Bernie rebounds with overflow crowd...

[420mon]

It was a guess.

I'll allow that maybe you didn't whack your largest penis on riu as a teen and you obtained sexual gratification thru some kind of feces related behavior?

Mon noticed penis envy as well, not Mon fault Mon have three legs!

 

[OddBall1st]

In terms of when the unborn becomes a being some people would recognize as human, yes earlier is "better".

I'll assume it's easier for some psychologically, and for most physiologically, to rid their body of something smaller and less developed earlier in pregnancy.

I`m actually one of those guys that`ll give them both barrels if she waits too long.

 

[schuylaar]

I don't take prescription medicine and rarely take anything that can be bought off the shelf, my lady is an herbalist and fixes me up. I eat right and exercise daily, plus I have a clean conscience.

I also have supported myself since I was a teenager, a very long time ago. I don't like to impose on other people or be part of redistributing their stuff....do you know anybody like that?

fascinating.

what do you call what the right does when 'buying' law in order to re-distribute to themselves?

making a rape victim keep the product of same? isn't rape a forcible event?

total fail, sasquatch.

 

[schuylaar]

Look you twisting little bitch,...that was a reply to rob as to what is the rape victim supposed to do. Nice fucking try. It don`t get answered by you and sets no time frame. Ya quoted it once incomplete and called it a time frame then complete and say I`m bitch`n,....Screw you and your twisting attempt,...

it's just his unorthodox way of trolling..never cite; yet everyone's a liar.

 

[OddBall1st]

it's just his unorthodox way of trolling..never cite; yet everyone's a liar.

One of many signs they are taking on more water than they can pump out......

 

[OddBall1st]

That has one ending.......

 

[Rob Roy]

fascinating.

what do you call what the right does when 'buying' law in order to re-distribute to themselves?

making a rape victim keep the product of same? isn't rape a forcible event?

total fail, sasquatch.

Just because I point out that forcible redistribution is wrong, doesn't mean I endorse crony capitalism. I reject both the welfare and the warfare state, they arise from the same institutional systemic flaw which you never address Ms. Obedient one.

Nor does it mean I endorse government involvement in abortion, that would include preventing abortion or abetting abortion.


Your ability to think out of the box is limited and for every situation, you seem to automatically think there must be an external third party authority with a monopoly on force that intervenes and makes the "rulz".

You are not doing a good job of questioning authority ... total fail.

 

[Rob Roy]

Mon noticed penis envy as well, not Mon fault Mon have three legs!

3 legs?

You must have a helluva time finding shoes.

 

[althor]

fascinating.

what do you call what the right does when 'buying' law in order to re-distribute to themselves?

making a rape victim keep the product of same? isn't rape a forcible event?

total fail, sasquatch.

You say that as if Liberals arent "buying" laws as well. That is how the system works on all sides.

 

[schuylaar]

You say that as if Liberals arent "buying" laws as well. That is how the system works on all sides.

um, actually, that is not what i was saying.

all billionaires leverage their position in order to carve-out the world they wish..some are more responsible than others. take the gates' for example..they are not leaving their wealth to their children.

RR likes to spin the physical act of 'force' to his advantage..unfortunately, the true law of 'spin' is that it can be spun back..any good debater know this.

 

[althor]

um, actually, that is not what i was saying.

all billionaires leverage their position in order to carve-out the world they wish..some are more responsible than others. take the gates' for example..they are not leaving their wealth to their children.

RR likes to spin the physical act of 'force' to his advantage..unfortunately, the true law of 'spin' is that it can be spun back..any good debater know this.

I see.

 

[schuylaar]

Just because I point out that forcible redistribution is wrong, doesn't mean I endorse crony capitalism. I reject both the welfare and the warfare state, they arise from the same institutional systemic flaw which you never address Ms. Obedient one.

Nor does it mean I endorse government involvement in abortion, that would include preventing abortion or abetting abortion.


Your ability to think out of the box is limited and for every situation, you seem to automatically think there must be an external third party authority with a monopoly on force that intervenes and makes the "rulz".

You are not doing a good job of questioning authority ... total fail.

 

[Padawanbater2]

You say that as if Liberals arent "buying" laws as well. That is how the system works on all sides.

And that's the most significant problem we face in politics today. Nobody, liberal or conservative or anything in between should be content with this. Yet very few people and even fewer politicians are talking about it. The apathy of Americans on this issue disgusts me.

 

[Rob Roy]

And that's the most significant problem we face in politics today. Nobody, liberal or conservative or anything in between should be content with this. Yet very few people and even fewer politicians are talking about it. The apathy of Americans on this issue disgusts me.

The problem with political solutions is they are often only solutions for people of a given mindset and impediments to people that do not hold that same mindset.

The idea that thru involuntary interactions a one size fits all political edict will ensure fairness is oxymoronic. Why? The element of involuntaryism and the inclusion of systemic coercion from the get go, make it self evident.

Political solutions (now there's an oxymoron) which arise from a coercion based system will usually leave somebody in a worse circumstance than they would have been with no intrusion at all.

The question that should be addressed isn't how to make a faulty system work, but which alternatives to that faulty system might bring more equitable living circumstances to individual people. This question rarely is understood, considered or asked, hence the present paradigm and the continued turd polishing in hopes the turd will magically metamorphisize (sic) into a shining jewel. Good luck pressing excrement into a diamond.

 

[althor]

And that's the most significant problem we face in politics today. Nobody, liberal or conservative or anything in between should be content with this. Yet very few people and even fewer politicians are talking about it. The apathy of Americans on this issue disgusts me.

Of course the only people who can change it are those who profit from it.

 

[Padawanbater2]

Of course the only people who can change it are those who profit from it.

Not entirely true. Article V of the Constitution outlines how to overcome an exact issue like this;

"Article V

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate."

It's difficult but not impossible, and it certainly won't happen overnight, but we can fix this