Lord Kanti
Well-Known Member
Property is an unalienable right. So you feel there are limits on INALIENABLE rights?
Ben Carson says he would “intensify” the war on drugs
- Thread starter squarepush3r
- Start date
Property is an unalienable right. So you feel there are limits on INALIENABLE rights?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
too bad you're not, just some loser instead.
most of us would realize that income above a certain percentage is already taxed pretty heavily, so you're looking at another $500,000 in taxes to make $500,000. smart people woul[d take that trade.
you're not smart though.
Lord Kanti
Well-Known Member
Are you not familiar with the declaration of American rights, or even John Locke?
Lord Kanti
Well-Known Member
Yet billionaires and corporate entities exist. Speak for yourself, not "most people".
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
Are you not familiar with my penis?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
sorry, i should have said "most of us smart people".
because a smart person realizes that more money is more money, no matter how heavily taxed.
Lord Kanti
Well-Known Member
Considering how much time you spend on your ass trolling an Internet forum, one can safely assume that you aren't familiar with it either.
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
That's kind of funny. Did your mum help you write that one?
Lord Kanti
Well-Known Member
She's nursing my dying dog right now, so no, she didn't have time. She messaged me about herbs that she ordered and I'm Considering bringing over some tincture. I've read that cannabis can prevent the liver from processing medicine and can result in an overdose of the usually correct amount of medication. I'll grab the quote in a moment.
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
That was a fucking great story bro. I mean that. Seriously. Can you maybe tell it again? Wait... let me go see if I can find a fuck first.....
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Go ahead and quote the Constitution where you think it allows you to accrue as much wealth as possible
And if you come into wealth by exploiting, abusing, coercing or intimidating people, or using inhumane business practices, then you've unjustly acquired it and don't rightfully own any of it
Lord Kanti
Well-Known Member
You never clarified that the property was ill gotten. Such assumption has no place in civilized debate. You merely asked if there should be limitations on property, nothing more.
I've also cited the basis of my standings.
Lord Kanti
Well-Known Member
I found this claim online and is why I am concerned with CBD for canines.
"WARNING!!! CBD OIL INACTIVATES CYTOCHROME P450 IN DOG'S LIVER WHICH IS RESPONSIBLE FOR METABOLIZING OVER 90% OF SYNTHETIC DRUGS SUCH AS: ANTIBIOTICS, ANTI-INFLAMATORIES, DE-WORMERS, DE-FLEAER. IF YOU ARE OR HAVE BEEN GIVING YOUR DOG CBD (CANNIBDIOL CANNABIS OIL) YOU MUST NOT GIVE HIM OR HER ANY KIND OF MEDICATION OR YOU WILL OVERDOSE YOUR DOG CAUSING ORGAN FAILURE AND DEATH (sad to say it, but my dog who was in quite good health died from this type of overdose intoxication due to the combined use of CBD OIL and other medications). I hope this forewarns someone who may be contemplating giving their dog CBD OIL, as it is VERY dangerous both for dogs and humans as it block the metabolization of all synthetic drugs as those listed above."
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
Well at least you are spamming some semi-useful info. Carry on.
Lord Kanti
Well-Known Member
You dragged my mother into this thread, I'm merely sharing what we're dealing with. I'm not asking for sympathy, but it would be great to know if THC, CBD, or other cannabinoids can cause a liver interaction that would render my dog's heart medication lethal. She said she ordered some herbs, I'm sitting on some "herb" and am contemplating whether or not I should dose my dying dog with cannabis or not. It would be a shame to out myself to my mother AND kill my dog.
From what I've read MMJ is not legal to administer to animals. It would be nice for politicians to not hinder the rights to medical cannabis for people and their pets / family members.
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
Ya good luck on that one. Smell ya later. I got plants to trim.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
That would be because growing marijuana may not be at the top of their priority list when picking candidates...
The only person that I did not hear advancing a bigger government agenda (Ben Carson illustrates how he would have no problem continuing to criminalize the populace) was Carlie Fiorina. I am paying more attention to her because she seems to get it in relation to how government control and regulation is strangling business and the economy and she is advocating less government rather than more.
I am surprised more people on this website are not more open minded about which side they have to choose candidates from.
Also, Carlie Fiorina would wipe the floor with Hillary Clinton in a debate. There would be nothing left but a frown and a wrinkled pantsuit.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
No it isn't. It comes from gov't. It is a gov't granted right. Gov't granted white men the right to own black people and gov't grants people the right to own the planet. You cen keep your toothbrush and underwear though, that inalienable.
Lord Kanti
Well-Known Member
That's odd, because Locke, Jefferson, or Franklin never placed such limits on liberty. It is in fact tyranny that attempts to limit such freedoms.
And as a matter of fact, the US government first granted black people the right to own other black people in a court of law, as the first American slave holder was a black man.