Absolutely nothing wrong with that, even in winter we should be as warm as we like and it shouldn't be expensive- read inefficient- to do so.
Exactly. Turns out there's a lot of data.
There are bacteria that thrive at >100 degrees centigrade. Judging by most of the commentariat here, I prefer the bacteria.
Moronic at best. At least what you define as "fine".
To suggest the earth will be a scorched, uninhabited ember is not exactly brilliant.
A warmer climate is not all bad.
That is exactly what will happen eventually, barring some unforeseen astrological event.
Actually...no. The data feeds are updated daily, and it took less than 10 days to put together that dubious announcement of theirs, probably because they had to go "correct" a bunch of stuff to fit their narrative (as per their own methodology, CLEARLY stated on the GISS-data sources page). If one station shows COLDER temps than the "average" by some unspecified margin, they yank it from the dataset.
Not all, but mostly bad..
Where is the article that says this? So did the numbers get changed during the bush years as well?
Yeah, when the sun turns into a red giant... in a couple of billion years. In the meantime the earth will be struck by multiple planet-killing comets, and space aliens will invade and eat every damn one of the delectable humans roaming the planet.
I thought Jesus was gonna come back before that! Lmao
Get the book by Dr Jared Diamond, 'Collapse'. He agrees with you and discusses how it will happen. It's a grim read.
I got one for you: Don't shit where you eat.
in case you were too busy training to be a cop to notice, you cited NPR the other day to back up some point you were trying to make.
Got lots of solar panels and want to add wind turbines in 2016.
Tasty Spoonful #2:
