Where are you getting the 4K number from?
How did America handle the hottest years on record in the 1930s? What "new" crops did they plant in its wake?
To what extent are oceans not rising?
SURPRISE!
Phytoplankton, it turns out, are highly adaptive, despite your doomsday desires, kid.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/phytoplankton-climate-kachur-1.3349107
To summarize in advance, anthropogenic emissions of CO2 have NO MEASURABLE EFFECT ON THE NET EMISSIONS because Nature trumps whatever we try to do.
CO2 levels are determined by temperature, not the other way around, kid.
It's the LAW (of Henry).
Even NASA agrees.
so much bullshit in there.
i guess what i should be left with is the assurance of a nutbag who thinks CO2 is not even a greenhouse gas (LOL) telling me that rapid, dramatic, manmade changes to the planet earth will have no effect on planet earth, or the humans living on it.
i guess i can sleep well knowing that.
nonetheless, i should address some of the horribly misleading bullshit you put out there.
first of all, let's look at you chart showing how little the oceans have risen in the last 24,000 years.
the ~100+ meter rise in sea level corresponds with a whopping ~3 degrees celsius change in temperatures!
i can only wonder why you might have chosen to leave that little detail out!
i wonder what would be the result of another 4 degrees celsius change in global temperatures (all caused by human activities) over a mere century or two?
probably nothing to worry about, because heckler said so. you can trust what heckler says because heckler does not even believe in the elementary tenets of climate science regarding C02.
as far as CO2 emissions having no effect because mother nature just eats it all up, that is false. categorically false. measurably false. demonstrably false.
mother nature does not have enough CO2 sinks to handle all of our emissions.
hence why CO2 levels have risen dramatically in the last century, from ~280PPM to 400+ PPM