budlover13
King Tut
He won't do it because people in private meetings tell him not to.
Read into that what you will, but it"s true.
Read into that what you will, but it"s true.
Yeah I think that is quite possibly what he plans.Maybe he'll do it on his way out of office.
No downside and he gets to rightly claim that he's just following the stated will of the people. And as a legacy, it's really not bad!Yeah I think that is quite possibly what he plans.
The best part about that isNo downside and he gets to rightly claim that he's just following the stated will of the people. And as a legacy, it's really not bad!
I get a little frightened when you talk about teenage virgins, given that your social life consists of talking to the spider in the dusty corner of your moms basement. You've got to promise me, you won't try to enact your fantasies and erm "remodel" the basement to include a secret dungeon again. Last time you did that, you nearly got caught.No. He is not staunch. He has allowed progress to be made. He has refrained from using his appointed authority to enforce existing laws. You just sound like a teenage, cheetoh fingered, fedora wearing virgin who just finished reading The Virtue of Selfishness by Ayn Rand.
Unlike alcohol, it's non addictive..a psychological habit at best yet I can think of so many things more habitual like sugar (tobacco which doesn't cause cancer..heheh) that calls for nationwide health because we are the most unhealthiest industrialized nation on earth.However, he has chosen not to reschedule. He never promised to reschedule, and he was not elected as a result of his liberal approach to cannabis. He has never been pro-legalization since he's been president. He has only expressed that he thinks the approach to prohibition was heavy handed and that it's just a bad habit but no worse than alcohol.
No downside and he gets to rightly claim that he's just following the stated will of the people. And as a legacy, it's really not bad!
But it will no longer be unlawful to possess, regardless of states rights, as fed trumps state for benefit of constituents..always.The best part about that is
Once he undoes it people will scream if it gets put back on. But rescheduling will not legalize weed
Not sure about thatBut it will no longer be unlawful to possess, regardless of states rights, as fed trumps state for benefit of constituents..always.
<schuylaar ducks and takes cover>
Personally, I am a states rights fan.But it will no longer be unlawful to possess, regardless of states rights, as fed trumps state for benefit of constituents..always.
<schuylaar ducks and takes cover>
They tend to be pro state as opposed to pro constituent which is why fed trumps because states have been found to be bound to those the cash rather than their peoples.Personally, I am a states rights fan.
You can fool some of the people ALL the time. P.T. Barnum, republican political strategist.They tend to be pro state as opposed to pro constituent which is why fed trumps because states have been found to be bound to those the cash rather than their peoples.
One vote per, people.. regardless of station.. the way it should be..last I looked, it's still 'we the people' not 'we the millionaires'..