F*CK THE POLICE!!!

[Harrekin]

ever wonder why the general public are so fucked up. Rah Rah, i know off topic. Or is it ?

Sports Military Worship Propaganda Exposed -- Senate Report Admits Millions Spent On PsyOp
by Bernie Suarez

A Senate oversight report just blew the lid on the U.S. military worship ceremonies we all see at sporting events all over the United States. We see this military worship all the time at college and professional sports events. These staged ceremonies are designed to psyop young men and women into joining the military. They are also designed to sell war and make young adults think that the road to honor goes through a military lifestyle. Sports fans have no idea they are being bombarded with lies and propaganda bankrolled by the Pentagon and the National Guard. The recent Senate report blowing the lid on this psyop campaign labels the paid for propaganda as "inappropriate and frivolous."

The report reviewed contracts between the Pentagon (and National Guard) and sports teams and admittedly labels two thirds of the contracts as "paid-for-patriotism." Yeah, I'll say. Every trick from flag ceremonies, national anthems, ceremonial first pitches, puck drops, color guard presentations even reenlistment ceremonies have been quietly paid for to deceive the sports fans into wanting to join the military.

I would add that even though it's not mentioned in the article referenced let's not forget the pro-military commercials sports fans are forced to watch before viewing team highlights or the cleverly positioned banners on sport websites. The propaganda is everywhere.

To add another twist to this story, the Pentagon is holding back a third of the contracts, interfering with the full investigation. What might the Pentagon be hiding this time? Senator Jeff Flake said of the Pentagon lack of cooperation:
It's like pulling teeth.He also states:
It is troubling to learn that taxpayer funds are being used to compensate these teams for honoring and recognizing U.S. military service members.Even warmonger and criminal John McCain admitted:
thanks to an in-depth investigation, a lot of that patriotism was paid for.When John McCain himself admits that the Pentagon is propagandizing sports fans, that shows you how blatant and undeniable the propaganda is.

The questions we should be asking is why is the Pentagon not cooperating? And, is anyone surprised by this? I'm not. Most people don't realize the Pentagon has an endless supply of money through something called "Overseas Contingency Operation" (OCO) which was set up after 9/11. In this uncapped money siphoning scheme called the "Pentagon Slush Fund" billions of dollars can be siphoned from tax payers to pay for endless wars. For example the phony war against their own proxy army, ISIS, allows the Pentagon to siphon $10 million per day or $8.6 billion annually! Are you beginning to see the bigger picture?

So when sports fans are at stadiums watching all these staged ceremonies, they don't realize it's a paid-for psyop to fool young adults into joining the military to fight in bankers wars, feed the war profit machine and justify billions into their endless budget. There is no honor or integrity in this. Who knows what is in those hidden agreements which the Pentagon refuses to disclose. Are there illegalities reflected in them? Is there something far more nefarious going on that they don't want anyone to see?

Let this be a wake up call to all sports fans. Let sports fans know there is a war on for their minds and the Pentagon is paying millions from an endless fund of money to brand their war machine and steal the minds of young adults.

It's time sports fans and the general public hold team owners responsible for accepting money that funds the U.S. war machine. The individual teams that are taking money from the Pentagon should be exposed and held accountable. Let's stop the nationwide psychotic military worship once and for all. Let's stop portraying military personnel like they are fearless gods that need to be worshiped and let's call this evil for what it is.

Let's hit the military and the Pentagon with the truth they don't want to hear. That everyone in the Military is an order-following slave. The question is how many people in the military will follow orders without considering if the order is lawful and moral? Very few if any because the U.S. military is a machine that weeds out conscientious soldiers. They want and need brainwashed order followers that won't question the morality of the mission.

The U.S. military is arguably the greatest threat to humanity today even though there are many well-meaning men and women in it. I know because I was in the military and I meant well when I served so I know this is a real phenomenon. It's also impossible to know what is in someone's heart. However, the thing that we know for sure is that the U.S. military is a tool for the global elite to execute the plans. There's no getting around it.

This is the reason why Obama has fired so many senior military commanders in the past 7 years. Getting rid of the true honorable men and replacing them with obedient immoral slaves. Let this serve as a warning to all military. The military apparatus serves as a tool of evil for the elite and it seems that will never change. This is why they need to pay for their propaganda intended to deceive sports fans into serving their killing machine.

It's time to say no to the killing machine. Say no to the Pentagon's killing machine dressed as honorable and godly. There is nothing honorable, godly or moral about participating in immoral wars of aggression which are all based on government lies. And if sports teams refuse to acknowledge this then don't support them. Take a stand and see the sports mind control psyop for what it is.
_
Bernie is a revolutionary writer with a background in medicine, psychology, and information technology. He has written numerous articles over the years about freedom, government corruption and conspiracies, and solutions. A former host of the 9/11 Freefall radio show, Bernie is also the creator of the Truth and Art TVproject where he shares articles and videos about issues that raise our consciousness and offer solutions to our current problems.

Wow, that's cool.

10mill × 365 = 8.6 billion.

That's some awesome maths there, truly groundbreaking stuff.

 

[D528]

U.S. Police Leaders, Visiting Scotland, Get Lessons on Avoiding Deadly Force


By AL BAKERDEC. 11, 2015

Photo

Scottish police officers simulated a riot at the Jackton training center in Glasgow, Scotland, where police leaders from throughout the United States gathered to discuss department tactics.CreditKieran Dodds for The New York Times

• • 
    
  • 
    In Scotland, Unlike America, Mass Shooting Led to Stricter Gun LawsDEC. 5, 2015
  “Do you have a large percentage of officers that get hurt with this policing model?” asked Theresa Shortell, an assistant chief of the New York Police Department and the commanding officer of its training academy, where several hundred officers graduate each year.
  
  Photo
  
  
  
  American visitors looking on as Scottish police officers acted out a possible confrontation. CreditKieran Dodds for The New York Times
  “How many officers in Scotland have been killed in the last year or two years?” Chief Shortell added.
  
  Bernard Higgins, an assistant chief constable who is Scotland’s use-of-force expert, stood and answered. Yes, his officers routinely take punches, he said, but the last time one was killed on duty through criminal violence was 1994, in a stabbing.
  
  There is poverty, crime and a “pathological hatred of officers wearing our uniform” in pockets of Scotland, he said, but constables live where they work and embrace their role as “guardians of the community,” not warriors from a policing subculture.
  
  “The basic fundamental principle, even in the areas where there’s high levels of crime, high levels of social deprivation, is it’s community-based policing by unarmed officers,” Constable Higgins said. “We police from an absolute position of embracing democracy.”
  
  From Eric Garner on Staten Island to Freddie Gray in Baltimore andLaquan McDonald in Chicago, fatal police confrontations have fueled public anger across the United States and have prompted police leaders to reconsider established tactics and entrenched thinking on when and how to use force.
  
  Photo
  
  
  
  Scottish officers demonstrated their techniques in handling a man with a knife, the weapon of choice there.CreditKieran Dodds for The New York Times
  

 

[D528]

continued
On Monday, the Justice Department announced that it was opening a civil rights investigation into the practices of the Chicago Police Department after one of its officers was charged last month with first-degree murder in the shooting death of Mr. McDonald, 17.

The killing, in October 2014, was captured on video that the city released under a court order hours after the officer was charged. And just as protests had previously swept New York, Ferguson, Mo., and Baltimore, demonstrators have taken to the streets in Chicago to demand change.

It is the sort of outcry that officials know they will continue to face, and it is why, several weeks before charges were filed in Chicago, leaders from many of the country’s biggest departments had come to the stone castle that serves as Scotland’s Police Headquarters, to hear firsthand about other ways of handling confrontations.

James W. Johnson, police chief in Baltimore County, Md., asked how Scotland’s culture influenced people’s perception of the police. Chief Johnson said he saw few outward signs of the disorder surrounding him at home — roadway trash, graffiti, large numbers of homeless people.

As the American police leaders peppered Constable Higgins with questions, Chief Charles A. McClelland Jr. of the Houston department raised the legacy of racial wrongs that seeps through the criminal justice system in the United States.
Continue reading the main story

100 MILES

North Sea

SCOTLAND

Tulliallan

Glasgow

Edinburgh

NORTHERN

IRELAND

BRITAIN

Irish Sea

ENGLAND

IRELAND






By The New York Times

“And many of these racial and ethnic diverse communities have a longstanding history, negative history, with the police,” Chief McClelland said. “Do you have that here in Scotland?”

While sectarian tensions between Catholics and Protestants still flare up, racial fault lines are few in the country, so the Houston chief’s question was on the minds of many of the American officials.

But at the lecture last month, and at others throughout the week, the answer from the Scottish police remained the same: How officers think matters more than how they wield force, even in a nation where knives, not guns, are criminals’ weapon of choice.

“If you speak about a protest, for instance, the protest of the blacks in the street, well that’s about justice, unfairness,” Kirk Kinnell, the superintendent of Police Scotland and head of its hostage crisis negotiation unit, said after a lecture. “I would say, ‘That message, we should embrace that,’ because actually, as police officers, we want fairness. That’s why we joined.”

None of the officials from the United States raised the specter of terrorism or the nationwide trend by departments to arm counterterrorism units in their agencies to respond more quickly to mass shootings. Rather, they were concerned with situations in which civilians are armed with a knife or a bat, and tempers need to be calmed.

Continue reading the main story
The Videos That Are Putting Race and Policing Into Sharp Relief
A collection of videos that have led to nationwide protests, federal investigations and changes in policy and attitudes on race.

 

[D528]

continued...Man , cut and pasting challeges me. I gotta payee for a reason ,lol.

‘We Must Do Better’

The idea to go to Scotland was born last year when Chuck Wexler, the executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, was here for a leadership program. Speaking to a police recruit, Mr. Wexler noticed he had no gun on his belt.

“It hit me like a ton of bricks,” said Mr. Wexler, who was consumed at the time by the fallout from the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson.

A year later, his law enforcement policy group organized the American leaders’ visit, to inspire thought and to find ways for American police officers to improve the way they handle encounters with people who are armed, though not with guns.

Many departments have been rethinking their rules on use of force, including New York, which in October established explicit guidelines and a new tracking system for documenting force.

Photo

Chuck Wexler, left, the executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, talking with a Scottish officer. “We must do better," Mr. Wexler said of tactics used by American police forces. CreditKieran Dodds for The New York Times
Mr. Wexler sees a historic opportunity for American police officers to shift their thinking on culture, tactics and training. Whatever ideas law enforcement leaders emerge with, he said, one thing is clear, “We must do better.”

In one way or another, those leaders who came to Scotland agreed.

Many expressed dismay over encounters in recent months in which officers were seen using excessive force or aggression.

So, in classroom seminars and training demonstrations, the group of American leaders learned how the Scottish police outfit rank-and-file officers with batons, handcuffs and pepper spray — but no guns — and how the department’s elite armed response teams have shot civilians only twice in the last decade.

Here, officers who retreat are not considered “cowards,” as Pamela Davis, a chief in Anne Arundel, Md., said they would be considered back home.

Photo

A Taser gun used by firearms officers in Scotland.CreditKieran Dodds for The New York Times
Rather, the Scots define backward steps as “tactical withdrawal,” to slow the pace of a street confrontation. In fact, they have taken the American model of hostage negotiation, developed decades ago, and infused it into everyday patrols.

If armed people ratchet up emotions, the Scottish police seek to defuse them. They pay as much attention to moral standards as legal ones. They do not talk about “deadly” force and would shudder to see such words in their policies. Above all, a Scottish constable’s measure of success is whether everyone involved, not just the police officers, survives the confrontation.

“What do you think is a proportionate response?” Constable Higgins asked at one point. “An officer that’s uninjured, but somebody’s dead? Or an officer that is injured but somebody’s alive and in custody?”

A Difference on Guns

On some days, the United States law enforcement leaders were like scientists, meticulously taking notes, requesting data and interviewing constables, trying to wrap their minds around any ideas for gaining public trust. Other days their group talks felt, as one Scottish officer put it, like therapy.

Photo

The police recreating a street fight involving a man with a samurai sword to demonstrate de-escalation techniques. CreditKieran Dodds for The New York Times
When those conversations ended, the Americans’ opinions varied. Many lurched back to a simple fact: Far fewer guns are found on Scotland’s streets than the 300 million in circulation in the United States.

“The guns makes the difference, right?” William B. Evans, the Boston police commissioner, said after one presentation by the Scots. “We have so many guns that deadly force, to us, is always there, right?”

Across the room, Mike Chitwood, the chief in Daytona Beach, Fla., saw something else.

“We in American policing are missing the boat in the respect for human life, altogether,” Chief Chitwood said. The notion drilled into new officers, he said, — “better to be judged by 12 than carried by six” — is misguided.


“I’ve watched great cops get into a shooting that destroyed their lives,” Chief Chitwood said. “They may have been exonerated, but they knew their careers were over, they became alcoholics, they lost their marriages, because they couldn’t handle that they took somebody’s life, even if it was a good shooting.”

Photo

Theresa Shortell, head of the New York Police Department’s training academy, attended the conference. CreditKieran Dodds for The New York Times
Scottish law enforcement officials conceded that some elements of their policing are unique to their country. They emphasized that Mr. Wexler’s venture would help them “learn together,” as Sir Stephen House explained in opening the conference, one of his final official duties as head of the Scottish police, before he stepped down last month.

“We’ll show you what our experience is and how we do things,” Mr. House said. “It’s entirely a matter for yourselves as individuals whether you look at that and go, ‘You know, there’s something there,’ or, ‘Actually, that’s Scotland, that’s a different country.’ ”

But he emphasized that the challenges police officers face when confronting an emotionally disturbed person wielding a knife on a darkened city street are universal, whether they are in Detroit or Dundee.

Time and again, the Americans said parts of Scotland’s experience mirrored their efforts.

Others noted how President Obama’s Task Force on Policing is aiming to redefine officers’ work, so that they listen, speak courteously and explain every action — the tenets of Scottish police work.

Photo

Trainee officers at Tulliallan Police College in Scotland.CreditKieran Dodds for The New York Times
Though some conceded it sounded like déjà vu.

After the race riots of the mid-1960s in Detroit, Los Angeles, Newark and elsewhere, the Kerner Commission blamed the uprisings on racism and called for officers to stop cursing and using racial slurs.

“The problem is, all of the departments didn’t get the memo,” said Samuel Walker, professor emeritus of the University of Nebraska, who did not attend the conference. “And in some departments, it’s very easy for standards to slide.”

New Levels of Patience

The American leaders, among the most progressive in the country, said some of their aggressive tactics seemed necessary in a country with more violence. At one outdoor training exercise, for instance, a Scottish officer playing a suspect with a knife who suggested he had just killed someone — by licking the blood from the blade and proclaiming it “still warm” — ran into a house as officers kept a measured distance.

Looking on, Michael R. Moore, a deputy chief of the Los Angeles Police Department, questioned how a man who demonstrated “a public threat” could be allowed to barricade himself. “What if that building had 15 schoolkids in it?” he said.

At another exercise, a Scottish officer played a despondent man with a shotgun under his chin. But Dave Harvey, an assistant police chief in Phoenix, later said the response by the Scottish team of armed officers was curious.

“They’re not behind cover,” Chief Harvey said.

More eye-opening was a populace that rarely turns guns on police officers, he added.

From a broad view, the leaders who came here from the United States embraced much about the way their Scottish colleagues keep the peace and said they would try to weave parts of it into their own departments.

Commissioner Evans of Boston said his takeaway during a final talk with his international colleagues was, “Take a step back and talk to people, because it works.”

“Your style is exactly the way I want my officers to be,” he added.

But going home to create change in policing culture is not a simple thing, as Chief Shortell, who went from being an undercover officer to the head of the gang unit to leading the New York Police Academy, told the group minutes later.

“If I go back and I do say, ‘Back up,’ ” she said, referring to one of Scotland’s primary tools, “they’re going to say, ‘What happened to Terry Shortell?’ They are.”

Correction: December 11, 2015
An earlier version of this article misstated Tulliallan’s proximity to Glasgow in Scotland; Tulliallan is northeast, not south, of Glasgow.

 

[D528]

On-Duty Cop Arrested For Selling Drugs in Uniform From Marked Police Car
by Asa Jay

An Indiana police officer was arrested on Thursday for selling drugs to an informant and undercover FBI agent while he was on-duty, in uniform, and in his marked police car.

Officer Donald Jordan was taken into custody at the Anderson Police Department at around 3 p.m. for possession with intent to distribute hydrocodone and possession with intent to distribute Xanax, the U.S. Attorney’s office said.

Prosecutors also maintain that Jordan bartered sex for drugs and had been under investigation by the FBI for several months after someone filed a complaint against him in July 2014.

The day before his arrest, Jordan was parked at a gas station in the 900 block of 38th Street in Anderson on December 9 when the informant introduced him to the undercover FBI agent.

Jordan inquired about their plans for the night and was told the women would be partying, prosecutors said. He then asked where they would be drinking and the undercover agent told him they would be partying “harder than that.”

After Jordan pressed for more details, prosecutors say the undercover agent told him they did not trust the police.

The officer reportedly responded by telling her that he is “a better criminal than he is a cop” and that he “is corrupt.” He then arranged to purchase 15 Xanax pills for the women.

After they gave him the money, prosecutors say Jordan left to get the drugs and met the women latter at a business – while still in his marked patrol car – and gave the pills to the undercover FBI agent.

“Allegations of wrongdoing by police officers undermine the public’s trust and confidence in law enforcement,” Anderson Police Chief Larry Crenshaw said.

“Th[is] is not acceptable. As law enforcement officers who are sworn to defend and uphold the law, we must maintain a higher level of public trust.

Jordan was arrested the day following the drug transaction and is now in the custody of the U.S. Marshals on federal possession and intent to distribute charges. He faces up to 15 years in prison.

The incident illustrates the hypocrisy of the drug war and shows that brazen officers aren’t above using their positions to subvert the very laws that they are supposed to enforce.

Maybe as a result of his arrest, Jordan will think about all the individuals he is likely responsible for sending to prison over the same “crimes.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

[D528]

The funny things cops do.....Last story reminded me of this one. lol.

 

[D528]

14-Yr-Old Boy Brandishing Airsoft Gun Shot At 7 Times By Officer, Hit Once
Chris Menahan | InformationLiberation

A 14-year-old black boy was shot at seven times after allegedly pulling an airsoft gun on a Jacksonville police officer this past Friday. Fortunately, the officer was a terrible shot and only hit the boy with a single bullet in his leg.

Jacksonville.com reports:
A Jacksonville teen with a history of mental illness is recovering after he pulled an airsoft handgun from his waistband late Friday and was then shot by an officer responding to a call of an armed prowler at a Northside townhouse, according to the Sheriff’s Office.

Officer Josh Livingood, who has been with the department for two years, was the second officer to respond to the Maple Crest Townhome apartment complex off Harts Road after a woman twice reported someone armed with a pellet gun or BB gun was shooting her windows and doors, said Director Tom Hackney.

Livingood fired six shots at the 14-year-old black male, hitting him once in the leg, Hackney said.

The teen dropped the gun and Livingood was able to kick it away before the teen could recover the weapon, Hackney said.

The teen’s gun, designed to be non-lethal, was a gold imitation of a 50-caliber Desert Eagle pistol with an orange tip, Hackney said. He said the teen was about 25 feet from Livingood and the woman who reported a prowler was near the officer.

Two unoccupied cars behind the teen were hit at least three times but the 14-year-old was the only one injured in the shooting.Family members of the teenager said he has been diagnosed with "minor developmental and psychiatric disorders."

It should be noted the officer was responding to a call of someone shooting a BB gun, not an actual gun, so to open fire on him is rather questionable.

 

[D528]

Wow, that's cool.

10mill × 365 = 8.6 billion.

That's some awesome maths there, truly groundbreaking stuff.

one may ponder, or not......


It’s Time to Stop “Supporting Our Troops”

By Joachim Hagopian
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article43717.htm

 

[spandy]

14-Yr-Old Boy Brandishing Airsoft Gun Shot At 7 Times By Officer, Hit Once
Chris Menahan | InformationLiberation

A 14-year-old black boy was shot at seven times after allegedly pulling an airsoft gun on a Jacksonville police officer this past Friday. Fortunately, the officer was a terrible shot and only hit the boy with a single bullet in his leg.

Jacksonville.com reports:
A Jacksonville teen with a history of mental illness is recovering after he pulled an airsoft handgun from his waistband late Friday and was then shot by an officer responding to a call of an armed prowler at a Northside townhouse, according to the Sheriff’s Office.

Officer Josh Livingood, who has been with the department for two years, was the second officer to respond to the Maple Crest Townhome apartment complex off Harts Road after a woman twice reported someone armed with a pellet gun or BB gun was shooting her windows and doors, said Director Tom Hackney.

Livingood fired six shots at the 14-year-old black male, hitting him once in the leg, Hackney said.

The teen dropped the gun and Livingood was able to kick it away before the teen could recover the weapon, Hackney said.

The teen’s gun, designed to be non-lethal, was a gold imitation of a 50-caliber Desert Eagle pistol with an orange tip, Hackney said. He said the teen was about 25 feet from Livingood and the woman who reported a prowler was near the officer.

Two unoccupied cars behind the teen were hit at least three times but the 14-year-old was the only one injured in the shooting.Family members of the teenager said he has been diagnosed with "minor developmental and psychiatric disorders."

It should be noted the officer was responding to a call of someone shooting a BB gun, not an actual gun, so to open fire on him is rather questionable.

If anyone pulls anything on anyone that looks just like a handgun, I dont give a fuck why they were called out there, thats just dumb and you are risking your life doing such stupid shit.

That kid is lucky that cop didn't kill him. Had he not pulled a stupid stunt, he wouldn't of been shot at once.

 

[D528]

The panty waste cop in the last post should follow this guys lead..

Cop Who Sought Photos of Teen's Erection in Sexting Case Commits Suicide Moments Before Arrest
The cop was the sexual predator, not the teen.
Robby Soave

Police Detective David Edward Abbott, a member of the Northern Virginia-Washington D.C. Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, committed suicide Tuesday before law enforcement could arrest him on suspicion of sexually abusing minors.

Abbott, you will recall, was the detective in the noteworthy teen sexting casefrom July 2014, in which the authorities sought a warrant to take the 17-year-old male suspect to the hospital, inject him with a drug that would give him an erection, photograph his genitals, and compare the photo with existing pictures of his genitals the police had confiscated from his 15-year-old girlfriend's phone.

The teen was eventually sentenced to one year of probation. Here's the kicker: Abbott sued the teen's lawyer for defamation. The lawyer, Jessica Foster, remarked to the media that the warrant to take pornographic pictures of her client--to be used as evidence that he was guilty of creating child pornography--was "crazy."

"Who does this?" Foster had said. "It's just crazy."

Abbott said the comments caused him severe emotional distress; he claimed he was threatened and called a pedophile, according to NBC.

Authorities now believe Abbott was a pedophile. He had inappropriate contact with two young boys, ages 11 and 13, according to patch.com. Police attempted to arrest him at his home earlier today, but he refused to surrender and eventually shot himself.

While this outcome is certainly a tragedy for his family, the revelations about Abbott should underscore two things: His treatment of the 17-year-old in the sexting case was unconscionable, and laws criminalizing sexting between teens are intrusive and easily abused. There actually was a truly depraved sexual monster in this case, it just wasn't the teenager.
_
Robby Soave is a staff editor at Reason.com.

 

[D528]

Adventures of Alfa Puss


2015 North Catasauqua man says lost cat was shot by police NORTH CATASAUQUA, Pa. - Surrounded by his pets is when North Catasauqua's Tom Newhart may be at his happiest. But Newhart is now saddled with grief after Sugar, the six-year-old cat, he and his wife rescued at birth, was killed a week ago Sunday. Just hours after escaping from their home. "It's like one of your children, you raised them, bottle fed them," he said through tears. "I found the cat sitting right here," said Mike Lienert in his yard. Lienert, a neighbor, found Sugar late that Sunday night and said the cat looked injured. He called North Catasauqua Police for help. "First thing at the door he said it's not politically correct but if injured we will put it down," Lienert said. He said a short time later the officer shot the cat near his pool then telling Lienert he'd have to clean up the mess. He said aside from some poking and prodding, the officer never tried to catch the cat. Lienert went on to say aside from scared hissing, the cat wasn't aggressive. After recovering Sugar's body Newhart had her inspected by a vet. "No lacerations, no blood, other than neck wound on body. " Newhart said, while showing his vet's report. In a statement, the borough said it's in the process of gathering information and conducting a review and investigation of what took place. After this process is complete, the borough will be taking the necessary and appropriate steps. For Newhart that means having the officer fired and the chief step down. "Where was the effort made to help? Here they are to serve and protect, not to be judge, jury and executioner on someone's lost cat?" he said. Nearby boroughs 69 News spoke with said animal policy is to only shoot when an animal is attacking someone or a threat to the area, not if it is injured. QUICK CLICKS Whitehall police nab alleged package thief Wolf, allies test House GOP resolve against tax increase Witnesses say smoke from fatal Lower Macungie fire was 'overwhelming' Drug deal leads to shooting, Bethlehem police say PPL Plaza owners file lawsuit against Allentown, Governor Wolf An area shelter owner said the situation could fall under the category of animal cruelty if the officer is found to have done something wrong.
Video here..
Read more from WFMZ.com at: http://www.wfmz.com/news/news-regional-lehighvalley/north-catasauqua-man-says-lost-cat-was-shot-by-police/36981404
Connect with us... Facebook/69WFMZ or @69News

 

[spandy]

Adventures of Alfa Puss


2015 North Catasauqua man says lost cat was shot by police NORTH CATASAUQUA, Pa. - Surrounded by his pets is when North Catasauqua's Tom Newhart may be at his happiest. But Newhart is now saddled with grief after Sugar, the six-year-old cat, he and his wife rescued at birth, was killed a week ago Sunday. Just hours after escaping from their home. "It's like one of your children, you raised them, bottle fed them," he said through tears. "I found the cat sitting right here," said Mike Lienert in his yard. Lienert, a neighbor, found Sugar late that Sunday night and said the cat looked injured. He called North Catasauqua Police for help. "First thing at the door he said it's not politically correct but if injured we will put it down," Lienert said. He said a short time later the officer shot the cat near his pool then telling Lienert he'd have to clean up the mess. He said aside from some poking and prodding, the officer never tried to catch the cat. Lienert went on to say aside from scared hissing, the cat wasn't aggressive. After recovering Sugar's body Newhart had her inspected by a vet. "No lacerations, no blood, other than neck wound on body. " Newhart said, while showing his vet's report. In a statement, the borough said it's in the process of gathering information and conducting a review and investigation of what took place. After this process is complete, the borough will be taking the necessary and appropriate steps. For Newhart that means having the officer fired and the chief step down. "Where was the effort made to help? Here they are to serve and protect, not to be judge, jury and executioner on someone's lost cat?" he said. Nearby boroughs 69 News spoke with said animal policy is to only shoot when an animal is attacking someone or a threat to the area, not if it is injured. QUICK CLICKS Whitehall police nab alleged package thief Wolf, allies test House GOP resolve against tax increase Witnesses say smoke from fatal Lower Macungie fire was 'overwhelming' Drug deal leads to shooting, Bethlehem police say PPL Plaza owners file lawsuit against Allentown, Governor Wolf An area shelter owner said the situation could fall under the category of animal cruelty if the officer is found to have done something wrong.
Video here..
Read more from WFMZ.com at: http://www.wfmz.com/news/news-regional-lehighvalley/north-catasauqua-man-says-lost-cat-was-shot-by-police/36981404
Connect with us... Facebook/69WFMZ or @69News

 

[D528]

 

[D528]

i feel sorry this guys relatives. What a dangerous raging pussy. compinsating it looks like lol. Whatsa matta coppa , big pharma steal your balls ?He sure showed that pole .lmfao. Poor little man , i feel like gifting,

 

[D528]

speaking of gifting ,lol.

Unable to Stop Criminals, Texas Cops Now Pull You Over For "Driving Safely" to "Reward" You
by William Norman Grigg

Lakeview, TX — Police in Lakeview, Texas are routinely conducting traffic stops without probable cause that a violation has occurred -- and have packaged these unlawful detentions in a way that has earned media approval.

The pretext offered by the department is its "Doing it Right Safe Driving Campaign," through which officers who lurk in the shadows like rapists stop drivers who appear to be following all of the rules are stopped and then given Starbucks gift certificates -- but only if a scan of the driver's license and registration reveals no outstanding warrants or violations. The confused and anxious motorists are not told the purpose of the traffic stop until the officer returns with the surprise gift -- which is actually a species of Trojan Horse that permits the officer to sneak a peek at the driver's record without a legally valid reason.

"Recently, we've seen a lot of negative things about the police," explained Lakeview Police Chief David Hotchkiss to the Baxter Bulletin newspaper. "I just wanted to do something that let the community see us doing something good and let us look for drivers doing good things."

The idea earned the approval of Lakeview mayor Dennis Behling and the City Council, and attracted the interest of local citizens who donated the money to buy gift certificates ranging in price from $15 to $25 dollars apiece.

According to Chief Hotchkiss, the "Doing it Right" initiative offers "an opportunity to interact with people for a positive reason. For the community, it allowed them to interact with us when there was nothing wrong and we were giving them a gift. That allowed us to start relationships on a positive note and that's great." The Chief expressed satisfaction over "looking for someone doing something right."

If this were the case, of course, police who stopped drivers for the supposed purpose of commending them for their careful and responsible conduct would not be reviewing their records in search of something "wrong."

There is no such thing as an innocuous contact between a citizen and a police officer, especially when that contact involves a demand for identification and scrutiny of the citizen's background. In every contact with a citizen, a police officer treats the latter as a potential suspect and a threat to "officer safety." Police are taught to treat every encounter as a potentially life-threatening situation, and citizens would be wise to do the same. Citizens should also assume that the police officer is not looking for an excuse to commend you, but rather for a reason to arrest you, especially when they refuse to provide any explanation for the stop.

Texas residents, in particular, have reason to understand that reality. Because of the unwarranted actions of the officer who initiated it, Sandra Bland's encounter with the police escalated from a routine stop to an altercation that led to an arrest, spurious charges of "assaulting an officer," and the motorist's still-unexplained death in a jail cell. The officer in that incident treated Bland's assertion of her rights as a threat to his safety, and a form of "contempt of cop" that supposedly justified summary punishment.

The "Doing it Right" program was brought to the attention of The Free Thought Project by a Lakeview resident -- a recent arrival who asked that her name not be used.

"If the police want to reward somebody for doing things right, give the driver the reward without treating them like a suspect first," she suggested.

Reasonable as that recommendation may be, it would spoil the entire purpose of the exercise. Otherresidents of the town of roughly 6,600 -- with a crime rate much higher than the national average — might find it curious that the police are spending time on a low-risk, high-profile PR campaign that allows them to rummage through the records of harmless drivers, rather than dealing with the city's ever-growing number of robberies and burglaries.

Given the choice of trolling for revenue or protecting property, police in Lakeview -- like their comrades elsewhere -- will always opt for the first alternative.

 

[D528]

Los Angeles Deputy Shoots Partner, Blames Suspect; Both Kill Suspect in Retaliation (Updated)
carlos December 19, 2015PINAC News, The Blue Line, Citizen Journalism, Police Abuse, A Few Bad Apples, Viral Videos,Recording the Police, PINAC News Top 3248 Comments 153,295 Views

A disturbing video emerged Friday showing two Los Angeles sheriff’s deputies killing a man after they had chased him for riding a bicycle while wearing headphones.

The incident took place more than a year ago with the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department initially telling the media that they shot and killed 23-year-old Noel Aguilar, a “known gang member,” after he pulled out a gun and shot a deputy.

But now a video shows the two deputies struggling to arrest Aguilar when one deputy pulls out his gun and shoots the second deputy before placing his gun back into its holster, then placing the blame on Aguilar.

“Where’s the gun?” Los Angeles sheriff’s deputy Jose Ruiz asked Aguilar seconds after his partner announced he had been shot.

“I don’t have any,” Aguilar said.

“I’ve been shot,” yelled Albert Murade for the second time.

“I didn’t shoot nobody,” responded Aguilar.


“I got shot in the stomach,” Murade continued.

“I didn’t shoot nobody,” Aguilar insisted.

Ruiz then pulled his gun back out and pointed it at Aguilar in an obvious attempt to shut him up.

“C’mon man, why you pulling a gun on me,” Aguilar asked.

Ruiz shoots him in the stomach, prompting Murade, who is already angry at having been shot, to fire three bullets into Aguilar’s back.

That sparks angry shouts of protest from witnesses, in English and in Spanish, saying Aguilar did nothing illegal.

“I’ve been shot,” Murade kept repeating now that the struggle was subsiding.

“I’m dying,” Aguilar said, fading away.

“Go sit down,” Ruiz told Murade, pushing his partner away while standing over Aguilar, comfortable he was now handcuffed and facedown, the life slowly slipping out of him, keeping his knee on his back just to be sure.

Murade took his advice and walked off-camera as the shouts of anger became more intense, demanding Ruiz remove the knee from Aguilar’s back.

But Ruiz went from keeping a single knee on Aguilar’s back to plopping his entire body on his back, remaining there for several minutes in a suffocating manner while furious witnesses ordered him off.

It was almost as if he was deliberately trying to squeeze the life out of Aguilar, whom he knew would never shut up about not having shot Murade.

Ruiz is eventually pried off Aguilar’s body by the swarming deputies who enter the scene with their guns pointed at witnesses, ordering them all back inside their homes, running up stairwells to chase people all away.

Or maybe even seize cameras. They had that familiar arrogance we have seen so many times before that they are above the law.

But it does not appear as if they saw the people who were recording, at least one of them appearing to be a woman, because that camera continued to record from an elevated position unmolested for at least eight minutes.

In fact, the footage probably runs longer but this is pretty much all we need to see.

Angel Carrazco, attorney for Aguilar’s family, released the footage to the The OC Weekly, saying he first saw the video three weeks ago, even though the incident took place on May 26, 2014 in Long Beach.

The footage shared by Carrazco’s Tustin-based law firm has been enhanced, slowed down in key spots and transcribed. “We got the video through an independent witness that was there,” he says. “This is evidence that we’ve had in the last twenty days.” Carrazco is handing the new evidence over to the Department of Justice, FBI, U.S. Attorney’s office and the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office in hopes of bringing criminal charges against the deputies involved. The attorney is already in litigation for a civil suit brought on behalf of Aguilar’s family.

How the deputies handled Aguilar after he had been shot is also a matter of concern, Carrazco says. “He’s facing down after being shot four times and they’re on top of him,” Carrazco says. “There needs to be a medical conclusion to find out whether they were trying to get him to asphyxiate or bleed to death. By the video, it seems like they were trying to do both.” Aguilar can be heard screaming, “I’m dying!” while onlookers berate the deputies in English and Spanish that they shot him in the back and to get off him because he’s dying.

The day after the shooting, the Orange County Register accused Aguilar of shooting the deputy because he was a “known gang member” as you can see in the image below.


But then the following month, the Los Angeles Times reported that deputy Murade had been shot by deputy Ruiz, not by Aguilar, whom they referred to as a “transient.”

But the sheriff’s department continued to insist that Aguilar had a gun, even if he didn’t shoot at it as they initially claimed. They also said he tried to grab one of their guns.


And they suggested that he may have even been the one who shot Murade with Ruiz’s gun.

But the video not only shows Ruiz shooting Murade, then blaming Aguila, it shows that Aguilar never reached for any of their guns.

UPDATE: On Wednesday, two days before this video was released, CNN published an article stating that “accidental shootings” increased 500 percent from 2012 to 2014 after the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department issued new Smith & Wesson M&P 9mm.

The article was based on a study funded by Los Angeles County, which states the following reasons those guns are “putting officers and the public at risk.”

–The weapon lacks an external safety;

–It’s more sensitive than the Beretta;

–And a light mounted to the gun and activated by deputies squeezing a pressure switch on the handle has led to confusion in some incidents, with “a significant number of deputies reporting that they unintentionally pulled the trigger of their weapon when they intended only to turn on the light.”

Here is a police report on the incident from earlier this year justifying the shooting.

 

[D528]

hard to believe some u.s. citizens still think thier free and raise thier arm to these thugs that rather see them in the ground. Salute!

The Latest DHS Ruse....Placing People On Watch Lists To Encourage More Police Violence Against Citizens...

The Department of Homeland Security is intentionally placing local law enforcement in harm's way by knowing (and falsely) entering the license plates of patriot-oriented radio hosts in the federal "terror watch" database. The aim of this tactic is to intentionally cause escalations of high-tension interactions between local police and pro-gun patriots, knowing that local law enforcement will respond to terror watch list hits with an escalated engagement posture involving firearms being drawn and pointed at the suspects.

The DHS -- obviously at the command of an anti-American Obama regime that absolutely despises both patriots and police officers -- is hoping that either the patriot suspect opens fire on police or that overreacting police open fire on the patriot. Either way, this serves the agenda of the Obama regime and creates a powerful narrative that mainstream media can use to call for nationwide gun confiscation.

How do we know all this? Because Pete Santilli, the host of Off the Hook on TalkNetwork.com, was pulled over by a police officer in Cincinnatti just two days ago. His license plate was flagged by the federal "terror watch list," causing this police officer to respond with a very aggressive, high alert stance with his primary firearm drawn and pointed at Pete and his passenger (the terrorism "suspects").

This response by the police officer was entirely appropriate based on the intel he received from DHS. After all, thanks to open bo..

the rest:http://www.naturalnews.com/052381_patriot_radio_hosts_domestic_terror_watch_list_DHS.html

 

[D528]

Off topic or is it ? am i to pledge to this ?

Remember Those "Good 'Ol Days" When You Thought That The Government Just Needed Reforming?

“Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.”

– George W. Bush

The younger Bushevik did not recognize the irony of his statement but there it is: “and neither do we.”

People often mistake my scribbling for politics and it is a rejection of the same, categorically. The common argot for the word is the use of compulsion systems to create and grow societies. I chatted up a local Bernie Sanders drone and explained why my opposition to initiated violence locks me out of even considering him (even though as a non-voter, it is a moot point). These woolly-headed collectivists are usually miffed at this notion because they think they have a monopoly on love and peace when in fact they love war with a passion they don’t even realize as long as it’s waged domestically. The Grand Old Politburo loves war on any front. But there is the odd train of consistency that WWi, WWII, Korea and Vietnam were all Democratic enterprises. Go figure.

Politics is nothing more than a polite diversionary word for violence brokerage. A quick thought experiment would solve this fundamentally: if a government could not tax, fine, kidnap, cage, maim and kill with its constabulary forces depending on the level of non-compliance of the Helot, how would it rob any man of liberty much less control vast swaths of geography?

lots more, and it's worth reading: http://zerogov.com/?p=4583

: Snip

: Next year, many Americans will be preparing themselves to go
: vote at the next presidential election, which is scheduled
: for November 8, 2016. If you are planning to go vote during
: that time, you should read this article before doing so.

: The right to vote is not what you think it is. When you vote,
: you are voting for a foreign candidate that represents a
: foreign corporation called the United States of America,
: Incorporated. Do you need proof of this? Read further and I
: will show you all the proof you need.
: Proof that the United States of America (Minor) is a foreign
: corporation

: If you want proof that the United States of America is a
: corporation, look at line 15 and 15(A) in title 28 U.S.
: Code § 3002 and you should see this sentence, ““United
: States” means— (A) a Federal corporation.”

: When I say that the United States or the United States of
: America is a corporation, I am not talking about the
: landmass. What I am talking about is the District of
: Columbia (Washington D.C.), which is a 10 mile radius
: district that houses the corporation called the United
: States of America, Incorporated. This federal corporation
: is also known as the United States of America (Minor). As
: for the landmass, it is known as the Continental United
: States or the United States of America (Major).

: When the United States of America, Inc. was first created, its
: main role was to act as a governmental services corporation
: for The United States of America (Major). The fraud to
: enslave the American people with debt really began when the
: International Banksters of the Federal Reserve bought the
: United States of America, Inc. and took over its agencies
: around 1911.

: The United States of America, Inc. resides in Washington D.C.
: and is a foreign corporation. This is why it has a
: president and a vice president, just like Walmart and
: Target. Under Corporate Law, every corporation is required
: to have a president and a vice president.

: Most Americans do not know these things because they have been
: conditioned at an early age to think that when the U.S.
: government refers to the name “the United States of
: America,” it is referring to the country. In most cases,
: the U.S. government is referring to the corporation (USA,
: Inc.).

: The acronym “D.C.” in the term “Washington D.C.” stands for
: the District of Columbia, which is a district founded by a
: powerful masonic secret society called the Colombians. The
: Colombians also founded Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS),
: Columbia Pictures, and Columbia University. Did you notice
: how similar the words Colombians and Columbia are?

: One thing you should know about Columbia University is that it
: is located in New York. New York was founded by the York
: Rite, which is also another powerful masonic secret
: society. This is why it is called New York, which means the
: new state of the York Rite.
: Did you know the United States of America, Inc. went bankrupt
: in 1933?

: In 1933, the United States of America, Inc. went bankrupt. As
: described at ScannedRetina.com.

: The United States defined as “…the District of Columbia et
: alia” went “Bankrupt” in 1933 and was declared so by
: President Roosevelt in Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111,
: and finally, as consolidated in Executive Order 6260,

: (See: Senate Report 93-549, pages 187 & 594) under the
: “Trading With The Enemy Act” (Sixty-Fifth Congress, Sess.
: I, Chs. 105, 106, October 6, 1917), and as codified at 12
: U.S.C.A. 95a.

: To fix the bankruptcy problem, the International Banksters of
: the Federal Reserve collateralized every common United
: States citizens and used them to finance their corporation
: (United States of America, Inc.). In other words, we (the
: American people) have been securitized and used as
: collateral for the U.S. national debt, which is actually
: the debt of the United States of America, Inc.

: When it comes to politics and finance, most of us lack
: knowledge in these two fields. Because of this, the
: International Banksters can easily trick us to think that
: the U.S. national debt is the debt of the American people.
: In reality, the U.S. national debt is the debt of the
: International Banksters and their corporation (the United
: States of America, Inc.).
: Proof that most United States politicians are treasonists

: The content in block quotation is an excerpt from my second
: seminar on Natural Law. It contains information that gives
: us some clue as to why United States politicians are
: treasonists.

: Nearly all politicians in the USA are TREASONISTS, because
: they swore an oath to a privately owned foreign corporation
: known as the UNITED STATES INCORPORATED. Washington D.C. or
: the District of Columbia is also a privately owned foreign
: corporation. Washington D.C. is NOT part of the USA, just
: like Vatican City is not part of Italy.

: To find the evidence that nearly all politicians in the USA
: are treasonists, you need to be aware of Title 8 U.S. Code
: § 1481.

: Under Title 8 U.S. Code § 1481: “(a) A person who is a
: national of the United States whether by birth or
: naturalization, shall lose his nationality by voluntarily
: performing any of the following acts with the intention of
: relinquishing United States nationality—

: (2) taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal
: declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or a political
: subdivision thereof, after having attained the age of
: eighteen years;

: (4)(A) accepting, serving in, or performing the duties of any
: office, post, or employment under the government of a
: foreign state or a political subdivision thereof, after
: attaining the age of eighteen years if he has or acquires
: the nationality of such foreign state;”

 

[D528]

part 2

: In simple terms, once an oath of office is taken by an
: American citizen, his citizenship is relinquished and thus
: he becomes a foreign agent. This happens because he is
: swearing an oath to the foreign UNITED STATES INCORPORATED
: and the foreign organization that controls it.

: As described in the book The Great American Adventure: The
: Secrets of America.

: All of the candidates chosen for the highest positions in
: government are not chosen by party members or the public
: but are pre-selected by the Royal and Elite and each
: approved candidate must swear an allegiance to and render a
: pledge to adhere to the demands of these Corporate
: Directors and Masters.

: Your so-called right to vote in America is actually about
: slave registration. Every applicant is asked if they are a
: United States Citizen or other. A US Citizen is defined in
: all law dictionaries as a corporate entity. Your vote
: really means nothing during an election because the
: electronic voting machines are rigged.

: Why the “right” to vote in the United States of America is a
: fraud

: In legal term, your right to vote is actually a privilege
: because to be a United States citizen means that you are a
: legal person, also known as a corporation. A corporation is
: a fictitious entity that has no right. So, when politicians
: tell you that you have the right to vote as a United States
: citizen, they are already lying to you.

: Every time you vote, you are giving your consent to be
: governed by treasonous politicians. These politicians do
: not care about you because they work for the Banking
: Elites, which are the International Banksters who own the
: United States of America, Inc.

: The right to vote in the United States of America is a FRAUD,
: because your vote does not really matter and the voting
: system is rigged, just like a casino. Furthermore, when you
: vote, you are voting for a president of a FOREIGN
: corporation known as the United States of America, Inc.

: One thing you need to know about the U.S. voting system is
: that the presidential candidates are chosen by the
: International Banksters and they control both of the
: Republican and Democratic parties. The idea that we have
: choices when it comes to electing presidential candidates
: is an illusion.

: As an American, when you vote you are basically committing
: TREASON against the country called The United States of
: America (Major), which is made up of 50 separate nation
: states operating as a nation on the land jurisdiction. The
: United States of America (Minor) is operating under the
: international jurisdiction of the sea, which is based on
: Admiralty Law (the Law of the Sea).
: The covert meanings of the word vote

: The word vote is defined as “a formal expression of opinion or
: choice, either positive or negative, made by an individual
: or body of individuals” or “the means by which such
: expression is made, as a ballot, ticket, etc.” These two
: definitions of the word vote only show you its meanings at
: the surface. To find the deeper meanings of the word vote,
: you need to use the art of phonics to help you see the
: relation among words.

: Phonetically, the word vote sounds exactly like the word volt.
: Where do you go vote/volt at? In a voting terminal or a
: polling/poll-ing place. The word poll sounds similar to the
: word pole. A pole is the electric battery pole of positive
: (+) or negative (-). In other words, in order to vote you
: need to go to the polls/poles, so that you can place your
: vote/volt on the candidate that you want to see put in
: charge.

: Once the votes/volts are counted, the politician or
: “pole-itician” that receives the most votes/volts is the
: one who is going to be put into the position of power.
: Maybe this is why it is called power politics. Are you
: starting to see the connection here?

: The presidential election is nothing more than a game created
: by the International Banksters to con you to agree to be a
: battery, so that they can drain your energy. This is why
: before they can summon you to go to court, they need to
: charge you first. The content below explains this concept
: in greater details. It is extracted from my article titled
: The Esoteric Definition of Battery.

: The word “battery” is an important word in commerce and law,
: because it has to do with the process of harnessing the
: energy of humanity. In other words, this is one of the many
: methods that they used to drain your energy.

: This energy is then used by the Controllers to “charge” their
: corporations (“corpses” or “dead entities”), banks, and
: other commerce systems, so that they can keep their game of
: conning humanity going. Without our energy to “charge”
: their corporations and commerce systems, their con game
: will not have enough power to stay on.

: As human beings, we are being used as “batteries.” This is why
: before we go to court, we have to be “charged” first. At
: the court hearing, the judge will read the “charges” and
: then “charge” them off after a verdict or judgement is
: made.

: If there is a fine or fee included in the judgement, the
: defendant will be ordered to pay the fine with “currency.”
: The covert meaning of the word “currency” has to do with
: the “flow of energy.” This is why the stored energy in a
: battery is called “electric current” or the “currency of
: electricity.”

: If you live in the USA and want to be free and help spread
: freedom throughout the world, do not participate in the
: U.S. presidential election in November 2016. If you do, you
: are basically committing treason against the United States
: of America (Major), which is the land that you were born
: on.

: If you do not live in the USA, your voting system is most
: likely taken over by the International Banksters too. This
: is because most politicians throughout the world are bought
: off by the International Banksters (the leaders of the New
: World Order), especially the politicians of Western
: countries. This means that when you vote for a candidate in
: your country, you may also be committing treason against
: your original country.

: Sources:
: http://scannedretina.com/2015/03/19/before-things-get-out-of-hand-judge-anna-von-reitz/

: Maxwell, Jordan. Matrix of Power: Secrets of World Control.
: The Book Tree. San Diego, CA, 2000.

: Judge Dale. The Great American Adventure: The Secrets of
: America.


>
I love my country but the gov can fuck off and die ! Standing during the pledge of allegence at my daughter collage i was the only one with hand not on heart and not reciting pledge. I mean , how can i ?

 

[D528]