36V cobs run at 700 mA pull just under 23W each (32.72V*0.700A = 22.9W)I think I'm asking a different question. I'm using this driver to run 4 CXB3590 72V chips at 54W. I get 54W each because the B model gives 8% more current when the dimming leads are capped off. Add 8W for the 96% driver efficiency factor and the resulting 224W is exactly what my Kill-a-watt says.
Those 8 COBs would get slightly more than 27W each, according to the curve of the graph?
Right, figured that. I'm just trying to learn, not necessarily trying to swap out my brand new chips already lolBUT you bought 72V chips for some reason so for now, no you cant without buying new chips
current droop is relative output dropping with higher currentSo how does current droop compare with temperature droop?
good looks on the infoLike I said bro. Any help you need to build your first lamp I'll gladly give any tips I can. Just build one and replace one light. See for yourself. I wouldn't change all my lights out without testing it out first myself. Also I'll just drop this little bomb here that a bin jump is coming in cree in the next month or so. So go ahead and expect 9-10% more output from all the cxb line.
Yeah I understand that but it's not 10% more efficient it's 10% more lumens per watt. So at 1.4@ the 3500k cxb3590 is not going from an overall efficiency of 56.34% to 66.34% Is all I was getting at lol.thats the very definition of efficiency. lumens/watt of dissipation
brighter for the same input= more efficient.
again look at supras tables or a 5000K DB vs a 3000K BD
efficiency higher across the board
or alternatively:
https://www.rollitup.org/t/top-bin-cob-comparison.891010/
Okay, I think I know what I'm trying to ask; can I run 8 CXB3590 36V chips on this driver and replicate his setup?
View attachment 3613917
AGAIN, If and WHEN a unit is AS GOOD or BETTER than a Gavita comes out. EVERYONE will know about it, SO until then, STFUYou have a long history of talking shit without knowing anything about the subject. Maybe this time you might try boning up first?
The ONLY stat where COB LED falls short is initial cost; yep, they're expensive. So's a new 'Vette, but no one's complaining because they know what it does.
So go learn what COB LED does, and you'll understand why those of us who know the time value of money are getting in big, before the crowd.
AGAIN, If and WHEN a unit is AS GOOD or BETTER than a Gavita comes out. EVERYONE will know about it, SO until then, STFU
I love when HEAVILY invested LED users get all butthurt,LOL
I NEVER had to build a light.( grower,not a light builder) I bought the best available at the time. LED has been around for YEARS. in fact, when the blurples didn't do everything they claimed, they switched up to bright whites. what are they going to switch to next to TRY and be as good as HPS?............wow whos getting all excited over here lmao. Don't worry there are gavita replacement fixtures on the market right now. Like I posted earlier it took 8 years for DE to be accepted. Just because there was no internet chatter didn't mean there wasn't arguments over its superiority. Market adoption doesn't happen over night. To refute hard numbers is basically sticking ones head in the sand pretending that it's all a good/bad dream. Just like I told mongo. Build one light just one. Build it properly and give it its fair due and you will see with your own eyes. If you do that and then you produce significantly less per watt come here and rub it in our face lol. Making blanket statements without real world experience with what your talking about is honestly not conducive to anyone.
Well that's not strictly true. @ttystikk could always add a second set of the 72v chips. Four cobs wired in series, two sets of cobs wired in parallel for ~350ma per string. @MrFlux did something similar with vero 10's some time ago.BUT you bought 72V chips for some reason so for now, no you cant without buying new chips
gavitas took 8 yrs to be accepted?LOL more like 8 years to TAKE OVER the market............wow whos getting all excited over here lmao. Don't worry there are gavita replacement fixtures on the market right now. Like I posted earlier it took 8 years for DE to be accepted. Just because there was no internet chatter didn't mean there wasn't arguments over its superiority. Market adoption doesn't happen over night. To refute hard numbers is basically sticking ones head in the sand pretending that it's all a good/bad dream. Just like I told mongo. Build one light just one. Build it properly and give it its fair due and you will see with your own eyes. If you do that and then you produce significantly less per watt come here and rub it in our face lol. Making blanket statements without real world experience with what your talking about is honestly not conducive to anyone.
What is there to copy?Oh, and there is a reason gavitas are being copied by other companies, YET, those companies AREN"T copying johnson grow lights or ANY LED for that matter.
If a LED unit hits the market that grows as much weed as my DE and uses less power to do it.I'll be first in line to buy it.Well sit back and relax and enjoy the show. Your mind is made up. I only suggested to build one to save you a few bucks incase it's a waste of money in your opinion. Science is on my side. Just like cannabis not being some super addictive deadly drug there are those that fight blindly to the end without ever actually doing due diligent research. Johnson Grow Lights is what 6 months old that argument is childish honestly. Not here to argue the proof will soon be evident. Also I never heard people yelling from the roof tops 6 months after Gavita introduced there fixtures either.