ec or ppm

hondagrower420

Well-Known Member
TDS defined
TDS stand for total dissolved solids and refers to the measure of all substances contained in a liquid. It is the measurement used to determine nutrient strength. TDS in hydroponics has two different readings; Conductivity and Parts per Million (PPM). Conductivity is the more scientific of the two readings, it can be represented as Electro-Conductivity (EC), Conductivity Factor (CF) or Micro Siemens per square centimeter (MS/cm). PPM is not quite as accurate a representation of TDS but much more common within the United States. If you talk with a gardening friend or read information on a forum chances are the growers there will talk in PPM terms and not Conductivity.

PPM is directly calculated from Conductivity and there are two different scales: NaCl (1EC = 500ppm) and the 442 scale (1EC = 700ppm). Different meters offer different conversion factors and some offer a sliding scale or the option to change the scale to your choosing.

Testing your TDS
There are not many manual testing options for TDS and the ones we have seen use to large of a value range to be useful for hydroponics. Digital Meters are you best option for monitoring your nutrient strength.

All TDS meters are, in reality, conductivity meters, the PPM meter still measure conductivity but use a conversion formula to translate its reading to ppm. TDS meters work by applying a voltage between two or more electrodes. Positively charged ions will move toward the negatively charged electrode, and negatively charged ions will move toward the positively charged electrode. Because these ions are charged and moving, they constitute an electrical current. The meter then monitors how much current is passing between the electrodes as a gauge of how many ions are in solution.

TDS meters will only detect mobile charged ions. They will not detect any neutral (uncharged) compounds. Such compounds include sugar, alcohol, many organics (including many pesticides and their residues), and unionized forms of silica, ammonia, and carbon dioxide. These meters also do not detect macroscopic particulates, as those are too large to move in the electric fields applied. Bacteria and viruses also won’t be detected.
 

hondagrower420

Well-Known Member
I mean I know the math, duh.

But what is the point? Why would anyone need to do this?

There is a reason why ppm uses a conversion factor. And ec doesn't. Ec doesn't get converted.
 

hondagrower420

Well-Known Member
Yes you can
Umm ok.

Get the fuck out of here with your bad info.

I said it once, I guess I have to say it again.

There is no conversion factor used to calculate tds using an ec meter

There is a conversion factor used with calculating tds using ppm meter.
 

adower

Well-Known Member
Umm ok.

Get the fuck out of here with your bad info.

I said it once, I guess I have to say it again.

There is no conversion factor used to calculate tds using an ec meter

There is a conversion factor used with calculating tds using ppm meter.
Math doesn't lie. Keep it moving ricer
 

hondagrower420

Well-Known Member
Math doesn't lie. Keep it moving ricer

Ok. I'm not argueing the math.

EC is a constant. Doesn't change

Ppm is a variable that expresses a conversion from ec

The only reason to use this is if your nutes giving you a target ppm and you have a ec meter. Even then you don't have the conversation factor that your nute company uses so you are guessing.so you would have to guess.


Ppm meters do the conversion for you. No guess work.
 

GrowerGoneWild

Well-Known Member
I just use PPM, it seems more common. however the conversion factor. A GH feeding chart uses PPM for example.

Ec is more universal, no conversion. However its for conductivity,. My buddy uses this over PPM.

As long as my measurements are consistent, and I can reproduce the result. Its not a problem as long as I stay with the same scale. Whats most important is reading your plants and the correlation of that number to plant health.
 

hotrodharley

Well-Known Member
Another example of why @adower is incorrect

1.0ec
- 500ppm
-700ppm

The measurement is still the same 1.0ec

700ppm
-1.0ec
-1.2ec.

The measurement changes.

Ppm represents ec

Ec doesn't represent ppm
The disparity is only between brands. EC is more accurate in determining feed and PPM is simply derived from EC. All units measure the EC and then convert for your convenience or whatever. Many who are incapable of working with this without some deeper understanding should perhaps stick to mixing nutes at reduced levels always. If not they are on here "Help my babies are all fucked up!"
 
Top