excited about the slightly less draw, talking 25+ watts, but I am wondering how solid these numbers are.... please @solomontin, @SupraSPL, @Positivity, etc. Correct my mistakes. And I just copied this all off the messy paper I wrote on from work so numbers could be copied wrong