Coalition Oversight-Audit Application into Coalition Finances
- Thread starter Sandy420
- Start date
The Hippy
Well-Known Member
I never saw that version before...laughed at the actual slime they had running down the TV ....too funny....Frank RIP....we got you Brother.....willie boy...not so much. He's young
The Hippy
Well-Known Member
Nice tupe on the little fat fuck. He looks like a dick under that. What sort of phoney fucker where one of those obvious things anyway. It's like some type of clown wear.
His first amendment certainly did protect his drool and dribble.
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
here's something from Scott McCluskey-a founding member of the COalition
"Turmel is a real humanitarian soldier. He is so passionate about what he does to help us all. Even in defeat despite amazing and thoroughly thought provoking and winning arguments to the courts, he holds his head high, never ever gives up and creates even better arguments. I would gladly nominate him for the Order of Canada.
Remember this. Turmels recent appeal as lead appellate was to repeal the MMAR, a clearly written statement of what the Coalitions goal was originally and based all their fund raising requests upon the "repeal" aspect. However Turmel clearly elucidated the fact that Allard via CONroy and Wilcox et al, had deviated from repeal to "amendment" of the MMAR. Please post this fact in the rollit up forum. Why, because it is clear evidence of misrepresentation, which the MMAR Coalition raised over $300 k based on a false pretense. No one wanted an amendment, we wanted repeal ! In fact it was part of the original name of which CONroy himself was instrumental in creating, the name as you will remember was MMAR DPL/ PPL Coalition for Repeal. This serious misrepresentation one of many the Coalition aka Cannabis Rights Coalition has done, is grounds for a law suit in civil court. The Coalition lied and changed all of the 3 founding reasons for our lawsuit that was featured front and center on their website next to the request for ongoing financial donations from sick and dying Canadians. This is wrong and demands accountability. CONroys efforts or lack thereof have left fully 1/2 or 18,000 sick and dying Canadians who otherwise qualified until the Manson injunction under Health Canada's rules, without a hope in hell of getting their gardens back. Why? Because he forgot to use the parameter of " personal medical use ". He is no hero or socially conscious Q.C. Lawyer in my books. He is a lawyer, lawyering for money, plain and simple. He is not doing this for free, or even at a respectable discount. He always asks for more money. As former Executive Director and founding member of said Coalition I am angry at how far they have deviated from our original goals, with no one members consent to this deviation, save that of the dictator of this so called non profit society, Mr. Jason Wilcox.
Please I encourage all of you who have been lead astray by these crooks, to ask for financial accountability. An accountability for misrepresentation will be pursued in the courts against Wilcox et al and CONroy, unless they produce as required by law for non profits a certified by General Accounting Principles a true reconciliation of all funds received by CONroys legal trust account and the Coalitions secret " community account ". And an explanation for why they have deviated from the 3 expressed goals, of the original reason we started this action in the first place.
I must give credit to my friends and fellow Coalition members in exile who have been instrumental in digging up the dirty festering under belly of the Coalition, and demanding accountability, they are Nadine Bews, former founder and Secretary, Sandra Comeau Steering Committee member, Michael Pearce, founder, Steering Committee member Ean Price founder and webmaster and Jeff Harris Goldstar member. And of course the venerable Mr. Turmel. If we told you all what we know, you would be as angry as us or more so.
Phone CONroy, email him, call his secretary, use social media, call reporters, do your own research, and make some noise ! I am not going to stand for this another minute and neither should any of you. Demand accountability, and transparency. We are not " haters " as Wilcox calls us, but sick and dying Canadians who demand JUSTICE."
"Turmel is a real humanitarian soldier. He is so passionate about what he does to help us all. Even in defeat despite amazing and thoroughly thought provoking and winning arguments to the courts, he holds his head high, never ever gives up and creates even better arguments. I would gladly nominate him for the Order of Canada.
Remember this. Turmels recent appeal as lead appellate was to repeal the MMAR, a clearly written statement of what the Coalitions goal was originally and based all their fund raising requests upon the "repeal" aspect. However Turmel clearly elucidated the fact that Allard via CONroy and Wilcox et al, had deviated from repeal to "amendment" of the MMAR. Please post this fact in the rollit up forum. Why, because it is clear evidence of misrepresentation, which the MMAR Coalition raised over $300 k based on a false pretense. No one wanted an amendment, we wanted repeal ! In fact it was part of the original name of which CONroy himself was instrumental in creating, the name as you will remember was MMAR DPL/ PPL Coalition for Repeal. This serious misrepresentation one of many the Coalition aka Cannabis Rights Coalition has done, is grounds for a law suit in civil court. The Coalition lied and changed all of the 3 founding reasons for our lawsuit that was featured front and center on their website next to the request for ongoing financial donations from sick and dying Canadians. This is wrong and demands accountability. CONroys efforts or lack thereof have left fully 1/2 or 18,000 sick and dying Canadians who otherwise qualified until the Manson injunction under Health Canada's rules, without a hope in hell of getting their gardens back. Why? Because he forgot to use the parameter of " personal medical use ". He is no hero or socially conscious Q.C. Lawyer in my books. He is a lawyer, lawyering for money, plain and simple. He is not doing this for free, or even at a respectable discount. He always asks for more money. As former Executive Director and founding member of said Coalition I am angry at how far they have deviated from our original goals, with no one members consent to this deviation, save that of the dictator of this so called non profit society, Mr. Jason Wilcox.
Please I encourage all of you who have been lead astray by these crooks, to ask for financial accountability. An accountability for misrepresentation will be pursued in the courts against Wilcox et al and CONroy, unless they produce as required by law for non profits a certified by General Accounting Principles a true reconciliation of all funds received by CONroys legal trust account and the Coalitions secret " community account ". And an explanation for why they have deviated from the 3 expressed goals, of the original reason we started this action in the first place.
I must give credit to my friends and fellow Coalition members in exile who have been instrumental in digging up the dirty festering under belly of the Coalition, and demanding accountability, they are Nadine Bews, former founder and Secretary, Sandra Comeau Steering Committee member, Michael Pearce, founder, Steering Committee member Ean Price founder and webmaster and Jeff Harris Goldstar member. And of course the venerable Mr. Turmel. If we told you all what we know, you would be as angry as us or more so.
Phone CONroy, email him, call his secretary, use social media, call reporters, do your own research, and make some noise ! I am not going to stand for this another minute and neither should any of you. Demand accountability, and transparency. We are not " haters " as Wilcox calls us, but sick and dying Canadians who demand JUSTICE."
Nadine Bews
Well-Known Member
Very well stated Scott. Thank you for elucidating the matter in plain understandable terms and not in bureaucratic legalese.
TheDizzyBizzy
Well-Known Member
IT WAS NEVER ABOUT 'REPEAL' THATS JUST WHAT THEY TOLD THE USEFUL IDIOTS SO THEY WOULD DONATE BECAUSE THEY ARE TOO STEWED PITTS TO UNDERSTAND THE LAW IT WAS ALWAYS ABOUT AMENDING THE NEW LAW THE MMAR IS GONE ITS NEVER COMING BACK WAKE UP TO THIS FACT THE BEST ALLARD WOULD EVER GIVE US IS HOME GROW IN THE MMPR IT WAS NEVER EVER EVER ABOUT REPEAL
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
and if you knew all this, what did you do about it? i don't recall seeing or reading about anything lie what you have said...or are you just here to SAY that people here are stupid and you are the only smart one...??
do you post anything that isn't calling someone names or ripping on them?
what happened to you that you are this way? does it make you feel good to come here and name call etc?? do you feel powerful?
why are you using caps?? are you yelling at me?
did you read that i didn't write what i posted? i agree with Scott.
are you going to do ANYTHING? or will you just give me a nasty reply? i don't think you will do anything other than go on the attack here. why not put some of that anger to good use?
the part i find funny, you're yelling at me about Wilcox and CONroy for pulling the wool over patients eyes...I am one of the people DOING something about it
Last edited:
bigmanc
Well-Known Member
if he only knew...
Nadine Bews
Well-Known Member
January 8, 2013
To Whom it May Concern:
Re: MMAR PPL/DPL Coalition Against Repeal
I am assuming that you have heard about me, John Conroy QC, and have contacted me because you have become aware that on December 15, 2012, the Canadian government proposed legislation to amend Health Canada’s Medial Marihuana Access Regulations (the MMAR) and replace them with new regulations, the Marihuana for Medical Purposes Regulations (the MMPR) and that Jason Wilcox, founder of the Cannabis in Canada Society ([email protected]) has established a coalition of patients, concerned citizens and special interest groups, the MMAR PPL/DPL Coalition Against Repeal (the Coalition) (www.mmarcoalitionagainstrepeal.com).
The purpose of the Coalition is to explore options through legal proceedings, either by way of a ‘representative action’ or alternatively a ‘class action’, to prevent some or all of the new regulations from becoming law. Before the MMPR become law, a representative action will be considered in order to maintain the status quo until reasonable access is assured for those patients having the right to access obtained through the courts and established by the2000 Parker decision by the Ontario Court of Appeal upholding the Section 7 Charter of Rights and Freedoms right to ‘fair and reasonable’ access.
In order to comply with Section 1 of the Canadian Constitution’s Charter of Rights & Freedoms, the MMPR must be a ‘reasonable limit’ on the right of access in all aspects and not restricted to limited or unreasonable access.
The Canadian government plans to enact the legislation on March 31, 2013 and to run the MMPR concurrently with the MMAR until March 31, 2014. Health Canada has given us until February 28, 2013 to express our concerns and recommendations through ’submissions’ to Health Canada and will not be accepting new applications after October 1, 2013.
The MMPR will require persons with MMAR Authorization to Possess (the ATP) to use their licenses to apply to become a registered client of a Licensed Producer (the LP) without the need for a new medical document until March 31, 2015.
While I have considerable experience and have been involved in this type of litigation for some years and have my own opinion, the foregoing timeline dictates that there is some urgency to take action, and therefore we have been attempting to raise funds to obtain an objective and independent ‘legal opinion’ on the constitutionality of the proposed changes and what legal options are available to persons with Personal Production Licences (the PPL) and persons with Designated Production Licences (the DPL).
All funds should be payable to “Conroy and Company – in Trust” and in the subject line please refer to the “MMAR PPL/DPL Coalition”. The initial target is $10,000 CAD in order to obtain a written legal opinion from a large Canadian law firm such as Gowling’s in Ottawa who act as my agent when I have cases before the Supreme Court of Canada. A record will be kept of all funds received and from whom in complete compliance with the rules of the Law Society of British Columbia and generally accepted Canadian accounting principles and procedures.
At the present time we are gathering Impact Statements from the PPL and the DPL in order to see if there is a good ‘representative action’ to be taken to prevent the implementation of some or all of the new proposed regulations, and to maintain the status quo to ensure that constitutional rights are respected. Consequently, we would prefer to seek ‘declaratory relief’ and ‘injunctive relief’ as opposed to compensation by way of money damages. However, if the MMPR should be implemented and individuals suffer damages, then certainly a ‘class action’ will be considered which would be an ‘action for compensation’ by way of money damages if it can be established that the government is liable for such damages.
If you are contacting the firm directly instead of through the Coalition, I will need to know if I can forward your contact particulars to the coalition and that you, otherwise, have no difficulty with your name being known and shared amongst members of the Coalition and, initially and potentially, becoming public if you were to participate in a coalition lawsuit. It is simply not practical and too costly for me to try and communicate with each of your on an individual basis.
If you want to be an individual client and not part of the group, then go to: www.johncoroy.com and you will see the firm’s standard retainer agreement and the retainer required, dependent upon the seniority of the lawyer you wish to retain.
The contact information for Jason Wilcox is set out below, including the specific webpages for the Coalition.
The Cannabis in Canada Society
1062 Granville Street
Vancouver, BC
V6P 4J2
Office: 604-685-6611
Fax: 866-344-6983
Mobile: 604-562-7731
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.cannabisincanada.com
MMAR PPL/DPL Coalition Against Repeal
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.mmarcoalitionagainstrepeal.com
Facebook MMAR Coalition Group
www.facebook.com/groups/406440576091519/<http://www.facebook/groups/4060576091519/>
Linkedin Coalition Group
http://linkedin.com/profile/view?id=105483424&trk=hb side g
Main Linkedin
http://ww.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=10548324&trk-tab pro>
John W. Conroy QC
Conroy and Company
Barristers and Solicitors
259 Pauline Street
Abbotsford BC V2S 3S1
Tel: 604-852-5110
Fax: 604-859-3661
Email: [email protected]
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
what ever happened to "However, if the MMPR should be implemented and individuals suffer damages, then certainly a ‘class action’ will be considered which would be an ‘action for compensation’ by way of money damages if it can be established that the government is liable for such damages"
the MMPR was implemented...yet here we sit. if CONoy started this action, i would try to donate as there would be a return sometime.
it would be nice if CONroy did what Wilcox said and actually did something to expand the injunction...unless that was only Wilcox talking without knowing
the MMPR was implemented...yet here we sit. if CONoy started this action, i would try to donate as there would be a return sometime.
it would be nice if CONroy did what Wilcox said and actually did something to expand the injunction...unless that was only Wilcox talking without knowing
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
did you actually read what was posted? CONroy isn't going after repeal but John Turmel IS.....not sure why you focused on the word repeal only
this isn't about the Allard case as stated in what was written
the reason the John Turmel got involved was because of the screwing that patients got from trusting CONroy...you knw the 18,000+ left outs. Turmel is one of the good guys.
please re read that again so you understand what is being said..maybe then offer an educated response because right now it looks like you are going out into left field.
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
Dizzy has never given an educated response.on any subject, much less answered a question or defended it's position.