Do you mean 77-120-52? What brand is it?Hi
on the soil that I use it says N=77 P=120 K=520.
Should I use nutrients for my flowering clones or am I going to burn them?
Those numbers don't make any sense. You can't even get fertilizer with numbers that high; anything over one hundred means there's OVER 100% of the nutrient in it?!Do you mean 77-120-52? What brand is it?
Those numbers don't make any sense. You can't even get fertilizer with numbers that high; anything over one hundred means there's OVER 100% of the nutrient in it?!
Even as ppm numbers these don't add up. That's waaaay too much potassium.
I know lots of people getting great results with Jacks 20-20-20, better ratios all the way through.Yeah maybe throw that stuff away and get some Jacks 10-30-20.
Interesting, I'll keep that in mind. So don't even bother with the blossom booster during flower?I know lots of people getting great results with Jacks 20-20-20, better ratios all the way through.
Whatever it is it sounds way out of whack/balance. lolI thought that too. I wonder if its 7.7-12.0-52.0? or something like that. The trailing zeros make no sense though. 2² + 2² ≈ 717 ...something does not compute.
Are you hearing anything about Jacks 15-30-15? I just started using it, seems ok so far. Time will tell.I know lots of people getting great results with Jacks 20-20-20, better ratios all the way through.
As ppm numbers it does make a certain amount of sense- but I wouldn't recommend the ratio without mixing it with something else, like calcium nitrate.I thought that too. I wonder if its 7.7-12.0-52.0? or something like that. The trailing zeros make no sense though. 2² + 2² ≈ 717 ...something does not compute.
Cannabis really prefers N-P-K ratios of around 3-2-4. So even in bloom, they don't need as much P as they do of both N and K. That 20-20-20 mix is close enough to use all the way through and as I said, I have plenty of friends who swear by it and they grow amazing bud.Interesting, I'll keep that in mind. So don't even bother with the blossom booster during flower?
My thinking was purely from a business perspective, the ink to print the point and the zeros cost money...and since they represent absolutely nothing other then consistency with the N value, seems like a waste of money....But I get what you're saying.As ppm numbers it does make a certain amount of sense- but I wouldn't recommend the ratio without mixing it with something else, like calcium nitrate.
My dry nutrient mix is 5-11-26 plus micros; 'hi K' hydroponic mix from Hydro-gardens.com. It's meant to be used in roughly equal parts with calcium nitrate (15.5-0-0-19%Ca), and to create a bloom mix I add a bit of MKP, (0-52-32).
OP, tell us more about this package of nutrients and maybe we can help you?
This sounds like an old Miracle Grow ratio. I'd lean away from it because the P is very high.Are you hearing anything about Jacks 15-30-15? I just started using it, seems ok so far. Time will tell.
Maybe this will help? It is in Swedish but numbers are numbers.Those numbers don't make any sense. You can't even get fertilizer with numbers that high; anything over one hundred means there's OVER 100% of the nutrient in it?!
Even as ppm numbers these don't add up. That's waaaay too much potassium.
Here is a Picture from the lable.As ppm numbers it does make a certain amount of sense- but I wouldn't recommend the ratio without mixing it with something else, like calcium nitrate.
My dry nutrient mix is 5-11-26 plus micros; 'hi K' hydroponic mix from Hydro-gardens.com. It's meant to be used in roughly equal parts with calcium nitrate (15.5-0-0-19%Ca), and to create a bloom mix I add a bit of MKP, (0-52-32).
OP, tell us more about this package of nutrients and maybe we can help you?
It is German and called park land.Do you mean 77-120-52? What brand is it?
Plants grow and I get high so yes it works but are those numbers even possible? Or maybe a typo?Seems like a lot of calcium and not enough nitrogen but if it works, it works...
I see little reason to think they'd be lying deliberately.Plants grow and I get high so yes it works but are those numbers even possible? Or maybe a typo?