EXCUSE ME?!..The OFFICIAL Bernie Sanders For President 2016 Thread

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Still, the majority of analysts still believe Clinton to be the likely presidential nominee to emerge from the Democratic primaries.

If that was to happen, Chomsky told UpFront that he would absolutely vote for Clinton over any Republican, if he lived in a swing state.

"Oh absolutely... My vote would be against the Republican candidate," said Chomsky, who lives in Massachusetts, a safe state for the Democrats.


Mehdi Hasan interviews Noam Chomsky on UpFront [Al Jazeera]
Chomsky said there were clear differences between the two parties.

"There are enormous differences," he said. "Every Republican candidate is either a climate change denier or a sceptic who says we can't do it.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
If there was ever a more powerful example of why one should vote for the republican candidate, I can't think of one. This alone is possibly enough to swing my vote to Trump.

The fact it was brought to us by al jazeera is the <rimshot> at the end of the joke.

al jazeera is to journalism, what Biz Markie is to..............................journalism.

 

Corso312

Well-Known Member
40 hours a week is plenty, that's why I quit my last job.. Working 6-10's or 7-12's sucks.. You don't even have time to cash your check..banks are closed, that's why most of the guys I worked with are divorced..their wives got tired of raising the kids on her own.. Sure the money is nice but what good is it when she leaves your ass n takes half and you both end up resenting each other? Who makes out? Nobody, other than the lawyers.
 

Corso312

Well-Known Member
Oh I'm not completely crazy man, if you're actually here for growing advise, I'll always lead you in the right direction. Alls I need to sound smart are the right metaphors, which cannabis is so very good at providing.


I think half this site doesn't grow, there is a knee jerk response for most to scream Cal Mag!
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
All of them!
Yeah sure, if you don't understand how economics works

The problem with the economy is that people can't buy things because they don't have enough money, they don't have enough money because wages are too low and inflation is too high. You don't stimulate the economy by cutting programs the poor/middle class rely on, that would make it worse. You stimulate the economy by increasing their buying power.

The only reason house republicans want to cut social programs is because they don't use them
 

red w. blue

Well-Known Member
Yeah sure, if you don't understand how economics works

The problem with the economy is that people can't buy things because they don't have enough money, they don't have enough money because wages are too low and inflation is too high. You don't stimulate the economy by cutting programs the poor/middle class rely on, that would make it worse. You stimulate the economy by increasing their buying power.
Let them get jobs! That would stimulate the economy. You would need to be very dumb to think the crap you wrote was true. You and your parasitic kind could be stimulated with a cattle prod maybe. Buy them a ticket into the work force.


The only reason house republicans want to cut social programs is because they don't use them
Maybe they don't like blood sucking leeches?
Quit trying to stick your hand in my pocket to feed parasites.
 

Corso312

Well-Known Member
Let them get jobs! That would stimulate the economy. You would need to be very dumb to think the crap you wrote was true. You and your parasitic kind could be stimulated with a cattle prod maybe. Buy them a ticket into the work force.

Maybe they don't like blood sucking leeches?
Quit trying to stick your hand in my pocket to feed parasites.




The unemployment rate is like 5% what are you talking about..and half of that 5% is like me..they hustle for a living and receive absolutely nothing from the government.

Leeches? Like corporate and agricultural welfare recipients?
 

god1

Well-Known Member
The unemployment rate is like 5% what are you talking about..and half of that 5% is like me..they hustle for a living and receive absolutely nothing from the government.

Leeches? Like corporate and agricultural welfare recipients?

If the economy is so damn great why are you and your "buddies" complaining?

You can't have it both ways.
 

Corso312

Well-Known Member
If the economy is so damn great why are you and your "buddies" complaining?

You can't have it both ways.


Who are my buddies? I can't have what both ways?

The economy isn't great, its gotten a lot better in the last few years..wages are low and way too many jobs are outsourced.
 

red w. blue

Well-Known Member
The unemployment rate is like 5% what are you talking about..and half of that 5% is like me..they hustle for a living and receive absolutely nothing from the government.

Leeches? Like corporate and agricultural welfare recipients?
Yes just like them.
The work force participation rate hasn't been this low since carter in office the 70s . It has been going down since obloma has been in office. As for the unemployment rate obloma has changed how and what statistics are used and are useless for comparing to anything.
If you hustle then your not supporting the fed., if your not supporting the fed. than you are draining it. Why do you feel you should have a say in what the fed.is or does?
 
Top