nitro harley
Well-Known Member
Well that rules out suicide , Are you standing behind an illegal killer now?
The growing threat of right wing terrorism
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
mathematician1.618
Member
Socialism and communism destroy God and replace it with a figurehead of the state, this is how far left liberalism i.e. everyone shares everything actually decays into the far-right dictatorship, biotch.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so hitler was a liberal?
mathematician1.618
Member
He nationalized healthcare (obamcare), education (Commoncore), and took the guns away (very left-wing to campaign against guns), what the fuck do you think?
mathematician1.618
Member
Obama and Hitler are a lot alike, look at their policies.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
And sit in Congress until they retire from politics and the Democrat party.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
No. it's a city. Owned and operated by the Democrat party for like 50-60 years.isn't that a red state nitro?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
hitler expanded gun rights actually.
angela merkel also oversees nationalized healthcare and education, is she hitler as well?
what was the most liberal part about exterminating the jews in your opinion?
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Actually he didn't take away guns. That is a falsehood. He actually expanded gun ownership by rescinding laws that were in place from WW1
mathematician1.618
Member
National Socialism was very LIBERAL for the time.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
I'm surprised they were able to keep re-electing their Grand Cyclops as a Democrat Senator up until he retire due to old age.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
didn't he recant and apologize, instead of just switching to the republican party like strom thurmond or jesse helms?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_legislation_in_Germany#Gun_regulation_of_the_Third_Reich
since hitler was such a liberal, what was the most liberal thing about invading foreign nations or executing the jews?
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Buck hasn't had an erection since the last time I replied to one of his posts.
mathematician1.618
Member
In 1933, the ultimate extremist group, led by Adolf Hitler, seized power and used the records to identify, disarm, and attack political opponents and Jews. Constitutional rights were suspended, and mass searches for and seizures of guns and dissident publications ensued. Police revoked gun licenses of Social Democrats and others who were not “politically reliable.”
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/365103/how-nazis-used-gun-control-stephen-p-halbrook
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/365103/how-nazis-used-gun-control-stephen-p-halbrook
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
The Nazi gun control theory is counterfactual history, which is a form of history that attempts to answer "what if" questions known as counterfactuals.[1] According to this theory, the gun regulations enforced by the Third Reich rendered victims of the Holocaust weaker to such an extent that they could have more effectively resisted oppression if they had been armed or better armed.
This theory is prevalent and primarily used within U.S. gun politics. Questions about its validity, and about the motives behind its inception, have been raised by scholars. Proponents in the United States have used it as part of a "security against tyranny" argument, while opponents have referred to it as a form of Reductio ad Hitlerum. The theory is not supported by mainstream historical, legal, or political science scholarship, with such sources describing it as historically "dubious",[2] "questionable",[3] "tendentious",[4] and "problematic".[
mathematician1.618
Member
So Hitler did not disarm the communists or the Jews, bullshit, that is a historical fact.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
In his 2012 book, holocaust scholar Michael Bryant says Halbrook, LaPierre, Zelman, Dave Kopel, and others' "use of history has selected factual inaccuracies, and their methodology can be questioned."[4]
In January 2013, Anti-Defamation League (ADL) director Abraham Foxman said in a press release: "The idea that supporters of gun control are doing something akin to what Hitler’s Germany did to strip citizens of guns in the run-up to the Second World War is historically inaccurate and offensive, especially to Holocaust survivors and their families."[22] Later that year, Jewish groups and Jersey City, New Jersey, mayor Steven Fulop criticized the NRA for comparing gun control supporters to Nazi Germany.[23] The Jewish Federation of Greater MetroWest NJ released a statement saying: "Access to guns and the systematic murder of six million Jews have no basis for comparison in the United States or in New Jersey. The Holocaust has no place in this discussion and it is offensive to link this tragedy to such a debate."[23]
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
There was nothing socialist about "national socialism".
Fascism is a form of capitalism, hence the privatization.
Fascism is a form of capitalism, hence the privatization.
mathematician1.618
Member
This does not refute the fact that Hitler selectively disarmed segments of his opposition. This just states that gun control advocates have taken this fact and used to it argue for gun rights.