Only a fool would say he's cool with losing American service men/women. Maybe you will have a chance to be cool losing your son, seeing how you are a big fan of the killing of our service personal as long as we kill more. Stop talking stupid
Hey chucklehead, the "few thousand" I was OBVIOUSLY referring to were the victims of 9-11. Pull your head out of your ass and try to keep up.
which makes it even worst. We went to war in Afghanistan, then Iraq. The people who crashed the plan were from Saudi Arabia , Egypt, Lebanon, and United Arab Emirates. I think we missed our targets
Again, you seem to miss the point. You kill a few thousand of ours, we kill a few million of yours. Notice I didn't mention any restrictions on culpability or nationality? I think the indiscriminate nature makes our response all the more frightening.
If you think we have killed a few million, you are dumber than a box of rocks. That's more than Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. To this day I'm not sure who ALL planned , plotted, financed that 9-11 attack. We only know what the Bush admin told us.
Then how on earth do you determine "theirs"?
Did you miss where I said the "kill a few thousand of ours, we kill a few million of yours" plan was possibly what they ran with? I can't speak to the inner thoughts of the generals who devised it. Maybe the plan was to start killing everyone and get to the culprits by the process of elimination.
Uh, there are quite a few organizations that I wouldn't be surprised to find out you hold membership cards to, that estimate the death toll in Iraq and Afghanistan to be over 1 million and we aren't exactly done yet, are we?
America...
really?
He should nominate Hillary Clinton and then Bernie could be president.... Just before I shoot myself...
Really! looks like you're about as intelligent as you think everyone else is.
, the Supreme Court ruled that a university's use of racial "quotas" in its admissions process was unconstitutional, but a school's use of "affirmative action" to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances. The case involved the admissions practices of the Medical School of the University of California at Davis. The medical school reserved 16 out of 100 seats in its entering class for minorities, including "Blacks," "Chicanos," "Asians," and "American Indians."You cant say verbatim of a view, a view is a way of looking at something, seeing something, your idea of something. Not something so easy put into words. Verbatim would be the exact words, spoken or written. You said "almost verbatim" that's the same as "almost pregnant" and they are OXMORONS.
NOT GOP Called it a theory or at the very best hearsay so he said it was better than a theory, YOU called it a theory so Scalia has a higher opinion of evolution than you or that's what you said.
wow another "case before the supreme court and Scalia goes hunting with a plaintiff/defendant" coincidence
Scalia shit himself massively. It was one of the last things his body did...well that plus pissing and farting. The stench in the room was horrendous. He was alone with no family to say goodbye. The world is now a better place
citation.
I remember when they did bussing.Really! looks like you're about as intelligent as you think everyone else is.
I don't usually communicate with people who have a total lack of decorum, such as yourself, but I'm only going to reply to show how much of a liar you are, or ignorant, you can pick which it is. You really seem to be the one no one likes, and I can see why.
The Bakke case in 1978 outlawed quotas. So there were indeed quotas in my lifetime.
"In Regents of University of California v. Bakke (197
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/rights/landmark_regents.html
I'm curious to see what your next move will be. To discredit PBS (yes the Public Broadcast System) as a bastion of white supremacy and right wing propaganda?
Or to try to redefine the use of the term quota. I'm curious what your meaning for the term quota is if reserving a specific number of seats for a particular class doesn't meet the meaning of that term in your eyes?
If you're going to say that I implied that quotas were in use for decades that simply isn't the case. I just know that indeed they were at one point used. It took the high court until very recently to strike down point based systems where minorities were given a lot of points for not being white. I'm actually fine with extra points, but they're illegal now too.
*drops mic*