If you can come up with an original question that is not copyright protected, then I will answer it. I am willing "to extend an olive branch", are you?
Really foolish stance to take since my citing "Time" is no different then you citing info. By that logic you should stop talking about politics at all. Which you should do.
But sure, ill play...you said.
Hillary Clinton supports the federal government's laws prohibiting marijuana, then tried to sound liberal by stating people should not be in prison for it. So what is her plan going to be? It sounds like she contradicted herself
Starting by disclaiming that I dont like Hillery....she is clearly just going after fence sitting votes. She's stating that she will recognize the law as it is, while agreeing that the law needs to be changed and promising that she will make strides to that end. That's not a contradiction. Its quite straight forward...
Will she do it? Is a better question. At this point she is willing to say whatever she needs to get as many votes as she can.
No different then trump...or any of them really.
So my rebuttal is this. Given Trumps business history and blatant disregard for his shareholders (as can be seen as recently as the 10/28 debate where he belittles people whom he lost $1Billion of their money as "its ok cause their not the nicest people") and given his open admittance time and again that he "bought politicians" showing a complete disregard for the system of governance hes attempting to enter, all to make a profit..... How do you feel that Trump is morally qualified to be POTUS and what makes you think
his word counts for anything?