UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
LOL!it's time to stop parroting Ruin Paul
but he declared victory. so he must be right.
LOL!it's time to stop parroting Ruin Paul
Bernie Sanders is likely just a wolf in sheeps clothing. When push came to shove he refused to get behind actually auditing the fed with Congress instead of some independent hack. I'd rather he got elected than Clinton or pretty much any of the other major candidates but that doesn't really say much of anything. I'm pretty sure Trump is Hitler reincarnate.Just because China makes a territorial claim doesn't mean it's automatically valid.
I'll agree that the United States definitely does want to pick fights, because it's profitable to those who have the most influence over our politicians.
If you don't like this, and I certainly don't, then it's time to stop parroting Ruin Paul and find a candidate who's actually talking about effective solutions.
He's not hard to find; Bernie Sanders is the ONLY one.
When your argument involves government = conflict and you guys are sitting there arguing about it this one time government stepped into something they shouldn't have... well... it does prove the point does it not? Or did you fail high school?LOL!
but he declared victory. so he must be right.
Same thing Afghanistan and Vietnam did.What is Syria going to do with all the craters it's about to inherit?
http://iranfrontpage.com/headlines/id/5703/
Bullshit opinion piece.Explain to me, as for a Russian from Moscow, this view is pro-Russian propaganda, or it has a grain of truth?
http://eaglerising.com/26795/the-obama-muslim-brotherhood-foreign-policy-has-officially-failed/
Thanks for the quick response, but there is no answer, only a few names unknown to me.Bullshit opinion piece.
Go to the "about us" page
SOUNDS exactly like you! How fucken ironic!LOL!
but he declared victory. so he must be right.
So you go from one Christian right wing web site to another. And they use each other as the source for their Story's.Thanks for the quick response, but there is no answer, only a few names unknown to me.
These statements I have seen elsewhere, comment on the merits, please.
http://usherald.com/former-cia-agent-says-obama-working-muslim-brotherhood-america/
I believe that the Syrian drama can not be dissociated from the religious relationship of the parties.
In my opinion, sharia is evil. I believe that the political support for the expansion of sharia is a crime against civilization.
Assad Alawites are far from the radical fanatics. They are fighting for a secular state, not shouting "Allahu Akbar", not beheading "infidels" that willingly makes his opponents.
The Christian right wing? I am an atheist.Christian right wing
Your sources of information are questionable and meritless.The Christian right wing? I am an atheist.
I have no political obligations to unpleasant allies that support the fighters for the establishment of Sharia law on the whole earth.
And I consider very unworthy to support those who support armed bearded men screaming "Allahu Akbar."
It makes me a "right"? OK
You doubt that Saudi Arabia and Turkey support armed Islamist beards? or consider them worthy allies?Your sources of information are questionable and meritless.
I am sure that the Islamists have brought down the plane and shot the pilot not for hockeyRussians can't play hockey for shit!
I doubt Putin gives a shit about Syria.You doubt that Saudi Arabia and Turkey support armed Islamist beards? or consider them worthy allies?
Eh... it's really just two sides of the same coin. Plenty of videos of Alawite militias executing and torturing Sunnis, and also Hafez and Bashar have both ingrained and entrenched the concept of ethno-religion in Syria; there are two sets of laws, a secular version and a religious version. If you're Jewish, Christian, or Druze a separate set of laws apply to you; if you're Muslim you have secular courts and religious courts. Religious education is mandated by the state according to the religion that ones parents practiced. The Assads have tried to present their family as incredibly pious Muslims, they went through a period of Sunnification, and then oppressed Sunnis in Syria. Alawites are given preference in the government even though they account for something like 12% of the population.Assad Alawites are far from the radical fanatics. They are fighting for a secular state, not shouting "Allahu Akbar", not beheading "infidels" that willingly makes his opponents.
Politically Correct Jihad? You can't be serious. I'm not sure whether to laugh or cry. I've never met somebody so far to the left as you. Just when I thought to have heard it all, you surprise me again and again. Bless your liberal heartSome of the things Alawite militias have done have actually helped out Ashar al-Sham and Jubat al-Nusra, as they've taken a new line of jihadism termed "Defensive jihadism," as opposed to "offensive jihadism," which Islamists in Mali, and Daesh practice (in theory).
Political observers are compelled to express biased point of view, and thus create a disgusting to me the fog of propaganda.he cares about the expanded naval base Assad promised him