Not really. In a free market, government protectionism would, by definition, cease to exist, otherwise it wouldn't BE a free market... which makes your faulty observations about Corporations "taking over" absurd.
Corporations, or more correctly, service providers, without government protectionism would have to provide good service at a competitive rate or somebody else will since the artificial constraints to enter a given market would have been lifted.
You were able to completely misread what I wrote, or read it correctly but was utterly unable to fully grasp the ideas. That is my fault, I clearly was not able to spell it out for you in simple enough terms. Let me try again.
Business, more specifically, corporations exist to earn revenue by any means necessary; and government is there to make sure corporations do not earn that dollar in unscrupulous ways. Ya feel me so far bruh? Ok cool, moving along.
If government were to cease regulating and providing corporate oversight, more likely than not corporations would begin taking advantage of consumers, both informed and the not. And the idea that people would simply stop purchasing services or goods from those companies is simply absurd. Your notion of a free market, in that sense, is absurd. You may not agree, but are you still with me? Ok good.
Did you know, that at this very moment advertisers on national television are sending high frequency beeps that apps on your smart phone are picking up and sending back gathering consumer metrics without your knowledge? Would you argue that is a fair and just thing? Would you argue that government has no right to regulate that? Arstechnica -- read up on it. It's a nasty little discovery.
Anyway, I'm done. Viva la France!!
