i'm totally mac myself..everything 'i'.
Well said!!this is your choice..that's what america is all about.
obama has nothing to do with..it's the insurance companies.
further, you hurt yourself overall because much of the coverage is about 'well-care' circumventing illness that could have been prevented if you had coverage..your post above is proof of illogical mind-set 'go to clinics when necessary'..male definition of 'when necessary': when it's about to fall off or you can't stand the pain any further.
this is what costs the insurance companies and american people so much money as often times we have to pay for your illness at stage 3 or 4, trying to keep your ass, alive when if you would have went to 'well care' screenings, it could have been caught at stage 1.
let me ask this..if you had a choice of prostate cancer stage 1, or prostate cancer stage 3..which would you choose?
The answer is yes, you get sent a form that you file with your Federal tax return.
Take your outrage over socialized medicine and vote for the socialist?
an ounce of prevention is worth..?
Several out right lies in there. The Tea Party doesn't run the Republican Party, Palin never said "I can see Russia from my house", climate charge isn't science, Clinton was impeached for perjury. But facts don't matter.
it's in it's infancy, red and there are other families like @neosapien who now have a policy significantly better than he had at 960% of the savings.
There wasn't a Win9, so you might be right.
the far right most certainly does..what did we gain from this? anyone?
The bill was designed to back-load all the expenses until after 2016, thus collapsing after Obama's term. There are no savings, costs are just shifted to someone else. I don't recall him saying his policy was "significantly better".it's in it's infancy, red and there are other families like @neosapien who now have a policy significantly better than he had at 960% of the savings.
it works, it just needs to be re-tooled a bit.
you know some of the greatest software engineers around (including doer) cannot write a program that's viable from the get go..it just doesn't happen that way.
Oh I'm sorry.
The far right? Really?the far right most certainly does..what did we gain from this? anyone?
Cite where I said that or be branded a liar. Ooops, too late.
i just posted i wasn't outraged..i'm happy to see the the ACA is working as desgined and that there are RIU members who are benefiting including those huge naysayers like @nitro harley.
how does a paper trade constitute a loss, red?
he's paying 960% less
You posted "neo, this is a good time to take your outrage and work for the candidate" For everyone benefiting, there are others paying for that benefit.
You said there was "960% savings", you emphasized the savings. So you were lying.
You clearly have no idea what a paper trade is. It constitutes neither a loss nor a gain.