abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
This does not demonstrate wealth creation by the stock market in the absence of labor.On the flip side, if the market were to crash, labor would significantly decrease.
This does not demonstrate wealth creation by the stock market in the absence of labor.On the flip side, if the market were to crash, labor would significantly decrease.
Great point!You didn't answer this when I asked before, maybe you just missed it so I'll ask again.
Do you consider QE by the FED to be labor? Because over a trillion in "wealth" was created out of thin air, imagine that.
This does not demonstrate wealth creation in the absence of labor.So when we talk about the wealth disparity in this country what we really mean is the currency disparity and it's totally different?
ftr, i really do believe there is a difference between wealth and currency, but not in the way we are talking about itt.
I gave you one, of millions of examples via Mark Zuckerberg.This does not demonstrate wealth creation by the stock market in the absence of labor.
No, you didn't. Facebook is a massive digital infrastructure and enterprise supported by thousands of toiling coders and programmers. In short, labor created that.I gave you one of millions of examples via Mark Zuckerberg.
We agree on most issues but I stand my ground on this one. Labor is only one of many resources needed to create wealth from innovation.This does not demonstrate wealth creation in the absence of labor.
Labor creates all wealth.
Wrong! When Facebook went public, how much wealth do you think was created? Have a read if you don't want to take my word.No, you didn't. Facebook is a massive digital infrastructure and enterprise supported by thousands of toiling coders and programmers. In short, labor created that.
It is by far the most important, because wealth can not be crated in the absence of labor.We agree on most issues but I stand my ground on this one. Labor is only one of many resources needed to create wealth from innovation.
I keep seeing mention of employees. I wonder what those employees do, I wonder what wealth would be created if there were no employees...Wrong! When Facebook went public, how much wealth do you think was created? Have a read if you don't want to take my word.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2072204/Facebook-IPO-create-1-000-millionaires-companys-rank-file.html
Did you note the mention of investors (labor free by the way)?I keep seeing mention of employees. I wonder what those employees do, I wonder what wealth would be created if there were no employees...
Not labor free. What do investors invest? They invest wealth. Where did they get it? What happens after they invest it? Yet more labor.Did you note the mention of investors (labor free by the way)?
How does it not? Over trillion was created without labor. If you are talking about wealth being monetary then I don't get how you can ignore this.This does not demonstrate wealth creation in the absence of labor.
Labor creates all wealth.
Stock Market?Not labor free. What do investors invest? They invest wealth. Where did they get it? What happens after they invest it? Yet more labor.
Wealth is not created simply because currency is printed. This is why printing money with out the creation of wealth in the economy simply devalues said currency proportionately to what was printed minus how much wealth was created.How does it not? Over trillion was created without labor. If you are talking about wealth being monetary then I don't get how you can ignore this.
I can dig a hole in my yard and create nothing but a hole. If the local bank dumped all of their quarters in my hole, then I have wealth that I didn't create. Sure, somebody's labor made those quarters or mined the minerals, is that what you mean? If it is, then I go back to the FED digitizing currency again.
I'm not a fan of our monetary system but it's what we all live by. To say a Trillion dollars is not real wealth under our current system is false.
As has been established, the stock market creates zero new wealth, it simply trades existing wealth and squeezes value from fluctuating scarcity (supply and demand).Stock Market?
Interest incomeNot labor free. What do investors invest? They invest wealth. Where did they get it? What happens after they invest it? Yet more labor.
AC probably won't come to terms on this issue because it may not fall inline with his political ideology, but labor is only a resource which can be significantly reduced through automation.Wealth is created by innovation and requires resources, like labor.How does it not? Over trillion was created without labor. If you are talking about wealth being monetary then I don't get how you can ignore this.
I can dig a hole in my yard and create nothing but a hole. If the local bank dumped all of their quarters in my hole, then I have wealth that I didn't create. Sure, somebody's labor made those quarters or mined the minerals, is that what you mean? If it is, then I go back to the FED digitizing currency again.
I'm not a fan of our monetary system but it's what we all live by. To say a Trillion dollars is not real wealth under our current system is false.
We agree that it devalues the money, which also devalues labor. It doesn't change that wealth was created without labor.Wealth is not created simply because currency is printed. This is why printing money with out the creation of wealth in the economy simply devalues said currency proportionately to what was printed minus how much wealth was created.
Deciphering...AC probably won't come to terms on this issue because it may not fall inline with his political ideology, but labor is only a resource which can be significantly reduced through automation.Wealth is created by innovation and requires resources, like labor.
Wealth was not created with out labor, since wealth is not created by the printing of currency.We agree that it devalues the money, which also devalues labor. It doesn't change that wealth was created without labor.