The_Herban_Legend
Well-Known Member
Your sentence should read: My grammar is not good... You're welcome.My grammar isn't so good. But since we are talking about periods. Are you on yours?
Your sentence should read: My grammar is not good... You're welcome.My grammar isn't so good. But since we are talking about periods. Are you on yours?
Thank you, I win again!Don't worry about it.
I'm putting you on ignore
I hear yours don't exist.I hear your growing skills aren't either. OUCH! Did I just go there?
that's not true at all, and i would challenge you to find a biased piece of reporting from them, ever. but that is pointless since they do not do biased reporting.Bucky, NPR is to the left as fox is to the right.
how did you derive at that conclusion?I am far more intelligent than I give myself credit for.
Simple, I added 3, then subtracted 2.how did you derive at that conclusion?
you should obtain for now on.Simple, I added 3, then subtracted 2.
On social issues, I am very liberal. NPR is one of several sources I gather my data from on politics and current events. NPR definitely leans to the left. I misspoke, they are not as far to the left as fox news is to the right but they still lean left.that's not true at all, and i would challenge you to find a biased piece of reporting from them, ever. but that is pointless since they do not do biased reporting.
but if it were true, you'd be saying that the left is the most informed audience in america, while the right is less informed than those who watch no news at all.
lullerskates.
You should capitalize the first word of each sentence.you should obtain for now on.
then you should have no problem showing me all the biased reporting they are putting out.NPR definitely leans to the left.
It's not so much that they report on a bias towards the left, it's that they don't dig deep into stories that involve political figures to the left. Examples; Benghazi, Operation fast and furious, etc etc.then you should have no problem showing me all the biased reporting they are putting out.
don't be shy, be a legend.
The fact that you are defending NPR speaks volumes. Not once have I ever heard you defend fox news. Coincidence? I think not!then you should have no problem showing me all the biased reporting they are putting out.
don't be shy, be a legend.
well over two dozen stories on all aspects of beghazi, retard.It's not so much that they report on a bias towards the left, it's that they don't dig deep into stories that involve political figures to the left. Examples; Benghazi, Operation fast and furious, etc etc.
why would i defend fox news? people who watch it are less informed than those who watch no news at all.The fact that you are defending NPR speaks volumes. Not once have I ever heard you defend fox news. Coincidence? I think not!
I didn't say they didn't report on these incidents, what I said was they don't dig as deep if the political figure is on the left. Practice your comprehension skills.well over two dozen stories on all aspects of beghazi, retard.
http://www.npr.org/tags/162350245/benghazi-attack
another two dozen+ on gun running to mexico (which started under bush).
http://www.npr.org/tags/137200249/fast-and-furious
you are simply wrong in every conceivable way.
NPR is less biased than fox news but still biased to the left. If one deep throats a cock and one licks a cock, are they not both cocksuckers?why would i defend fox news? people who watch it are less informed than those who watch no news at all.
NPR is completely unbiased and has the best informed viewers of anyone.
you need to provide citation for all these retarded claims you are making.I did't say they didn't report on these incidents, what I said was they don't dig as deep if the political figure is on the left. Practice your comprehension skills.
then it should be super easy for you to post examples of left-biased reporting from them.NPR is less biased than fox news but still biased to the left.
lol. legendary.I think you meant most not "best" lol. REATARD!