Gquebed
Well-Known Member
Your guy is hurting your yield. DLI, or Daily Light Interval, can be thought of as the total tally of photons your plants get in a given 24 hour period, which takes into account both duration and intensity.
Simply put, the more light, the better, up to the point of saturation- which isn't happening in too many indoor grows because it's extremely expensive. Therefore, a grower wants to get every minute of lights on time s/he can.
Running a schedule of less than 12 hours of light through early and mid bloom is unnecessary and counterproductive in terms of encouraging plant growth. Only in the last weeks does it make much sense to shorten overall day length.
Many people run 13 hours on, knowing their plants will flower with 11 hours of darkness. Still others are experimenting with far red LED lighting at lights out to encourage the night response, all to add another hour of daylight.
And this goes for abnormally long periods of darkness at the beginning or the end of bloom, as well.
So how is it that some are claiming bigger yields on lighting schedules with far less light?
I believe RM3 has a grow or two on here doing 9 on and 15 off...i think it was... and said he has plans to cut to as low as 6 hours of lights on...
After i read an article in HT i think it was about some gas latern routine i tried 10/14 for flower and found no loss of yield at all on a strain i do regularly. In fact, there was a slight gain in yield.... although it was a small enough gain that i cant fairly claim it was due to the lighting change.
But what was very clear to me was that 2 less hours of light did not have any adverse effect at all...