Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Regarding your question of how many times a gun is used to defend but not discharged, I think this is a good question, but I don't know where anybody keeps statistics on it. I do know of several stories told by friends where they came home unannounced and were confronted by their wife with a gun pointed at them. I also remember my mom telling me of a time where my dad got drunk and pointed a gun at her after an argument. In all those cases, I'm glad to say the gun was not fired. All I have and all anybody has is stories.How do they account for the number of incidences where a firearm is used to legitimately protect or defend, but not actually fired. If that number isn't 500-1000+ times more frequent than when the firearm is actually discharged, I would be surprised.
I have an honest question. What were the total deaths by firearms last year, not including police incidents and suicides?
I think I've made a case for saying that for every time a gun is validly used to defend there are about 5 times where the gun injures or kills somebody in an accident.
The NIH database doesn't break down data into police vs nonpolice use. In 2014, there were 464 legal fire arm deaths. How many were police and how many were not, is not available from the NIH database.
Your question was a straw man so I ignored it. I did not say there were quotes from Fox on this thread. The answer to your question is there are no quotes from Fox in this thread and I think you knew that. Insisting on my answering was this pretty moronic of you but you are what you are.Why don't we call the topic [how fogdog can ignore 2 questions by posting long post].
Last edited: