Zimbabwe: American lion killer's extradition being sought

Wavels

Well-Known Member
Citation required*

ya dingus
Here you are...
Obama and the ‘Warmest Year on Record’
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/04/obama-and-the-warmest-year-on-record/

This sounds like an undisputed fact, but it is not. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NASA and the Japan Meteorological Agency all did report that 2014 was the warmest year since record-keeping began in the late 1800s, but there are uncertainties to that finding.


As the chart shows, NOAA found that the likelihood of 2014 being the warmest year was approximately 48 percent.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Here you are...
Obama and the ‘Warmest Year on Record’
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/04/obama-and-the-warmest-year-on-record/

This sounds like an undisputed fact, but it is not. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NASA and the Japan Meteorological Agency all did report that 2014 was the warmest year since record-keeping began in the late 1800s, but there are uncertainties to that finding.


As the chart shows, NOAA found that the likelihood of 2014 being the warmest year was approximately 48 percent.
No, that is not NOAA or NASA. The claim I made was that NASA and NOAA concluded unequivocally that 2014 was the hottest on record. I even started a thread with an article. You may have uncertainties stemming from your google searches which yield other media outlets, but they do not dispute the claim because they do not come from NASA or NOAA.

You should just admit that NASA and NOAA did in fact conclude unequivocally that 2014 was the hottest year on record, ya dingus.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Apparently you seemingly wish that this were the case, alas, you are mistaken.
Ho hummm.
Apparently you think that NASA and NOAA did not state unequivocally that 2014 was the hottest year on record, but you keep citing media outlets that are not NASA or NOAA to support this opinion of yours, ya dingus.
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
Apparently you think that NASA and NOAA did not state unequivocally that 2014 was the hottest year on record, but you keep citing media outlets that are not NASA or NOAA to support this opinion of yours, ya dingus.
Wow, the reek of your desperation is singeing my nostrils, keep on flailing...hahaha
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Apparently you think that NASA and NOAA did not state unequivocally that 2014 was the hottest year on record, but you keep citing media outlets that are not NASA or NOAA to support this opinion of yours, ya dingus.
Climate change is bullshit. There is a study financed by Exxon and Koch run out of a pole building in Montana that proves it This is science. In Science even if 1 study contradicts 10000 others it cant be true
 

see4

Well-Known Member
You'll notice that nowhere in my post did I defend him. I just stated the relevant facts, as we know them. You need to holler at the animal conservationists and ethologists that support and license these hunts. They disagree with you and you know, SCIENCE!
Not a single "animal conservationist" or "ethologist" supported that hunt, nor did they give him license to track, trap, and illegally kill Cecil, and then try to get rid of any evidence that the animal was marked for tracking. You just tried to feed me a bunch of bullshit, and you know it. The government, wrongly, gave him a license to hunt a lion, not a hunt a marked research lion. And better yet, that is besides the point. The point is, with less than 20,000 lions on the entire planet, a license to kill ANY of them is wrong. And scientist and conservationist would agree. Well any NOT from Faux Noose.

Translating: If everyone just believed everything liberals told them, we wouldn't argue.

No thanks, most of the time you resemble a bunch of monkeys trying to fuck a doorknob. In a majority of the cases, time reveals the accuracy of that description.
When all else fails resort to shit slinging and unfounded assertions.


I am SO happy you are not in any position, to anyone, to make life affecting [critical] decisions.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
And who finances NASA and NOAA?
Yup, the virtuous, pristine dollars of the unbiased US Govt!
Dream on.
So what you're saying is, that you are in fact a dingus who admits that NASA and NOAA did in fact conclude unequivocally that 2014 was the hottest year on record, thus reversing your position and admiting that I was correct to ridicule you for being a dingus.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
So what you're saying is, that you are in fact a dingus who admits that NASA and NOAA did in fact conclude unequivocally that 2014 was the hottest year on record, thus reversing your position and admiting that I was correct to ridicule you for being a dingus.

It doesn`t matter who`s right,....heating oil will go down if the earth warms and we are gonna have to cool it down to keep the prices high in winter........................
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
So what you're saying is, that you are in fact a dingus who admits that NASA and NOAA did in fact conclude unequivocally that 2014 was the hottest year on record, thus reversing your position and admiting that I was correct to ridicule you for being a dingus.
Wow, desperate is as desperate posts...holy cow!
Misconstrue much?
 

GreatwhiteNorth

Global Moderator
Staff member
with less than 20,000 lions on the entire planet, a license to kill ANY of them is wrong.
Humanoids are not exactly a beacon of intelligence when it comes to preserving the biological diversity of this planet.
(I really wish this article was from "The onion"). :cry:

Another Cecil? Researcher for New York museum kills rare bird in name of science, draws outrage from PETA
BY David Boroff
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Updated: Monday, October 12, 2015, 8:35 PM

This moustached kingfisher was found and euthanized by New York scientist Christopher Filardi.
A researcher for New York's American Museum of Natural History has outraged animal rights activists after killing a rare bird that had been unseen for half a century — all in the name of science.

Anger from all corners of the Internet prompted theAudubon Society to publish a defensefrom New York-based scientist Christopher Filardi after he discovered the moustached kingfisher on the island of Guadalcanal, and then promptly killed it in order to study it as a specimen, a common practice known as "collecting," often applied to birds not as rare.

"It is a tired and nonsensical, self-serving claim that you must kill some animals in the name of research so as to study them enough to save them," PETA Senior Director Colleen O’Brien wrote in an email to the Daily News on Monday. "This argument is as daft as Walter Palmer saying he shot Cecil the lion with a high-powered crossbow to save other lions.

"To search for and find an animal of a rare species — an individual with feelings, interests, a home, and perhaps a mate—only to kill him is perverse, cruel, and the sort of act that has led to the extinction of other animals who were also viewed as 'specimens,'" she continued. "All that was needed to document this rare bird was compassion, awe, and a camera, not disregard and a death warrant."

Filardi wrote in his defense that "this was neither an easy decision nor one made in the spur of the moment."

Although he said that this was not a "trophy hunt," many say his actions were brutal and unwarranted. It comes on the heels of the killing of Cecil the lion by Minnesota dentist Walter Palmer in Zimbabwe earlier this year.

Filardi, currently overseas, could not be reached for comment by the Daily News. According to his bio on the museum's website, Filardi "has a long history of conducting conservation and education activities."

There are approximately 250 to 1,000 mature moustached kingfishers left on the planet,according to Discover. Filardi insisted taking this bird would not endanger the species, and would provide enormous scientific benefits.

"With this first modern voucher of the kingfisher, the only adult male, we now have a comprehensive set of material for molecular, morphological, toxicological, and plumage studies that are unavailable from blood samples, individual feathers, or photographs," he wrote.

After the bird was found, the museum boasted of the find on Twitter.

“These were, indeed, the first-ever photos of the male moustached kingfisher alive,” Chris Matyszczykwrote on CNET. "It didn’t live much longer."

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/researcher-ny-museum-kills-rare-bird-science-article-1.2394167
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Humanoids are not exactly a beacon of intelligence when it comes to preserving the biological diversity of this planet.
(I really wish this article was from "The onion"). :cry:

Another Cecil? Researcher for New York museum kills rare bird in name of science, draws outrage from PETA
BY David Boroff
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Updated: Monday, October 12, 2015, 8:35 PM

This moustached kingfisher was found and euthanized by New York scientist Christopher Filardi.
A researcher for New York's American Museum of Natural History has outraged animal rights activists after killing a rare bird that had been unseen for half a century — all in the name of science.

Anger from all corners of the Internet prompted theAudubon Society to publish a defensefrom New York-based scientist Christopher Filardi after he discovered the moustached kingfisher on the island of Guadalcanal, and then promptly killed it in order to study it as a specimen, a common practice known as "collecting," often applied to birds not as rare.

"It is a tired and nonsensical, self-serving claim that you must kill some animals in the name of research so as to study them enough to save them," PETA Senior Director Colleen O’Brien wrote in an email to the Daily News on Monday. "This argument is as daft as Walter Palmer saying he shot Cecil the lion with a high-powered crossbow to save other lions.

"To search for and find an animal of a rare species — an individual with feelings, interests, a home, and perhaps a mate—only to kill him is perverse, cruel, and the sort of act that has led to the extinction of other animals who were also viewed as 'specimens,'" she continued. "All that was needed to document this rare bird was compassion, awe, and a camera, not disregard and a death warrant."

Filardi wrote in his defense that "this was neither an easy decision nor one made in the spur of the moment."

Although he said that this was not a "trophy hunt," many say his actions were brutal and unwarranted. It comes on the heels of the killing of Cecil the lion by Minnesota dentist Walter Palmer in Zimbabwe earlier this year.

Filardi, currently overseas, could not be reached for comment by the Daily News. According to his bio on the museum's website, Filardi "has a long history of conducting conservation and education activities."

There are approximately 250 to 1,000 mature moustached kingfishers left on the planet,according to Discover. Filardi insisted taking this bird would not endanger the species, and would provide enormous scientific benefits.

"With this first modern voucher of the kingfisher, the only adult male, we now have a comprehensive set of material for molecular, morphological, toxicological, and plumage studies that are unavailable from blood samples, individual feathers, or photographs," he wrote.

After the bird was found, the museum boasted of the find on Twitter.

“These were, indeed, the first-ever photos of the male moustached kingfisher alive,” Chris Matyszczykwrote on CNET. "It didn’t live much longer."

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/researcher-ny-museum-kills-rare-bird-science-article-1.2394167
WTF!!!
 
Top