EXCUSE ME?!..The OFFICIAL Bernie Sanders For President 2016 Thread

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Oh wait that's uncle ben.

You wish you could grow as good as me.

Keep on hating and and posting incredibly wrong info. Your credibility drops lower and lower each post.
you have been incredibly wrong on every post of yours.

you said rend pawl was for legalization. he isn't.

you said i published a book. i didn't.

you called dailycaller a satire news site. it isn't.

and now you say i wish i could grow as "good" as you. i'm glad i don't.

now that you have lied 4 or 5 time sin a row, tell me more about my credibility.

LOL, republicans.
 

hyroot

Well-Known Member
you have been incredibly wrong on every post of yours.

you said rend pawl was for legalization. he isn't.

you said i published a book. i didn't.

you called dailycaller a satire news site. it isn't.

FYI rand Paul Co wrote the bill in 2012 bernie sponsored when reintroduced last month.

and now you say i wish i could grow as "good" as you. i'm glad i don't.

now that you have lied 4 or 5 time sin a row, tell me more about my credibility.

LOL, republicans.

Nice try but if you actually knew what you were talking about you would have some credibility.

Yes daily caller is satire. That's very well known and again


It looks like the facts made you look stupid again
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Nice try but if you actually knew what you were talking about you would have some credibility.
this is going to be funny.

Yes daily caller is satire. That's very well known and again
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Caller

is that why they won an edward r murrow award?

LOL!

It looks like the facts made you look stupid again
see how funny this is?

you are dead wrong, but you think i am. that is so republican of you.

"the main thing i've said is not to legalize" - rend pawl
 

hyroot

Well-Known Member
this is going to be funny.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Caller

is that why they won an edward r murrow award?

LOL!



see how funny this is?

you are dead wrong, but you think i am. that is so republican of you.

"the main thing i've said is not to legalize" - rend pawl
Satire or tabloid what ever. They're not creditable.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/dominican-official-links-daily-caller-to-alleged-lies-about-menendez/2013/03/22/d81470d0-930a-11e2-8ea1-956c94b6b5b9_story.html

You just want to argue for the sake of arguing no matter how wrong or stupid you are. That's the troll in you.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It talks about their credibility moron. That they conjure up stories moron. That's want a tabloid does moron
Read between the lines moron
while i appreciate you stating that a self-proclaimed "republican libertarian" publication has no credibility, that does not make it a fucking tabloid.

also, feel free to admit how wrong you are about it being a satire site.

No possible way your read that whole article that fast moron.
why would i?

i simply did a ctrl+f for "satire" and got 0 results.

it saved me a lot of time rather than combing through your idiocy.

also, you suck at growing.

"the main thing i've said is not to legalize" - rend pawl
 

HGK420

Well-Known Member
Seymour just fixed me a sandwich and fed the cat. I like that. His favorite bed time story to his little puppies is how the moon landing was staged and filmed in Hollywood.
Ya idk about any of that.. But in his defense stanle Kubrick was scripted with the task.. for what reason is a topic of hot debate..

You know who would never get us to the moon... Bernie sanders..
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Just because you put in quotes doesn't make it true. Everyon knows Rand Paul supports mmj. Could you be anymore of a troll?

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/03/10/major-pot-reform-bill-introduced-in-senate


It would be more interesting if any of your posts had any merit.
Dear god in heaven..are you referring to the photo op of racist rendy the insult politician?

:lol:

That was all booker and gillibrand he just jumped on the bandwagon at the last minute (trying to take credit for their work) notice how they're not even standing next to that loser?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Ya idk about any of that.. But in his defense stanle Kubrick was scripted with the task.. for what reason is a topic of hot debate..

You know who would never get us to the moon... Bernie sanders..
Yeah I don't know anything about that..5 deflection penises, stoner:lol:
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Bernie is an answer, if not the answer. If our electoral system railroads him out of the nomination, a lot of people are going to wake up to the fact that America is not and has not been a democracy since WWII ended- and very likely for longer than that.
 

Corso312

Well-Known Member
Seymour Hersch argues that bin Ladin was killed by the paki's. Has written a pretty undeniable narrative that puts Bin Ladin as Pakistans prisoner this whole time and they waited until it was politically beneficial to send a walk in to the CIA annex with the info on where the "messenger" goes.. And then seal team talks a lot shows up and boom....

Pakistan has been one of the MANY hidden hands at play here. Everyone wants to scream about 9/11 conpiracies but no one wants to actually dig into Saudi and paki 9/11 issues.. Thems dudes did it..

IMO Pakistan feels very vulnerable and are playing with the strings behind the scenes to try and keep ahead of India. Because this they knew the value of bin Ladin and having america keep their neighboring countries at war..


And to keep on topic... Bernie can suck it lol..




That's interesting, Nobody could convince me that there werent some Pakistani's aware he was there. The reward was HUGE though.. I think an upper level Paki sold that info to the CIA or State dept. For a huge payday and some citizenship.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Seymour Hersch argues that bin Ladin was killed by the paki's. Has written a pretty undeniable narrative that puts Bin Ladin as Pakistans prisoner this whole time and they waited until it was politically beneficial to send a walk in to the CIA annex with the info on where the "messenger" goes.. And then seal team talks a lot shows up and boom....

Pakistan has been one of the MANY hidden hands at play here. Everyone wants to scream about 9/11 conpiracies but no one wants to actually dig into Saudi and paki 9/11 issues.. Thems dudes did it..

IMO Pakistan feels very vulnerable and are playing with the strings behind the scenes to try and keep ahead of India. Because this they knew the value of bin Ladin and having america keep their neighboring countries at war..


And to keep on topic... Bernie can suck it lol..
Lol.

All those gold AK47S and pr0nz they found him with.

Very prisoner-ly.
 

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
dailycaller is not satire news you moron.

although, here it is from a satire news website.

PAUL: "The main thing I've said is not to legalize"

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/fox-news-sunday-chris-wallace/2013/03/24/sen-rand-paul-top-congressional-issues-pivotal-moment-battle-over-gay-marriage#p//v/2250608088001

LOL!

moron.
Libtards parse, like you just did. Also, this was a 2103 interview, described by the FOX editor as a "rush transcript". His narrative may have changed, and that's OK.

Here's the entire read regarding MJ:

"Why are you more lenient on drug laws, sir?

PAUL: The main thing I've said is not to legalize them but not to incarcerate people for extended periods of time. So, I'm working with Senator Leahy. We have a bill on mandatory minimums.

There are people in jail for 37, 50, 45 years for nonviolent crimes. And that's a huge mistake. Or prisons are full of nonviolent criminals.

I don't want to encourage people to do it. I think even marijuana is a bad thing to do. I think it takes away your incentive to work and show up and do the things that you should be doing. I don't think it's a good idea.

I don't want to promote that but I also don't want to put people in jail who make the mistake. There are a lot of young people who do this and then later on in their 20s, they grow up and get married and they quit doing things like this, I don't want to put them in jail and ruin their lives.

Look, the last two presidents could conceivably have been put in jail for their drug use, and I really think, you know, look what would have happened, it would have ruined their lives. They got lucky, but a lot of poor kids, particularly in the inner city, don't get lucky. They don't have good attorneys, and they go to jail for these things and I think it's a big mistake.

WALLACE: Actually, it would be the last three presidents, but who is counting?"


I agree with every point he made including the negative effects both personally and community wise regarding chronic MJ use.

The social impact on Colorado is not looking too good.
 
Last edited:

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Libtards parse, like you just did. Also, this was a 2103 interview, described by the FOX editor as a "rush transcript". His narrative may have changed, and that's OK.

Here's the entire read regarding MJ:

"Why are you more lenient on drug laws, sir?

PAUL: The main thing I've said is not to legalize them but not to incarcerate people for extended periods of time. So, I'm working with Senator Leahy. We have a bill on mandatory minimums.

There are people in jail for 37, 50, 45 years for nonviolent crimes. And that's a huge mistake. Or prisons are full of nonviolent criminals.

I don't want to encourage people to do it. I think even marijuana is a bad thing to do. I think it takes away your incentive to work and show up and do the things that you should be doing. I don't think it's a good idea.

I don't want to promote that but I also don't want to put people in jail who make the mistake. There are a lot of young people who do this and then later on in their 20s, they grow up and get married and they quit doing things like this, I don't want to put them in jail and ruin their lives.

Look, the last two presidents could conceivably have been put in jail for their drug use, and I really think, you know, look what would have happened, it would have ruined their lives. They got lucky, but a lot of poor kids, particularly in the inner city, don't get lucky. They don't have good attorneys, and they go to jail for these things and I think it's a big mistake.

WALLACE: Actually, it would be the last three presidents, but who is counting?"


I agree with every point he made including the negative effects both personally and community wise regarding chronic MJ use.

The social impact on Colorado is not looking too good.
Tax revenues up, spending on public services up, DUI down...

Terrible social outcomes.

Kind of ironic that someone famed for their growing would say "pot is bad, mmkay".
 
Top