We agree on that point. Another four to eight years of the abject stupidity of the progressive agenda and the country should be cratering enough they wake up out of the haze of suicidal, liberal ideology and vote for Conservatives across the board.
wait, you're worried about the national debt, and so you want to vote against the only party that is actually reducing the debt and deficit in favor of the one party that creates all of it?
That's right, because cutting taxes for rich corporations and their owners is exactly what got us into this mess, so why change it?
I doubt that because I'm not rich.Damn London, maybe you ARE the richest dude on this site..
They still haven't called this.. That's how close it is, I'm hearing voter irregularities a possibility.
6 precincts did a coin toss- stupid ass hillbillies..smh
Hillary won all 6 coin tosses..of course.
LOL...you do realize she was a Republican in the 60. A lot of Dems back then were Republican. Guess what, Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican back then as well. The parties have change since then. You should know this.
Right wing eyeglasses: http://www.grand-illusions.com/acatalog/Reversing_Goggles.html
You can't possibly believe that horseshit. $9 trillion in new debt in just the last seven years, leading to a record $19 trillion in debt. Over $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities, almost all of it in progressive social safety net boondoggles and tax cuts for rich corporations were the cause?
Words are nice, but numbers are what really matters
You're going to break their hearts.
Extremely strong numbers for an 'upstart, dark horse, unknown' candidate. Mrs Clinton has up til now benefitted from an almost total media blackout of Mr Sanders' campaign. They have little choice but to cover him and his positions in far more depth now. This race has only just begun...
You forgot 'unelectable'..
Stinking thinking math and zombie lies..just keep telling yourself that shit SCorp.
I'm not sure which reality you're denying. Even if you could tax the rich corporations at 100% and actually believe they would continue doing business, and even if you believe that amount would put a scratch in the debt or unfunded liabilities, how is it going to be applied to those crippling numbers if all that shiny new tax money is going for new "free" shit?
The republicans are right now thinking about what shade of red they should use in their hammer and sickle attack ads
And how much did he cost us during his little 'cat in the hat' tantrum shutdown?
As opposed to paying a negative effective like they do now?
lol @ thinking Cruz caused the shutdown. It took two to tangle and he happened to be on the correct side of that fight. If the dems didn't want the shutdown, they should have given in.
