captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
I'd like to see what 16 of them would do in a 5x5.
855watts vero29?that's a pretty good price!Thanks guys, makes more sense now. I think 9 units spread out in 3 rows of 3 would be killer.
855W in a 5 X 5 tent = 34W m2 which is pretty decent and for a lovely price of only $1566! Ouch..
Leaf matter in bud can be greatly reduced with proper nutes at the proper times, I can't argue with HPS performance, especially hung vertically. The cobs have been the best supplemental lighting option for me so far in flower..My information comes from growing with various types of lights and I prefer a light which has more red in it. That's why I liked the red white spectrums and also like using a HPS to grow seems like if you can get a decent stretch during flower you can really improve yield. Heck I know people that veg with HPS to increase stretch. The more blue the more leaf you have to trim. 4000k might be a great light for veg, but I have a better one its called a Metal Halide. They needed to have a flowering only light and a veg light if they want to put that much blue in their lights. Offer a 2700k or 3000k spectrum for people who hate trimming and want big huge buds with minimal leaf and can provide their own veg light or just veg with that and let it stretch.
Vero 29 spectrum analysis, 3 different spectrums
SOURCE: www.opticgrowlights.com
View attachment 3467604
I definitely don't think the new units are out of line on price with the components that are in them.Thanks guys, makes more sense now. I think 9 units spread out in 3 rows of 3 would be killer.
855W in a 5 X 5 tent = 34W m2 which is pretty decent and for a lovely price of only $1566! Ouch..
For sure I definitely think its pretty decent value especially for so many units. It works out to like $1.60pw. I also like the modular approach. I didn't see the discount price if you buy more units. $1375 is a really good price IMO, similar in price for what you would have to pay if you went DIY.I definitely don't think the new units are out of line on price with the components that are in them.
Look at this pure china special generic cob'ish fixture:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Fastest-Growth-Switch-90-Reflector-Cup-100W-LED-Light-Grow-Panel-COB-Flower-Lamp-/201007083354?hash=item2eccf4af5a
Also, if you look at the drop down menu for 9 units on the A51 site it is $1375 for 9
That's just $30ea more than the china special and you get a real high grade cob and I believe free shipping too - sounds like pretty good buy to me
I definitely don't think the new units are out of line on price with the components that are in them.
Look at this pure china special generic cob'ish fixture:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Fastest-Growth-Switch-90-Reflector-Cup-100W-LED-Light-Grow-Panel-COB-Flower-Lamp-/201007083354?hash=item2eccf4af5a
Also, if you look at the drop down menu for 9 units on the A51 site it is $1375 for 9
That's just $30ea more than the china special and you get a real high grade cob and I believe free shipping too - sounds like pretty good buy to me
This is the line-up:
3000k Vero 29 v2 @ 80w
4000k Vero 29 v2 @ 80w
5000k Vero 29 v2 @ 80w
CXB 3590 @ 25w
CXB 3590 @ 50w
XPG2 5000k S4, XPE2 red P4 @ 70w (this will also be the upgrade kit's LEDs)
Each of those fixtures can be connected into larger fixtures in either a square shape or a longer shape, depending on the grower's needs. You can even mix the different versions in one big frankenpanel if you chose to do so.
I'd say your math is a little off. Each unit dissipates ~80W, with the other ~15 due to the fan and driver efficacy.That Ebay Chinese one says the actual power is 58w +/- 3%. And uses "Really Epileds High Power 3w LED".
$122.36 divided by 58w = $2.10 per 1w.
The W90 even at one unit at $174 and 95w actual watts that's $1.83 per 1w.
I'm still too broke for even the Chinese one. I'm making my own right now. Cost me $100 in parts.
I'd say your math is a little off. Each unit dissipates ~80W, with the other ~15 due to the fan and driver efficacy.
At 80W and at 174$, I get 2.175$ per watt. In the best case scenario, when one buys x12 units at once, each unit is sold at ~146$ (without considering shipping costs). This comes out to 1.825$ per watt. It's a cheap price to pay for decent lighting but is not the cheapest dollar per watt cost in the Vero-COB fixture market today.
I point this out for multiple reasons, Giga, most importantly because as the COB market begins to take off, we, as growers and fans of LED, are becoming accustomed to various facets of information regarding the fixtures that we decide to invest into.Take for instance the multiple LED brands out there that advertise fixtures as 240W but actually only draw ~130W form the wall. Now a days, between what's out there currently, COB fixtures are fairly straight forward with what they pull and we can now, with the aid of data sheets, determine how many watts are being dissipated from the COBS that we use, allowing us to determine who's selling the most amount of light at the most affordable cost. I thought it was worth mentioning, because I think it's a really cool subject.
Also, how come no one noticed this before?
View attachment 3469582
If you put one finger where the red circle is and another finger on the blue circle, you will get shocked by some serious juice. Just a forewarning to anyone considering buying into the W90.
He doesn't know how to ground. At least that's what I heard .He's probably grounded....
witless clown, internet nit wits are more prevalent than internet tough guys.
That's the thing, you're comparing oranges with apples and I didn't address that. COB fixtures represent and offer a different approach to how we calculate and associate costs with various fixtures. By comparing total watts with one fixture to another, we limit ourselves to what we happen to be valuing. In other words, if someone offers an inefficient unit for 500$, which pulls a total of 500W, then that's 1$ per watt, which would be a decent deal in today's lighting market. Now let's add the fact that that 500W unit only dissipates 100W from the light source. Now it's evident that it costs 5$ per watt (dissipated). We could even go further in comparing the core value of that fixture if we knew how efficient the lights were. For this example, let's say the lights are 50% efficient. It's now 10$ per watt (PAR), which isn't a great deal in comparison to other options.You come off as pathetic trying to discredit other company's lights to make yourself look better.
I've PM'd with EH recently in the last couple days, I had asked about the solder spots, he said the production units will be coated with a silicone, there are no live lines to get electrocuted by. Unlike your lights.
As for my math goes, it is not off. We're talking about total watts vs. total watts. You can break it down by watts going to the LEDs.
$174 divided by 80w = $2.17 a watt
$122 divided by (58 actual watts, let's assume they have a 90% efficient driver, and a 3w fan, I would think that cheapo light doesn't have a 90% efficient driver, maybe 80-85%, but let's assume it's 90%) that's about 50w divided into $122, that's $2.44 a watt.
Your company name is "Heaven Bright", no? Are you a religious person? You don't act like it. Dumb company name regardless.
If I were EH, I'd sue you for libel.
How would I know if I were a consumer?Hey Aqurium Pants,that's a mock up unit to take pictures not a production unit.
Damn, Giga, you made me look decent!
Oh I don't know,maybe go to the Area 51 web site where they are taking pre-orders and read. It says the pic is a prototype and the prodution units will be maroon with a white reflector.How would I know if I were a consumer?
That's the thing, you're comparing oranges with apples and I didn't address that. COB fixtures represent and offer a different approach to how we calculate and associate costs with various fixtures. By comparing total watts with one fixture to another, we limit ourselves to what we happen to be valuing. In other words, if someone offers an inefficient unit for 500$, which pulls a total of 500W, then that's 1$ per watt, which would be a decent deal in today's lighting market. Now let's add the fact that that 500W unit only dissipates 100W from the light source. Now it's evident that it costs 5$ per watt (dissipated). We could even go further in comparing the core value of that fixture if we knew how efficient the lights were. For this example, let's say the lights are 50% efficient. It's now 10$ per watt (PAR), which isn't a great deal in comparison to other options.
So you see, your approach doesn't take advantage of the resources and data that are available and thus leaves your mathematical consideration obsolete.
You're a hater, so I expect you to hate, Giga.
How would I know if I were a consumer?