TheQuantumMechanic
Active Member
Just asking.
I am not sure what you mean. Better or worse in your instance is a manor of a misconstrued perspective. Let me ask you this. Why would you work to build up the nutrients in the soil just flush them out? Say it out loud and it will seem as foolish as the idea really is. Watering until they start to runoff is all you need to do in order to help the plant with the buildup of salts (adding molasses is another great way to do it). The plant will do what it needs to do. This isn't my approach to growing, it is nature. They take what they need. Pooling your water from below keeps the lower portion of the root system with an excess of salt from the process. Does that sound like a good idea to you? Use a water wand from the top and when it starts to runoff, stop. Your plants will thank you. That isn't to say that you won't need to water gradually. I usually give them all ten seconds from the wand and them go back to the first plant again (I have anywhere from 25-50 at any given time). Depending on how dry they are or how big the root balls are, you may need to do a few cycles of 10-20 seconds so the water is absorbed and doesn't just run off the top.We shall agree to disagree. I think its better to water from the bottom and flush when need be, you don't. Really its just like the rest of growing, everyone has their preferences and what works for one doesn't work for everyone.
I did a side by side test with 16 plants. I have a pretty good idea as to what I am talking about and I am not just talking out my ass. 8 had litter box trays they were watered from, the other 8 got the wand. Needless to say, there was no comparison. The plants that got a chance to relieve themselves of the salts they didn't need did better than the plants that were forced to suck them back up. Don't take my word for it, try it out for yourself. Or, take my word for it.Bottom watering is great for when you let the soil get too dry but it does not provide the same level of air exchange as a top down gravitational water feed. I don't know if the difference is material to results. I see wick system tomato growers banging em out so I tend to think it is not a material difference. It would be a fun experiment to try and I bet someone here already has.
I'll take your word for it. I don't have one way of watering and I use a few different methods depending on what I'm trying to do at any particular time.I did a side by side test with 16 plants. I have a pretty good idea as to what I am talking about and I am not just talking out my ass. 8 had litter box trays they were watered from, the other 8 got the wand. Needless to say, there was no comparison. The plants that got a chance to relieve themselves of the salts they didn't need did better than the plants that were forced to suck them back up. Don't take my word for it, try it out for yourself. Or, take my word for it.
Get yourself a 35 gallon container for water, a submersible pump, and a water wand and be done with it. It isn't in this picture, but I also have an aquarium air stone in there running at all times with four ports so I can add a stone to my feeding bucket while I am making up the mixture. Also, I put the pump right in the feed bucket (about 10 gallons of water per feeding) with the wand open and on full to mix it with the airstone pumping too. All of these little things that I do for them add up to a large reward. I have been doing this a long time and have done experiments with every grow. I fuck with some of them, I pamper others. It is easy to solve problems with your plants when you are doing it deliberately. When you encounter them, not so much. If you are prepared for the solution when issues arise through you own prior controlled experimentation, then you will be well equipped to tackle anything. This is why I usually only respond in the beginner area. I have done the experiments and like to help people. The 20 years I have been growing doesn't hurt either.I'll take your word for it. I don't have one way of watering and I use a few different methods depending on what I'm trying to do at any particular time.
Not terrible, could be better. That is all I said. They would be bigger if you watered from the top. By 20-30% bigger. Isn't that enough to consider that you could be doing them more justice? Think about it. Tuck your ego away and realize there is a better way.Watering from the bottom is not detrimental to the roots, that's ridiculous. If someone was achieving poor results in a "side-by-side", it's because they weren't doing it right.
Here are some of the terrible results one should prepare for when watering from the bottom:
View attachment 3468450
View attachment 3468451